Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Pursuant to pre vious Court Orders (ECF Nos. 16, 19), th e Parties

Pursuant to pre vious Court Orders (ECF Nos. 16, 19), th e Parties

Summary

In Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency v. Food and Drug Administration, No. 4:21-cv-1058-P, the Court in the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division, orders a scheduling conference. It says that, having considered two Joint Reports the parties submitted under previous Court Orders, it concludes a scheduling conference to discuss a processing schedule is necessary. The conference is set for 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, December 14, 2021, in the Fourth Floor Courtroom of the Eldon B. Mahon United States Courthouse in Fort Worth, Texas. The parties may file briefs or appendices on or before December 6, 2021, and the other party may respond on or before December 13, 2021. The order is dated the 18th day of November, 2021, and names Judge Mark T. Pittman.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Date
2021-12-14

Cite this document

“Pursuant to pre vious Court Orders (ECF Nos. 16, 19), th e Parties.” Original at archive.org, dated 2021-12-14. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2021-12-14-plaintiff-v-no-4/, SHA-256 1ddf20d3aa52ed1dfb5f61c39b084e45a1aeeec275d89cdae2c53498160ae91b.

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION

PUBLIC HEALTH AND MEDICAL
PROFESSIONALS FOR TRANSPARENCY,

Plaintiff,

v.

No. 4:21-cv-1058-P
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

ORDER
Pursuant to previous Court Orders (ECF Nos. 16, 19), the Parties
have now submitted two Joint Reports. See ECF Nos. 18, 20. Having
considered the Joint Reports, the Court concludes that a scheduling
conference to discuss a processing schedule is necessary.
The Court therefore ORDERS that a scheduling conference
regarding the instant dispute will be held at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday,
December 14, 2021, in the Fourth Floor Courtroom of the Eldon B.
Mahon United States Courthouse, located at 501 W. 10th Street, Fort
Worth, Texas.
Should the Parties like to file briefs and/or appendices to assist the
Court in its preparation for the scheduling conference, the Parties must
file on or before December 6, 2021. If either Party files a brief and/or
appendix, the other Party may file a response brief and/or appendix on
or before December 13, 2021.
SO ORDERED on this 18th day of November, 2021.

Mark T. Pittman
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 4:21-cv-01058-P   Document 21   Filed 11/18/21    Page 1 of 1   PageID 220
Case 4:21-cv-01058-P   Document 21   Filed 11/18/21    Page 1 of 1   PageID 220

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.txnd.353278.21.0.pdf
Size
141,882 bytes
SHA-256
1ddf20d3aa52ed1dfb5f61c39b084e45a1aeeec275d89cdae2c53498160ae91b
Our copy
gov.uscourts.txnd.353278.21.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
  1. Scheduling order (production schedule) — PHMPT v. FDAsame docket · 2022-01-06
  2. FDA reply brief in advance of scheduling conference — PHMPT v. FDAsame docket · 2021-12-13
  3. Brief in Support of Timely Productionsame docket · 2021-12-07
  4. FDA memorandum supporting motion to modify scheduling order — PHMPT v. FDAsame docket · 2022-01-18
  5. Appendix in Support of Brief for Timely Production — PHMPT v. FDAsame docket · 2021-12-07
  6. FDA's motion to partially modify scheduling order — PHMPT v. FDAsame docket · 2022-01-18
  7. Exhibit A — Case 4:21-cv-01058-P, Document 23, Filed 12/06/21 (App001)same docket · 2021-12-06
  8. Second Declaration of Suzann Burk (FDA) — PHMPT v. FDAsame docket · 2022-01-18
  9. FDA brief in advance of scheduling conference — PHMPT v. FDAsame docket · 2021-12-06
  10. Pfizer memorandum supporting motion to intervene — PHMPT v. FDAsame docket · 2022-01-21
  11. Plaintiff's brief in support of timely production — PHMPT v. FDAsame docket · 2021-12-06
  12. Pfizer Motion for Leave to Intervene — PHMPT v. FDAsame docket · 2022-01-21
  13. FDA Response to Pfizer Motion to Intervene — PHMPT v. FDAsame docket · 2022-01-24
  14. Second Joint Report — PHMPT v. FDAsame docket · 2021-11-15
  15. Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Modify Scheduling Order — PHMPT v. FDAsame docket · 2022-01-24
  16. First Joint Report — PHMPT v. FDAsame docket · 2021-11-05
  17. Plaintiff's response to Pfizer's motion to intervene — PHMPT v. FDAsame docket · 2022-01-25
  18. Order setting scheduling conference — Phmpt v. FDA (N.D. Tex.)same docket · 2021-10-18
  19. Before the Court is Pfizer Inc. ’s Motion for Leave to Interven e for asame docket · 2022-01-25
  20. FDA's answer to complaint — PHMPT v. FDAsame docket · 2021-10-18

Part of: Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency v. Food and Drug Administration · Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency v. Food and Drug Administration · Other pandemic litigation · Federal court dockets (PACER) · 2021 · Source documents

Back to top