United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Appeal Number 22-11873-F (Angel Guzman, et al v. Robinhood Markets, Inc., et al) — In re January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation (Dkt. 492, S.D. Fla.)

Summary

A letter from the Clerk of Court of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, David J. Smith, dated June 23, 2022 and entered on the FLSD docket June 24, 2022 as Document 492 in In re: January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation, Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Addressed to counsel at Hach Rose Schirripa & Cheverie, LLP and Joseph Saveri Law Firm, LLP, the letter assigns Appeal Number 22-11873-F to Angel Guzman, et al v. Robinhood Markets, Inc., et al and sets out the electronic filing rules and the Certificate of Interested Persons due under FRAP 26.1, with Appellants' CIP due within 14 days. The four-page docket entry closes with the text of the notice of appeal from the final Order entered on May 13, 2022 [ECF No. 470].

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Date: 2022-06-23

Cite this document

“United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Appeal Number 22-11873-F… (Dkt. 492).” Original at archive.org, dated 2022-06-23. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2022-06-23-angel-guzman-et-al-v-robinhood-markets-inc-et-al/, SHA-256 36e4eceb1145725f231a82e2d71bba734053a530557285ad0b79de285e8d9874.

Full text

Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 492 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2022 Page 1 of 4
USCA11 Case: 22-11873 Date Filed: 06/03/2022 Page: 1 of 3

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS KP
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Jun 23, 2022
ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING
56 Forsyth Street, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Miami

David J. Smith For rules and forms visit
Clerk of Court www.ca11.uscourts.gov
June 23, 2022

Kathryn Hettler
Hach Rose Schirripa & Cheverie, LLP
112 MADISON AVE FL 10
NEW YORK, NY 10016

Seth Pavsner
Hach Rose Schirripa & Cheverie, LLP
112 MADISON AVE FL 10
NEW YORK, NY 10016

Joseph Saveri
Joseph Saveri Law Firm, LLP
601 CALIFORNIA ST STE 1000
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108

Frank R. Schirripa
Hach Rose Schirripa & Cheverie, LLP
112 MADISON AVE FL 10
NEW YORK, NY 10016

Steven Noel Williams
Joseph Saveri Law Firm, LLP
601 CALIFORNIA ST STE 1000
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108

Christopher Kar-Lun Young
Joseph Saveri Law Firm, LLP
601 CALIFORNIA ST STE 1000
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108

Appeal Number: 22-11873-F
Case Style: Angel Guzman, et al v. Robinhood Markets, Inc., et al
District Court Docket No: 1:21-md-02989-CMA

Please use the appeal number for all filings in this court.
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 492 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2022 Page 2 of 4
USCA11 Case: 22-11873 Date Filed: 06/03/2022 Page: 2 of 3

Electronic Filing
All counsel must file documents electronically using the Electronic Case Files ("ECF") system,
unless exempted for good cause. Although not required, non-incarcerated pro se parties are
permitted to use the ECF system by registering for an account at www.pacer.gov. Information
and training materials related to electronic filing are available on the Court's website.

Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement ("CIP")
Every motion, petition, brief, answer, response, and reply must contain a CIP. See FRAP 26.1;
11th Cir. R. 26.1-1. In addition:

• Appellants/Petitioners must file a CIP within 14 days after this letter's date.
• Appellees/Respondents/Intervenors/Other Parties must file a CIP within 28 days after
this letter's date, regardless of whether Appellants/Petitioners have filed a CIP.
• Only parties represented by counsel must complete the web-based CIP. Counsel must
complete the web-based CIP, through the Web-Based CIP link on the Court's website,
on the same day the CIP is first filed.

The failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the
case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), no action taken on deficient documents, or other
sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5(c).

Civil Appeal Statement
Appellants and Cross-Appellants must file a Civil Appeal Statement, which is available on the
Court's website, within 14 days after this letter's date. See 11th Cir. R. 33-1(a).

Attorney Admissions
Attorneys who wish to participate in this appeal must be properly admitted either to the bar of
this court or for this particular proceeding, See 11th Cir. R. 46-1; 46-3; 46-4. In addition, all
attorneys (except court-appointed attorneys) who wish to participate in this appeal must file an
appearance form within fourteen (14) days after this letter's date. The Application for
Admission to the Bar and Appearance of Counsel Form are available on the Court's website.
The clerk generally may not process filings from an attorney until that attorney files an
appearance form. See 11th Cir. R. 46-6(b).

Defaults
Pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed after 14 days and without
further notice unless the following default(s) have been corrected:

Transcript Information Form
Pursuant to FRAP 10(b), the appellant must, within 14 days, file a Transcript Information Form,
which is available on the Court's website. See FRAP 10(b)(1); 11th Cir. R. 10-1. Unless a
transcript is ordered, the appellant's brief is due 40 days after June 3, 2022. See 11th Cir. R. 12-
1 and 31-1.

Obligation to Notify Court of Change of Addresses
Each pro se party and attorney has a continuing obligation to notify this court of any changes to
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 492 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2022 Page 3 of 4
USCA11 Case: 22-11873 Date Filed: 06/03/2022 Page: 3 of 3

the party's or attorney's addresses during the pendency of the case in which the party or attorney
is participating. See 11th Cir. R. 25-7.

Sincerely,

DAVID J. SMITH, Clerk of Court

Reply to: Dionne S. Young, F
Phone #: (404) 335-6224
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 474
492 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022
06/24/2022 Page 1
4 of 2
4
USCA11 Case: 22-11873 Date Filed: 06/03/2022 Page: 1 of 56

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres

IN RE:

JANUARY 2021 SHORT SQUEEZE
TRADING LITIGATION
____________________________________/

This Document Relates to:

ALL ANTITRUST ACTIONS

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Notice is hereby given that Plaintiﬀs Angel Guzman, Burke Minahan, Christopher Miller,

and Terell Sterling (collectively, “Plaintiﬀs”), on behalf of themselves and others similarly

situated, appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit from the ﬁnal

Order entered on May 13, 2022 [ECF No. 470], which grants Defendants Robinhood Markets,

Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC and Citadel Securities LLC’s

Motion to Dismiss the Amended Antitrust Tranche Complaint [ECF No. 456], and dismisses

Plaintiﬀs’ Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint [ECF No. 451] with prejudice. A copy

of the order is attached as Exhibit A hereto.

File and source

File: gov.uscourts.flsd.590042.492.0.pdf
Size: 235,272 bytes
SHA-256: 36e4eceb1145725f231a82e2d71bba734053a530557285ad0b79de285e8d9874
Our copy: gov.uscourts.flsd.590042.492.0.pdf
Original: archive.org