Multiple Agency Fiscal Note Summary — 1173 2S HB, State Lands Development Auth
Summary
A Multiple Agency Fiscal Note Summary for Bill Number 1173 2S HB, titled State lands development auth, marked Final 3/18/2021 and prepared by Tyler Lentz, OFM. It is followed by individual state agency fiscal notes. The Office of the Governor and the Military Department each check No Fiscal Impact, while the Office of State Treasurer reports non-zero but indeterminate estimated cash receipts, noting that 2SHB 1173 creates the state lands development authority account. A Department of Commerce local government fiscal note on the Ballard-Interbay State Lands Development Authority states "No revenue impact" under its summary of the current bill.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Multiple Agency Fiscal Note Summary — 1173 2S HB, State Lands Development Auth.”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2022-02-17-a29814-d242760-1172-fn-final-03-18-21-804677889f/
, SHA-256 8408713897a423d9a16a18761b3657d3b9cd514b4b246de2f546d459bae21778.Full text
Multiple Agency Fiscal Note Summary
Bill Number: 1173 2S HB Title: State lands development auth
Estimated Cash Receipts
Agency Name 2021-23 2023-25 2025-27
GF-State NGF-Outlook Total GF-State NGF-Outlook Total GF-State NGF-Outlook Total
Office of State Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion.
Treasurer
Total $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Estimated Operating Expenditures
Agency Name 2021-23 2023-25 2025-27
FTEs GF-State NGF-Outlook Total FTEs GF-State NGF-Outlook Total FTEs GF-State NGF-Outlook Total
Office of the .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0
Governor
Office of State .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0
Treasurer
Military Department .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0
Total $ 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0
Agency Name 2021-23 2023-25 2025-27
FTEs GF-State Total FTEs GF-State Total FTEs GF-State Total
Local Gov. Courts
Loc School dist-SPI
Local Gov. Other Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion.
Local Gov. Total
Estimated Capital Budget Expenditures
Agency Name 2021-23 2023-25 2025-27
FTEs Bonds Total FTEs Bonds Total FTEs Bonds Total
Office of the Governor .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0
Office of State Treasurer .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0
Military Department .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0
Total $ 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0
Agency Name 2021-23 2023-25 2025-27
FTEs GF-State Total FTEs GF-State Total FTEs GF-State Total
Local Gov. Courts
Loc School dist-SPI
Local Gov. Other Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion.
Local Gov. Total
FNPID: 62899
FNS029 Multi Agency rollup
Estimated Capital Budget Breakout
NONE
Prepared by: Tyler Lentz, OFM Phone: Date Published:
(360) 790-0055 Final 3/18/2021
FNPID: 62899
FNS029 Multi Agency rollup
Individual State Agency Fiscal Note
Bill Number: 1173 2S HB Title: State lands development auth Agency: 075-Office of the
Governor
Part I: Estimates
X No Fiscal Impact
Estimated Cash Receipts to:
NONE
Estimated Operating Expenditures from:
NONE
Estimated Capital Budget Impact:
NONE
The cash receipts and expenditure estimates on this page represent the most likely fiscal impact. Factors impacting the precision of these estimates,
and alternate ranges (if appropriate), are explained in Part II.
Check applicable boxes and follow corresponding instructions:
If fiscal impact is greater than $50,000 per fiscal year in the current biennium or in subsequent biennia, complete entire fiscal note
form Parts I-V.
If fiscal impact is less than $50,000 per fiscal year in the current biennium or in subsequent biennia, complete this page only (Part I).
Capital budget impact, complete Part IV.
Requires new rule making, complete Part V.
Legislative Contact: Kellee Gunn Phone: 786-7429 Date: 03/09/2021
Agency Preparation: Jim Jenkins Phone: 360-902-0403 Date: 03/11/2021
Agency Approval: Jamie Langford Phone: (360) 870-7766 Date: 03/11/2021
OFM Review: Tyler Lentz Phone: (360) 790-0055 Date: 03/15/2021
Form FN (Rev 1/00) 167,950.00 Request # 094-1
FNS063 Individual State Agency Fiscal Note 1 Bill # 1173 2S HB
Part II: Narrative Explanation
II. A - Brief Description Of What The Measure Does That Has Fiscal Impact
Briefly describe by section number, the significant provisions of the bill, and any related workload or policy assumptions, that have revenue or
expenditure impact on the responding agency.
