Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Rule-Making Order, Emergency Rule Only — CR-103E (October 2017), Code Reviser

Rule-Making Order, Emergency Rule Only — CR-103E (October 2017), Code Reviser

Summary

A rule-making order, form CR-103E, for an emergency rule of the Office of the Insurance Commissioner, Matter Number R 2021-02, effective immediately upon filing. The stated purpose is temporarily prohibiting the use of credit history to determine premiums and eligibility for coverage in private automobile, homeowners, and renter's insurance products. The order lists new rules WAC 284-24A-088 and 284-24A-089 and its reasons, which refer to Proclamation 20-05 and to Sections 4021 and 4022 of the CARES Act. The rule text states that its prohibitions apply to all new policies, and to existing policies processed for renewal, on or after June 20, 2021, and that insurers must submit rate filings by May 6, 2021.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Rule-Making Order, Emergency Rule Only — CR-103E (October 2017), Code Reviser.” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2021-09-21-a29208-d236163-oic-emergency-rule-materials-9013625f4f/, SHA-256 df863e38b0735ea5b701de0fc5e4dfba93353c895eac2df653cbbe1c83a917ac.

Full text

                                                                                          CODE REVISER USE ONLY

                         RULE-MAKING ORDER                                                OFHCE OF THE CODE REVISER
                                                                                            STATE OF WASHIINGTON
                           EMERGENCY RULE ONLY                                                     FIILED

                                                                                     DATE : March 22 1, 2021
                        CR-103E (October 2017)                                       TIME: 112:45, PM
                       (Implements RCW 34.05.350
                                                                                     WSR 2 1-07-1103
                             and 34.05.360)
Agency: Office of the Insurance Commissioner
Effective date of rule:
   Emergency Rules
   ☒ Immediately upon filing.
   ☐ Later (specify)
Any other findings required by other provisions of law as precondition to adoption or effectiveness of rule?
  ☐ Yes ☒ No If Yes, explain:
Purpose: Temporarily prohibiting the use of credit history to determine premiums and eligibility for coverage in private
automobile, homeowners, and renter’s insurance products.


Insurance Commissioner Matter Number: R 2021-02
Citation of rules affected by this order:
   New:         WAC 284-24A-088, 284-24A-089
   Repealed:
   Amended:
   Suspended:
Statutory authority for adoption: RCW 48.02.060, 48.18.480, 48.19.020, 48.19.035, 48.19.080
Other authority: None
EMERGENCY RULE
  Under RCW 34.05.350 the agency for good cause finds:
  ☒ That immediate adoption, amendment, or repeal of a rule is necessary for the preservation of the public health,
      safety, or general welfare, and that observing the time requirements of notice and opportunity to comment upon
      adoption of a permanent rule would be contrary to the public interest.
  ☐ That state or federal law or federal rule or a federal deadline for state receipt of federal funds requires immediate
      adoption of a rule.
Reasons for this finding: The Commissioner is tasked with ensuring that insurance rates are not excessive,
inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory, and with enacting rules that ensure the use of credit history and credit
history factors in setting insurance premiums is not excessive, inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory.

Insurance companies which use credit-based insurance scoring claim that credit scoring is a predictive tool to
identify risk of loss from a specific consumer. This credit-based insurance score is then used to determine
premiums charged to each consumer.

On February 29, 2020, the Governor of the State of Washington issued Proclamation 20-05, proclaiming a State of
Emergency throughout the state of Washington as a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak
in the United States. On March 13, 2020 under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) the
President of the United States declared a national emergency concerning the novel coronavirus disease (COVID–
19) outbreak in the United States. Addressing the state of emergency caused by the coronavirus pandemic has
required difficult steps that have had a severe financial impact on large groups within our state.

In part to mitigate the financial impacts of the COVID 19 pandemic to individual households, on March 27, 2020,
the President of the United States signed the CARES Act (P.L. 116-136). Section 4021 of the CARES Act
addresses credit reporting during the pandemic. The CARES Act requires financial institutions to report consumers
                                                          Page 1 of 3
as current if they were not previously delinquent or, for consumers that were previously delinquent, not to advance
the level of delinquency, for credit obligations for which the furnisher makes payment accommodations to
consumers affected by COVID-19 and the consumer makes any payments the accommodation requires. Section
4022 of the CARES Act requires certain lenders to offer forbearance options to borrowers, and imposed a
moratorium on foreclosures for certain home loans. In addition, section 3513 of the CARES Act specifically
addresses the furnishing of federally-held student loans for which payments are suspended. This provision results
in all non-defaulted federally-held student loans being reported as current.

In addition, the Governor of the State of Washington has issued several emergency proclamations limiting state
agencies from charging late fees and penalties, and placing a moratorium on garnishment actions (Emergency
Proclamation 20-49, and subsequent amendments) and evictions (Emergency Proclamation 20-19, and subsequent
amendments). The critical consumer protections included in these proclamations have also had the effect of
preventing creditors from taking actions that are otherwise reportable on a consumer’s credit history.

