Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Notice on Oral Argument Time — Blue Flame Medical LLC v. Chain Bridge Bank, N.A., No. 21-2218 (4th Cir.)

Notice on Oral Argument Time — Blue Flame Medical LLC v. Chain Bridge Bank, N.A., No. 21-2218 (4th Cir.)

Summary

A notice from the Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, dated October 19, 2022, in No. 21-2218 (L), Blue Flame Medical LLC v. Chain Bridge Bank, N.A., 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD, filed as Doc: 61. It is addressed to Mr. Schoenfeld, Mr. Citron and Mr. Orseck and states that the court will allow a total of 40 minutes of oral argument time. As attorneys for appellants, Mr. Schoenfeld and Mr. Citron are generally expected to split 20 minutes. The notice says leave has not been granted for additional oral argument time, and that a motion for more time or amended oral argument acknowledgment forms should be filed by October 24, 2022.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Date
2022-10-19

Cite this document

“Notice on Oral Argument Time — Blue Flame Medical LLC v. Chain Bridge Bank, N.A., No. 21-2218 (4th Cir.).” Original at ecf.ca4.uscourts.gov, dated 2022-10-19. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2022-10-19-no-21-2218-l-blue-flame-medical-llc-v-chain-bridge-bank-n-a/, SHA-256 094458de35b654ef1dc8d25a6c9c17b72f0af23f831f31bef01bdc91d8627c78.

Full text

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
1100 East Main Street, Suite 501, Richmond, Virginia 23219
October 19, 2022
____________________________

NOTICE
____________________________

No.
21-2218 (L),
Blue Flame Medical LLC v. Chain Bridge Bank, N.A.

1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD

RESPONSE DUE: October 24, 2022

TO:  Mr. Schoenfeld, Mr. Citron, and Mr. Orseck

Please be advised that the court will allow a total of 40 minutes of oral argument
time for this case.  As attorneys for appellants, Mr. Schoenfeld and Mr. Citron are
generally expected to split 20 minutes of argument time.   Although leave for
separate briefing was allowed due to the non-alignment of appellants’ issues, leave
has not been granted for additional oral argument time.

If the parties are unable to agree on an allocation of the standard 40 minutes of
argument time, a motion for additional oral argument time should be filed by
October 24, 2022.  If no additional argument time is needed, please file amended
oral argument acknowledgment forms by October 24, 2022.

Patricia S. Connor, Clerk

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2218      Doc: 61            Filed: 10/19/2022      Pg: 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.ca4.165138.61.0.pdf
Size
90,643 bytes
SHA-256
094458de35b654ef1dc8d25a6c9c17b72f0af23f831f31bef01bdc91d8627c78
Our copy
gov.uscourts.ca4.165138.61.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top