• Authorizes the establishment of State Lands Development Authorities in counties with a population of 2
million or greater to oversee and manage the development or redevelopment of state-owned property that is
within or adjacent to manufacturing industrial centers.
• The initial board of directors of a state lands development authority must be appointed by the governor upon
recommendation from the state legislative delegation from the district in which the boundaries of the state lands
development authority are contained.
• Authorizes the establishment of the Ballard-Interbay State Lands Development Authority on which a
representative of the Office of the Governor shall serve.
The work related to the requirements of this new version of the bill remain the same and can be done within
current resources by reprioritizing workload.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First substitute bill impact:
• This bill authorizes the establishment of State Lands Development Authorities to oversee and manage the
development or redevelopment of state-owned property that is within or adjacent to manufacturing industrial
centers.
• The initial board of directors of a state lands development authority must be appointed by the governor upon
recommendation from the state legislative delegation from the district in which the boundaries of the state lands
development authority are contained.
• Authorizes the establishment of the Ballard-Interbay State Lands Development Authority on which a
representative of the Office of the Governor shall serve.
The work related to the requirements of this bill can be done within current resources by reprioritizing workload.
II. B - Cash receipts Impact
Briefly describe and quantify the cash receipts impact of the legislation on the responding agency, identifying the cash receipts provisions by section
number and when appropriate the detail of the revenue sources. Briefly describe the factual basis of the assumptions and the method by which the
cash receipts impact is derived. Explain how workload assumptions translate into estimates. Distinguish between one time and ongoing functions.
II. C - Expenditures
Briefly describe the agency expenditures necessary to implement this legislation (or savings resulting from this legislation), identifying by section
number the provisions of the legislation that result in the expenditures (or savings). Briefly describe the factual basis of the assumptions and the
method by which the expenditure impact is derived. Explain how workload assumptions translate into cost estimates. Distinguish between one time
and ongoing functions.
Part III: Expenditure Detail
III. A - Operating Budget Expenditures
NONE
State lands development auth 075-Office of the Governor
Form FN (Rev 1/00) 167,950.00 Request # 094-1
FNS063 Individual State Agency Fiscal Note 2 Bill # 1173 2S HB
III. B - Expenditures by Object Or Purpose
NONE
III. C - Operating FTE Detail: List FTEs by classification and corresponding annual compensation. Totals need to agree with total FTEs in
Part I and Part IIIA
NONE
III. D - Expenditures By Program (optional)
NONE
Part IV: Capital Budget Impact
IV. A - Capital Budget Expenditures
NONE
IV. B - Expenditures by Object Or Purpose
NONE
IV. C - Capital Budget Breakout
Identify acquisition and construction costs not reflected elsewhere on the fiscal note and describe potential financing methods
NONE
IV. D - Capital FTE Detail: List FTEs by classification and corresponding annual compensation. Totals need to agree with total FTEs in
Part IVB
NONE
Part V: New Rule Making Required
State lands development auth 075-Office of the Governor
Form FN (Rev 1/00) 167,950.00 Request # 094-1
FNS063 Individual State Agency Fiscal Note 3 Bill # 1173 2S HB
Individual State Agency Fiscal Note
Bill Number: 1173 2S HB Title: State lands development auth Agency: 090-Office of State
Treasurer
Part I: Estimates
No Fiscal Impact
Estimated Cash Receipts to:
Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion.
Estimated Operating Expenditures from:
NONE
Estimated Capital Budget Impact:
NONE
The cash receipts and expenditure estimates on this page represent the most likely fiscal impact. Factors impacting the precision of these estimates,
and alternate ranges (if appropriate), are explained in Part II.
Check applicable boxes and follow corresponding instructions:
If fiscal impact is greater than $50,000 per fiscal year in the current biennium or in subsequent biennia, complete entire fiscal note
form Parts I-V.
X If fiscal impact is less than $50,000 per fiscal year in the current biennium or in subsequent biennia, complete this page only (Part I).
Capital budget impact, complete Part IV.
