Plaintiffs' Restated Opposition to Defendant Apex Clearing Corporation's Motion for Expansion of Page Limitations for Briefing on Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Class Action Complaint — In re January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation (Dkt. 488, S.D. Fla.)
Summary
Plaintiffs' Restated Opposition to Defendant Apex Clearing Corporation's Motion for Expansion of Page Limitations for Briefing on Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Class Action Complaint (Document 488) in In re: January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation, Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, entered on the FLSD docket June 16, 2022 and relating to the Other Broker Tranche. Plaintiffs Peter Jang and Erik Chavez oppose Apex's motion [ECF Doc. 487] for the reasons set forth in their prior Opposition filed June 14, 2022 [ECF Doc. 482], repeating that the Court's Order of June 3, 2021 already set special page limits of 40, 40 and 20 pages, and ask that the motion be denied. The three-page filing is dated June 16, 2022, signed by Peter Safirstein with Gary S. Graifman and Rachel W. Furst, and closes with a certificate of service dated June 16, 2022.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
- Date
- 2022-06-14
Cite this document
“Plaintiffs' Restated Opposition to Defendant Apex Clearing Corporation's Motion for Expansion of Page Limitations for… (Dkt. 488).”
Original at archive.org, dated 2022-06-14. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2022-06-14-covid-era-misc/
, SHA-256 bf5bbfdabb0f73fcf5dc8406cebecda5c43eb98e21d62ad3cacb952a74233eef.Full text
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 488 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/16/2022 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/TORRES
In re:
JANUARY 2021 SHORT SQUEEZE
TRADING LITIGATION
_________________________________/
This Document Relates to the Other Broker Tranche
PLAINTIFFS’ RESTATED OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT APEX CLEARING
CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR EXPANSION OF PAGE LIMITATIONS FOR
BRIEFING ON MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs Peter Jang and Erik Chavez oppose the motion [ECF Doc. 487] of defendant
Apex Clearing Corporation (“Apex”) for expanded briefing on the anticipated Motion to Dismiss
for the reasons set forth in Plaintiffs’ prior Opposition filed June 14, 2022 [ECF Doc. 482]. For
the reasons stated therein, there exists no good cause as to why Apex is unable to efficiently
argue its positions in accordance with the Court’s Order of June 3, 2021 wherein the Court
already ordered “special page limits” of 40 pages for the motion to dismiss, 40 pages for the
opposition and 20 pages for reply [ECF 323].
Accordingly, Apex’s motion should be denied.
Dated: June 16, 2022 Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Peter Safirstein
Peter Safirstein*
SAFIRSTEIN LAW LLC
45 N. Broad Street
Suite 100
Ridgewood, NJ 07450
Tel: (917) 952-9458
psafirstein@safirsteinlaw.com
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 488 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/16/2022 Page 2 of 3
Gary S. Graifman*
KANTROWITZ, GOLDHAMER &
GRAIFMAN, P.C.
16 Squadron Boulevard
New City, New York 10956
Phone: (845) 356-2570
Fax: (845) 356-4335
ggraifman@kgglaw.com
Plaintiffs’ Counsel in the
Other Broker Tranche
Rachel W. Furst
GROSSMAN ROTH TAFFA
COHEN, P.A.
2525 Ponce de Leon Blvd., Ste 1150
Coral Gables, FL 33134-6040
Tel: 305-442-8666
rwf@gossmanroth.com
Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel
*Counsels’ Certificates of Understanding
have previously been filed
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 488 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/16/2022 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on June 16, 2022, I electronically filed the forgoing with the Clerk of
the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing is being served this day on all counsel
of record in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing
generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel who are not
authorized to receive Notices of Electronic Filing.
By: /s/ Gary S. Graifman
Gary S. Graifman
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.flsd.590042.488.0.pdf
- Size
- 588,387 bytes
- SHA-256
- bf5bbfdabb0f73fcf5dc8406cebecda5c43eb98e21d62ad3cacb952a74233eef
- Original
- archive.org