Protective Order — Air Force Officer v. Austin (Case No. 5:22-cv-00009-TES, Document 29)
- Date
- 2022-01-21
Summary
A protective order entered January 21, 2022 as Document 29 in Air Force Officer v. Lloyd J. Austin, III, et al., Case No. 5:22-cv-00009-TES, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Macon Division. Entered on the parties' joint request under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), pending a ruling on Plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously (Dkt. #3), it provides for Plaintiff's counsel to give Defendants' counsel her identifying information and unredacted filings. The order limits who may receive that information, restricts its use to this litigation, and requires persons employed by Defendants to sign an Acknowledgement and Agreement to be Bound. A party filing the information must redact it and use the pseudonym or move to seal under Local Rule 5.4, and any party may seek modification after conferring. The 3-page order is signed by Judge Tilman E. Self, III.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Protective Order — Air Force Officer v. Austin (Case No. 5:22-cv-00009-TES, Document 29).”
Original at archive.org, dated 2022-01-21. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2022-01-21-covid-era-misc/
, SHA-256 d849cc210720896def69d2b95701024f91a00c6abd2f4cbe8fc7a247f76e95bb.Full text
Case 5:22-cv-00009-TES Document 29 Filed 01/21/22 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
AIR FORCE OFFICER, )
) Case No. 5:22-cv-00009-TES
Plaintiff, )
v. )
)
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, individually and in his )
official capacity as Secretary of Defense; )
FRANK KENDALL, III, individually and in his )
official capacity as Secretary of the Air Force; and )
ROBERT I. MILLER, individually and in his )
official capacity as Surgeon General of the )
Air Force, )
)
Defendants. )
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Upon the joint request of the parties in the above-captioned matter, pending adjudication
of the Plaintiff’s motion to proceed anonymously, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 26(c), the Court hereby enters the following protective order, jointly agreed and
proposed by the parties, to provide a mechanism for Plaintiff, who currently has moved to
proceed in this action through the pseudonym “Air Force Officer,” to disclose her identity to
Defendants before final resolution of that motion by the Court. 1
1. Provision of Plaintiff’s Identity and Unredacted Filings to Defendants. Upon entry
of this protective order, Plaintiff, through her counsel, will provide her name (“Name”), her
address (“Address”), and unredacted copies of any redacted documents that have been filed in
1
Entry of this protective order does not deprive Defendants of the opportunity to file an opposition to Plaintiff’s
Motion for Leave to Proceed Anonymously, Dkt. #3.
Case 5:22-cv-00009-TES Document 29 Filed 01/21/22 Page 2 of 3
this matter (“Unredacted Documents”) (Name, Address, and Unredacted Documents,
collectively, “Identifying Information”), to Defendants’ counsel of record.
2. Limited Dissemination of Plaintiff’s Identity. The following persons may receive
Identifying Information: (a) counsel for Defendants, including supervisory officials at the
Department of Justice and agency counsel for Defendants; (b) persons regularly in the employ of
counsel for Defendants directly assisting such counsel in the defense of this litigation and who
have been advised by such counsel of their obligations hereunder; and (c) persons regularly in
the employ of Defendants who are actually engaged in the preparation of this litigation for trial
or other proceedings herein, provided that such persons agree to and sign the attached
Acknowledgement and Agreement to be Bound (Appendix A). Counsel for Defendants shall
maintain copies of all signed Acknowledgments and Agreements to be Bound.
3. Permissible Uses of Plaintiff’s Identity. Any person receiving any Identifying
Information pursuant to this Protective Order (“Recipient”) shall use that information only for
purposes of this litigation and shall not disclose Plaintiff’s Identifying Information to anyone
except persons permitted under Paragraph 2 to receive it, absent court order.
4. Scope of the Protective Order. This protective order does not alter the
requirements of Middle District of Georgia Local Rule 5.4. If any party wishes to use any
document containing Identifying Information or other personal information that would lead to
the discovery of her identity in a court filing or proceeding in this action, they shall either (i)
redact Plaintiff’s name and other personal information and utilize Plaintiff’s assigned
pseudonym, or (ii) file a motion to seal pursuant to Middle District of Georgia Local Rule 5.4.
5. Modifications. Each party reserves the right to seek to modify the terms of this
protective order at any time. If a party seeks to modify this protective order, the counsel for the
2
Case 5:22-cv-00009-TES Document 29 Filed 01/21/22 Page 3 of 3
party seeking to modify the protective order shall confer with counsel for all other parties to this
action.
IT SO ORDERED, this 21st day of January, 2022.
S/ Tilman E. Self, III
TILMAN E. SELF, III, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.gamd.123364.29.0.pdf
- Size
- 155,383 bytes
- SHA-256
- d849cc210720896def69d2b95701024f91a00c6abd2f4cbe8fc7a247f76e95bb
- Original
- archive.org