Requires new rule making, complete Part V.
Legislative Contact: Kellee Gunn Phone: 786-7429 Date: 03/09/2021
Agency Preparation: Dan Mason Phone: (360) 902-8990 Date: 03/09/2021
Agency Approval: Dan Mason Phone: (360) 902-8990 Date: 03/09/2021
OFM Review: Ramona Nabors Phone: (360) 902-0547 Date: 03/11/2021
Form FN (Rev 1/00) 167,944.00 Request # 085-1
FNS063 Individual State Agency Fiscal Note 1 Bill # 1173 2S HB
Part II: Narrative Explanation
II. A - Brief Description Of What The Measure Does That Has Fiscal Impact
Briefly describe by section number, the significant provisions of the bill, and any related workload or policy assumptions, that have revenue or
expenditure impact on the responding agency.
2SHB 1173 creates the state lands development authority account, coupled with the general fund as the recipient
of the earnings from investments under RCW 43.84.092(4).
II. B - Cash receipts Impact
Briefly describe and quantify the cash receipts impact of the legislation on the responding agency, identifying the cash receipts provisions by section
number and when appropriate the detail of the revenue sources. Briefly describe the factual basis of the assumptions and the method by which the
cash receipts impact is derived. Explain how workload assumptions translate into estimates. Distinguish between one time and ongoing functions.
Projected cash flows are currently unavailable; therefore, estimated earnings from investments are
indeterminable.
There may be an impact on the debt service limitation calculation. Any change to the earnings credited to the
general fund will change, by an equal amount, general state revenues.
II. C - Expenditures
Briefly describe the agency expenditures necessary to implement this legislation (or savings resulting from this legislation), identifying by section
number the provisions of the legislation that result in the expenditures (or savings). Briefly describe the factual basis of the assumptions and the
method by which the expenditure impact is derived. Explain how workload assumptions translate into cost estimates. Distinguish between one time
and ongoing functions.
Part III: Expenditure Detail
III. A - Operating Budget Expenditures
NONE
III. B - Expenditures by Object Or Purpose
NONE
III. C - Operating FTE Detail: List FTEs by classification and corresponding annual compensation. Totals need to agree with total FTEs in
Part I and Part IIIA
NONE
III. D - Expenditures By Program (optional)
NONE
Part IV: Capital Budget Impact
IV. A - Capital Budget Expenditures
NONE
IV. B - Expenditures by Object Or Purpose
NONE
IV. C - Capital Budget Breakout
Identify acquisition and construction costs not reflected elsewhere on the fiscal note and describe potential financing methods
NONE
State lands development auth 090-Office of State Treasurer
Form FN (Rev 1/00) 167,944.00 Request # 085-1
FNS063 Individual State Agency Fiscal Note 2 Bill # 1173 2S HB
IV. D - Capital FTE Detail: List FTEs by classification and corresponding annual compensation. Totals need to agree with total FTEs in
Part IVB
NONE
Part V: New Rule Making Required
State lands development auth 090-Office of State Treasurer
Form FN (Rev 1/00) 167,944.00 Request # 085-1
FNS063 Individual State Agency Fiscal Note 3 Bill # 1173 2S HB
Individual State Agency Fiscal Note
Bill Number: 1173 2S HB Title: State lands development auth Agency: 245-Military Department
Part I: Estimates
X No Fiscal Impact
Estimated Cash Receipts to:
NONE
Estimated Operating Expenditures from:
NONE
Estimated Capital Budget Impact:
NONE
The cash receipts and expenditure estimates on this page represent the most likely fiscal impact. Factors impacting the precision of these estimates,
and alternate ranges (if appropriate), are explained in Part II.
Check applicable boxes and follow corresponding instructions:
If fiscal impact is greater than $50,000 per fiscal year in the current biennium or in subsequent biennia, complete entire fiscal note
form Parts I-V.
If fiscal impact is less than $50,000 per fiscal year in the current biennium or in subsequent biennia, complete this page only (Part I).
Capital budget impact, complete Part IV.
Requires new rule making, complete Part V.
