Notice of Certain Plaintiffs' Non-Compliance and Request for Dismissal — Adams v. Mass General Brigham

Summary

Defendant Mass General Brigham Incorporated files a notice in Tyler Adams, et al., v. Mass General Brigham Incorporated, Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-11686, in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, dated June 7, 2022. The notice states that, with the exception of Plaintiff Laina Frazier, none of the plaintiffs listed in the Court's Notice and Order of May 16, 2022 (Doc. 94), Paragraph 1, have complied with their discovery obligations. Those plaintiffs were ordered to answer a Questionnaire and Requests for Admission and serve them by e-mail no later than June 6, 2022. The defendant states that only Plaintiff Frazier has served responses and asks the Court to dismiss the other plaintiffs' claims with prejudice for failure to prosecute.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

84193412v.2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
TYLER ADAMS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM
INCORPORATED,
Defendant.
Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-11686

DEFENDANT MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED’S NOTICE OF
CERTAIN PLAINTIFFS’ NON-COMPLIANCE WITH NOTICE AND ORDER OF THE
COURT (DOC. 94) AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
Per this Court’s Notice and Order dated May 16, 2022, see Doc. 94 (“Notice and Order”),
Defendant Mass General Brigham Incorporated (“MGB”) hereby notifies this Court that, with the
exception of Plaintiff Laina Frazier, none of the plaintiffs listed in Paragraph 1 of the Notice and
Order have complied with their discovery obligations.
As this Court ordered, the Plaintiffs listed in Paragraph 1 of the Notice and Order were to
answer the Questionnaire (including but not limited to producing all requested documents) and
Requests for Admission that were approved by this Court (Dkt No. 72) on March 15, 2022.  Those
Plaintiffs were ordered to serve such discovery on the attorneys for MGB by e-mail no later than
June 6, 2022 at 5 P.M.  As of the filing of this notice, only Plaintiff Frazier has served any discovery
responses.  The remainder have neither served any discovery responses nor otherwise
communicated with MGB’s attorneys regarding their discovery responses.
Case 1:21-cv-11686-FDS   Document 98   Filed 06/07/22   Page 1 of 2

2
84193412v.2
Accordingly, MGB respectfully notifies this Court that, with the exception of Plaintiff
Frazier, the foregoing Plaintiffs have failed to provide discovery and have not complied with this
Court’s Notice and Order.  MGB respectfully requests that this Court dismiss those Plaintiffs’
claims with prejudice for failure to prosecute.
Dated:  June 7, 2022
 MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM
INCORPORATED
By Its Attorneys,
Respectfully Submitted,
 /s/ Dawn R. Solowey
Lynn A. Kappelman (BBO# 642017)
Katherine E. Perrelli (BBO# 549820)
Kristin McGurn (BBO# 559687)
Dawn Reddy Solowey (BBO# 567757)
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Seaport East
Two Seaport Lane, Suite 1200
Boston, MA 02210-2028
kperrelli@seyfarth.com
lkappelman@seyfarth.com
kmcgurn@seyfarth.com
dsolowey@seyfarth.com
TEL: (617) 946-4800
FAX: (617) 946-4801

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Dawn R. Solowey, certify that on June 7, 2022, I caused a true and accurate copy of the
foregoing document to be filed and uploaded to the CM/ECF system.
/s/ Dawn R. Solowey

Dawn R. Solowey

Case 1:21-cv-11686-FDS   Document 98   Filed 06/07/22   Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.mad.238919.98.0.pdf

Size

212,870 bytes

SHA-256

1605f2f11127e0e6fcf15226613fa0ae98f8e0c46180bcdd607ff1001677c64f

Our copy

gov.uscourts.mad.238919.98.0.pdf

Original

archive.org