Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (Antitrust Actions) (Dkt. 444)

Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (Antitrust Actions) — In re January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation (Dkt. 444, S.D. Fla.)

Summary

Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time in In re: January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation, Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA (Case No. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres, Document 444, 3 pages), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, entered November 29, 2021, relating to the Antitrust Actions. The Antitrust Plaintiffs ask for a thirty-day extension of the December 20, 2021 deadline [ECF No. 438] to file an amended complaint, to January 20, 2022. Co-lead counsel Joseph Saveri Law Firm is in a jury trial in In re Capacitors Antitrust Litig. beginning November 29, 2021 and expected to last approximately four (4) weeks.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Date
2021-12-20

Cite this document

“Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (Antitrust Actions) (Dkt. 444).” Original at archive.org, dated 2021-12-20. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2021-12-20-covid-era-misc/, SHA-256 bf2296eb4ab12d86bf491dadb7f3e8fcc6a5bf36f35c09234abbd5fb52e8f0db.

Full text

Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 444 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/29/2021 Page 1 of 3




                                 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

                             CASE NO. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres

 IN RE:

 JANUARY 2021 SHORT SQUEEZE
 TRADING LITIGATION
 ____________________________________/

 This Document Relates to the Antitrust Actions

                PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

          Plaintiffs in the Antitrust Actions (“Antitrust Plaintiffs”) by and through their undersigned

 counsel, respectfully submit this unopposed motion for a thirty-day extension to file an amended

 complaint in the Antitrust Tranche of this Multidistrict Litigation. The Court ordered that an amended

 complaint be filed by December 20, 2021 [ECF No. 438]. Antitrust Plaintiffs respectfully request that

 their time be extended to January 20, 2022.

          In support, Antitrust Plaintiffs state as follows:

          1.      This motion is brought because of a planned trial that co-lead counsel for the Antitrust

 Plaintiffs, the Joseph Saveri Law Firm (“JSLF”), are engaged in beginning on November 29, 2021.

 JSLF expects the trial to last approximately four (4) weeks.

          2.      The Antitrust Plaintiffs advised the Court and the Defendants that JSLF will be in a

 multi-week jury trial, In re Capacitors Antitrust Litig., No. 17-md-02801, beginning on November 29,

 2021 in the “Joint Status Report” filed with the Court on June 2, 2021 (ECF No. 322, fn. 1).

          3.      A one-month extension will permit JSLF to complete the trial and diligently work with

 its co-lead counsel, Hach Rose Schirripa & Cheverie, LLP on drafting an amended complaint that

 addresses the Court’s concerns and issues raised in its Order Dismissing The Corrected Consolidated

 Class Action Complaint [ECF No. 438].
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 444 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/29/2021 Page 2 of 3




        WHEREFORE, Antitrust Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court enter an order granting a

 one-month extension of time to January 20, 2022 file an amended complaint.

                        CERTIFICATE OF GOOD FAITH CONFERENCE

        Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(a)(3)(A) and (B), Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel for the Antitrust

 Tranche hereby certifies that on November 24, 2021, they attempted to confer via email with all counsel

 of record for Defendants, who may be affected by the relief sought in this Motion. Counsel for

 Defendants Robinhood, Citadel Securities, Apex Financial, and E*Trade responded that their clients

 take no position with respect to the requested relief. Counsel for the remaining Defendants did not

 respond or raise any opposition to the Motion.

 Dated: November 29, 2021
                                                   Respectfully submitted,
  /s/ Joseph R. Saveri                             /s/ Frank R. Schirripa
  JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM, LLP                      HACH ROSE SCHIRRIPA &
  Joseph R. Saveri (CA SBN 130064)                 CHEVERIE LLP
  Steven N. Williams (CA SBN 175489)               Frank Schirripa (NY SBN 4103750)
  Anupama K. Reddy (CA SBN 324873)                 Kathryn Hettler (NY SBN 5126065)
  Christopher K.L Young (CA SBN 318371)            Seth Pavsner (NY SBN 4969689)
  601 California Street, Suite 1000                Eugene Zaydfudim (NY SBN 5204334)
  San Francisco, CA 94108                          112 Madison Ave, 10th Floor
  Tel: (415) 500-6800                              New York, New York 10016
  jsaveri@saverilawfirm.com                        Tel: (212) 213-8311
  swilliams@saverilawfirm.com                      fschirripa@hrsclaw.com
  areddy@saverilawfirm.com                         khettler@hrsclaw.com
  cyoung@saverilawfirm.com                         SPavsner@hrsclaw.com
                                                   ezaydfudim@hrsclaw.com
  Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel
                                                   Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel
  /s/ Rachel W. Furst
  GROSSMAN ROTH YAFFA COHEN, P.A.
  Rachel W. Furst (FBN 45155)
  2525 Ponce de Leon Blvd., Ste 1150
  Coral Gables, FL 33134-6040
  Tel: 305-442-8666
  rwf@grossmanroth.com

  Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel

                                                   2
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 444 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/29/2021 Page 3 of 3




                                    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
        I HEREBY CERTIFY that, on November 29, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing

 document with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF filing system. I further certify that this motion

 was served on all counsel of record via transmission of the Notice of Electronic Filing generated by the

 Court’s CM/ECF system.

                                                        By: /s/ Rachel W. Furst
                                                            Rachel Wagner Furst




                                                    3


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flsd.590042.444.0.pdf
Size
220,812 bytes
SHA-256
bf2296eb4ab12d86bf491dadb7f3e8fcc6a5bf36f35c09234abbd5fb52e8f0db
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flsd.590042.444.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top