Legislative Contact: Kellee Gunn Phone: 786-7429 Date: 03/09/2021
Agency Preparation: Janet Pool Phone: 253-312-2756 Date: 03/11/2021
Agency Approval: Timothy Rajcevich Phone: 2535127596 Date: 03/11/2021
OFM Review: Carly Fa ataualofa Phone: (360) 790-7909 Date: 03/12/2021
Form FN (Rev 1/00) 168,194.00 Request # 11732SHB-1
FNS063 Individual State Agency Fiscal Note 1 Bill # 1173 2S HB
Part II: Narrative Explanation
II. A - Brief Description Of What The Measure Does That Has Fiscal Impact
Briefly describe by section number, the significant provisions of the bill, and any related workload or policy assumptions, that have revenue or
expenditure impact on the responding agency.
The Second Substitute bill has two (2) purposes:
• Sections 1-5: Authorization to establish State Lands Development Authorities (SLDAs) to oversee and
manage the development or redevelopment of state-owned property that is within or adjacent to manufacturing
industrial centers,
• Section 6: Authorization to establish the Ballard-Interbay SLDA.
II. B - Cash receipts Impact
Briefly describe and quantify the cash receipts impact of the legislation on the responding agency, identifying the cash receipts provisions by section
number and when appropriate the detail of the revenue sources. Briefly describe the factual basis of the assumptions and the method by which the
cash receipts impact is derived. Explain how workload assumptions translate into estimates. Distinguish between one time and ongoing functions.
II. C - Expenditures
Briefly describe the agency expenditures necessary to implement this legislation (or savings resulting from this legislation), identifying by section
number the provisions of the legislation that result in the expenditures (or savings). Briefly describe the factual basis of the assumptions and the
method by which the expenditure impact is derived. Explain how workload assumptions translate into cost estimates. Distinguish between one time
and ongoing functions.
The Military Department has no discernable responsibilities if this bill passes. Once the property is sold and no
longer state property, the Military Department releases all obligations. The Second Substitute bill removed the
original bill’s Military Department participation in the Ballard-Interbay State Lands Development Authority in
Section 6.
Part III: Expenditure Detail
III. A - Operating Budget Expenditures
NONE
III. B - Expenditures by Object Or Purpose
NONE
III. C - Operating FTE Detail: List FTEs by classification and corresponding annual compensation. Totals need to agree with total FTEs in
Part I and Part IIIA
NONE
III. D - Expenditures By Program (optional)
NONE
Part IV: Capital Budget Impact
IV. A - Capital Budget Expenditures
NONE
IV. B - Expenditures by Object Or Purpose
NONE
State lands development auth 245-Military Department
Form FN (Rev 1/00) 168,194.00 Request # 11732SHB-1
FNS063 Individual State Agency Fiscal Note 2 Bill # 1173 2S HB
IV. C - Capital Budget Breakout
Identify acquisition and construction costs not reflected elsewhere on the fiscal note and describe potential financing methods
NONE
IV. D - Capital FTE Detail: List FTEs by classification and corresponding annual compensation. Totals need to agree with total FTEs in
Part IVB
NONE
Part V: New Rule Making Required
State lands development auth 245-Military Department
Form FN (Rev 1/00) 168,194.00 Request # 11732SHB-1
FNS063 Individual State Agency Fiscal Note 3 Bill # 1173 2S HB
LOCAL GOVERNMENT FISCAL NOTE
Department of Commerce
Bill Number: 1173 2S HB Title: State lands development auth
Part I: Jurisdiction-Location, type or status of political subdivision defines range of fiscal impacts.
Legislation Impacts:
X Cities: One member of the Seattle City Council and Seattle Mayor’s Office and their participation in board decision making ,
planning, and public outreach, within in Ballard-Interbay State Land Development Authority (BISLDA) Board of Directors.
X Counties: One member of the King County Council in the same capacity as above.
X Special Districts: One member of the Port of Seattle in the same capacity as above.
X Specific jurisdictions only: Only affects one member of Seattle City Council, King County Council, City of Seattle Mayor’s Office,
and the Port of Seattle for appointment to the BISLDA Board of Directors.
Variance occurs due to:
Part II: Estimates
No fiscal impacts.
X Expenditures represent one-time costs: Costs associated with initial selection of the BISLDA Board of Directors; costs to produce
strategic plans.
X Legislation provides local option: Establishes the process to form a State Lands Development Authority under certain conditions ,
as a local option.
X Key variables cannot be estimated with certainty at this time: Variance in municipal, county, and port official’s involvement in
BISLDA Board of Directors’ activities; development and
redevelopment scenario choice made by BISLDA Board of Directors;
public involvement and public outreach costs for strategic plan
development.
Estimated revenue impacts to:
None
Estimated expenditure impacts to:
Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion.
Part III: Preparation and Approval
Fiscal Note Analyst: Jordan Laramie Phone: 360-725-5044 Date: 03/15/2021
Leg. Committee Contact: Kellee Gunn Phone: 786-7429 Date: 03/09/2021
Agency Approval: Allan Johnson Phone: 360-725-5033 Date: 03/15/2021
OFM Review: Myra Baldini Phone: (360) 688-8208 Date: 03/15/2021
Page 1 of 3 Bill Number: 1173 2S HB
FNS060 Local Government Fiscal Note
Part IV: Analysis
A. SUMMARY OF BILL
Provide a clear, succinct description of the bill with an emphasis on how it impacts local government .
AMENDED PROVISIONS FROM PRIOR BILL:
Sec. 1: Establishes the purpose and formation of State Land Development Authorities (Authorities).
(1) Provides an exemption from the formation of a State Land Development Authority on any property owned or managed by the
Department of Natural Resources.
(4) An Authority may only be formed in a county with a population of 2 million or greater .
Sec. 3: Establishes powers of the Authorities.
(1)(h) Authorities can incur debt towards its goals or mission but are expressly prohibited from incurring debt on behalf of the State of
Washington. The duty for a State Lands Development Authority to repay its debts does not constitute an obligation of the State of
Washington. State Lands Development Authorities are prohibited from using “general state revenues” to repay any borrowed funds .
SUMMARY OF CURRENT BILL:
This legislation would establish the process to form State Land Development Authorities (Authorities) as well as the powers and duties of
these Authorities, in order to create the Ballard-Interbay State Lands Development Authority (BISLDA). These Authorities are authorized
to oversee and manage the development and redevelopment of state-owned property that is within , or adjacent to, manufacturing industrial
centers. Formation of a State Lands Development Authority is subject to legislative authorization by statute . The selection of an
Authorities’ Board of Directors (Board) can only be formed by the governor upon recommendation from legislative delegation from a
district containing state-owned land which is adjacent to, or within, a manufacturing industrial center. Subsequent Board members would
be selected by the governor through a list of candidates chosen by existing Board members .
B. SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURE IMPACTS
Briefly describe and quantify the expenditure impacts of the legislation on local governments , identifying the expenditure provisions by
section number, and when appropriate, the detail of expenditures. Delineate between city, county and special district impacts.
CHANGE FROM PRIOR BILL:
No change from prior bill expenditure impact.
This bill provides exemptions for which state lands a State Lands Development Authority (Authority) may be established , as well as, the
population size of the county where they can be established . This legislation also details that debts incurred by the Authority are not
obligations of the State of Washington, and no general fund revenue may be used to satisfy the Authority’s outstanding obligations .
SUMMARY OF CURRENT BILL:
The proposed bill provides a local option to form State Lands Development Authorities (Authorities) and it does not require local
governments to create these Authorities. However, this legislation would create the Ballard-Interbay State Lands Development Authority
(BISLDA) and the formation of the BISLDA would have indeterminate expenditures as a result of this bill . Standing-up the BISLDA
would have costs related to managing and creating a strategic plan for the project until the National Guard moves to a new location , after
which, development or redevelopment plans could proceed. The cost for elected local government officials to attend the BISLDA
meetings is estimated to be less than $10,000 per year for the four appointed members. The legislature intends to appropriately fund and
staff the BISDLA for the goals established in this legislation.
BOARD WOULD BE APPROPRIATELY FUNDED BY THE LEGISLATURE:
Sec. 6(1)(b) establishes that the legislature intend for the Ballard-Interbay State Lands Development Authority (BISLDA) to be
appropriately funded and staffed.
STAFFING COSTS FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT MEMBERS OF THE BISLDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS :
The local government members of the BISLDA Board of Directors (Board), would be represented by one-member of the following: the
Port of Seattle, the King County Council, the City of Seattle Mayor’s Office, and the Seattle City Council. These members may have the
following costs to participate in board activities and create the strategic plan outlined in Sec . 4:
Sec. 3(1)(b) authorizes the special purpose government to employ their own staff for work related to the goals of the Authority . The
number of staff and the resources they may be able to provide to Board member is not yet known . However, Board members might choose
to have their existing personal staff support them logistically, which could have costs ranging from de minimis to more substantive. These
costs would depend on the scope of work involved with Board activities such creating the BISLDA’s strategic plan outlined in Sec . 4(4)
and drafting the BISLDA biennial report per Sec. 4(6). These would be additional costs to the local governments if the staff of the Board
Page 2 of 3 Bill Number: 1173 2S HB
FNS060 Local Government Fiscal Note
member were used in this way.
A Board member might wish to task personal staff with analysis beyond what the Authority has supplied . In instances where work on this
kind of endeavor is substantive there could be costs for a couple of hours a month of Board member’s personal staff analysis and
preparations for Board activities. This would also include any parking, printing, or similarly related ancillary expenditures needed perform
the work to support the Board member.
MEETING ATTENDANCE COSTS:
The staff costs for the local government BISLDA Board members to attend meetings may be less than $10 ,000 per year, for members from
the Port of Seattle, the King County Council, the City of Seattle Mayor’s Office, and the Seattle City Council.
The King County staff that work on the board of directors for the Historic South Downtown Community Preservation & Development
Authority and the Central District Development & Preservation Authority in King County reported that they spend around 4-6 hours a
month on this type of work. The staff costs would translate to approximately $60.00/hour, or $240.00 - $360.00 a month per county board
member. Adding parking costs for monthly meetings for Board members could be $25 .00 a month, or $300.00 a year.
The staff hours and costs would be consistent with the meeting assumptions from the Washington State Military Department , who assume
in their fiscal note for HB 1173 (2021), that meetings related to the provisions of this legislation would be once per month and
approximately 3-hours in length.
If similar costs existed for all four local government Board member positions, the staff time for meetings could be:
(($60.00/hour x 3 hours) + $25.00 parking fees) = $205.00/meeting, per member
$205.00/meeting x 12 meetings = $2,460.00/year, per member
$2,460.00 x 4 local government Board members = $9,840 for 4 local government Board members to attend 1-years’ worth of BISLDA
Board meetings.
C. SUMMARY OF REVENUE IMPACTS
Briefly describe and quantify the revenue impacts of the legislation on local governments , identifying the revenue provisions by section
number, and when appropriate, the detail of revenue sources. Delineate between city, county and special district impacts.
CHANGE FROM PRIOR BILL
No changes would alter the previous finding of no impact.
SUMMARY OF CURRENT BILL:
No revenue impact.
This legislation does have a change to Sec. 6(1)(b) which establishes that the legislature intends for the Ballard-Interbay State Lands
Development Authority (BISLDA) to be appropriately funded and staffed. Any appropriations made by the legislature would be used to
fund and staff the BISLDA’s Board of Directors and fulfill the obligations of this legislation. This would not result in any local
government revenue impacts.
SOURCES:
Department of Commerce, Research Services
Department of Commerce, Interbay Project: Interbay Public Development Advisory Committee’s Recommendations and Implementation
Plan (2019)
ESSB 6095 Sec. 1004 2018 c 2 s 1016 (2018)
King County, Office of Performance, Strategy and Budget
Local Government Fiscal Note Program, FN HB 1992 (2007)
Local Government Fiscal Note Program, FN HB 1989 (2019)
MRSC, Public Development Authorities
Washington State Military Department, FN 1173 (2021)
Page 3 of 3 Bill Number: 1173 2S HB
FNS060 Local Government Fiscal Note
File and source
- File
- 2022-02-17_a29814_d242760_1172-fn-final-03-18-21.pdf
- Size
- 444,999 bytes
- SHA-256
- 8408713897a423d9a16a18761b3657d3b9cd514b4b246de2f546d459bae21778
- Original
- No public link identified.