The result of the CARES Act is that all credit bureaus are collecting a credit history that is objectively inaccurate
for some consumers and therefore results in an unreliable credit score being assigned to them. Consequently, this
untrustworthy credit score degrades any predicative value that may be found in a consumer’s credit-based
insurance score.

The Commissioner finds that the current protections to consumer credit history at the state and federal level have
disrupted the credit reporting process. This disruption has caused credit-based insurance scoring models to be
unreliable and therefore inaccurate when applied to produce a premium amount for an insurance consumer in
Washington state. This makes the use of currently filed credit based insurance scoring models unfairly
discriminatory within the meaning of RCW 48.19.020.

There is evidence that the negative economic impacts of the pandemic have disproportionately fallen on people of
color. Therefore, when the CARES Act protections are eliminated, and negative credit information can be fully
reported again, credit histories for people of color will have been disproportionately eroded by the pandemic.

Remaining consumer credit protections in the CARES Act will expire after the national state of emergency. When
the CARES Act fully expires, a large volume of negative credit corrections will flood consumer credit histories.
This flood of negative credit history has not been accounted for in the current credit scoring models. Without data
to demonstrate that the predictive ability of credit scoring models based on pre-pandemic credit and claims
histories is unchanged, the predicative ability of current credit scoring models cannot be assumed. This will make
the use of currently filed credit based insurance scoring models unfairly discriminatory within the meaning of
RCW 48.19.020.

It is impossible to know precisely when the state and federal states of emergency will end. Insurance companies
must have an alternative to the currently unreliable credit scoring models they have in place before the protections
of the CARES Act end. Therefore, it is necessary to immediately implement changes to the use of credit scoring.




                                                       Page 2 of 3
              Note: If any category is left blank, it will be calculated as zero.
                    No descriptive text.
                Count by whole WAC sections only, from the WAC number through the history note.
                              A section may be counted in more than one category.

The number of sections adopted in order to comply with:
                                    Federal statute:   New     -        Amended   -       Repealed -
                        Federal rules or standards:    New     -        Amended   -       Repealed -
                  Recently enacted state statutes:     New     -        Amended   -       Repealed -


The number of sections adopted at the request of a nongovernmental entity:
                                                       New     -        Amended   -       Repealed   -

The number of sections adopted on the agency’s own initiative:
                                                       New         -2   Amended   -       Repealed   -

The number of sections adopted in order to clarify, streamline, or reform agency procedures:
                                                       New     -        Amended   -       Repealed   -

The number of sections adopted using:
                           Negotiated rule making:     New     -        Amended   -       Repealed   -
                                  Pilot rule making:   New     -        Amended   -       Repealed   -
                      Other alternative rule making:   New         -2   Amended   -       Repealed


Date Adopted: March 22, 2021                               Signature:

Name: Mike Kreidler

Title: Insurance Commissioner
                                                                        orrL ~




                                                       Page 3 of 3
New section: WAC 284-24A-88 Findings and intent of temporary prohibition

(1) The Commissioner is tasked with ensuring that insurance rates are not excessive, inadequate,
or unfairly discriminatory, and with enacting rules that ensure the use of credit history and credit
history factors in setting insurance premiums is not excessive, inadequate, or unfairly
discriminatory.

(2) Insurance companies which use credit-based insurance scoring claim that credit scoring is a
predictive tool to identify risk of loss from a specific consumer. This credit-based insurance
score is then used to determine premiums charged to each consumer.

(3) On February 29, 2020, the Governor of the State of Washington issued Proclamation 20-05,
proclaiming a State of Emergency throughout the state of Washington as a result of the
coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in the United States. On March 13, 2020 under
the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) the President of the United States
declared a national emergency concerning the novel coronavirus disease (COVID–19) outbreak
in the United States. Addressing the state of emergency caused by the coronavirus pandemic has
required difficult steps that have had a severe financial impact on large groups within our state.

(4) In part to mitigate the financial impacts of the COVID 19 pandemic to individual households,
on March 27, 2020, the President of the United States signed the CARES Act (P.L. 116-136).
Section 4021 of the CARES Act addresses credit reporting during the pandemic. The CARES
Act requires financial institutions to report consumers as current if they were not previously
delinquent or, for consumers that were previously delinquent, not to advance the level of
delinquency, for credit obligations for which the furnisher makes payment accommodations to
consumers affected by COVID-19 and the consumer makes any payments the accommodation
requires. Section 4022 of the CARES Act requires certain lenders to offer forbearance options to
borrowers, and imposed a moratorium on foreclosures for certain home loans. In addition,
section 3513 of the CARES Act specifically addresses the furnishing of federally-held student
loans for which payments are suspended. This provision results in all non-defaulted federally-
held student loans being reported as current.

(5) In addition, the Governor of the State of Washington has issued several emergency
proclamations limiting state agencies from charging late fees and penalties, and placing a
moratorium on garnishment actions (Emergency Proclamation 20-49, and subsequent
amendments) and evictions (Emergency Proclamation 20-19, and subsequent amendments). The
critical consumer protections included in these proclamations have also had the effect of
preventing creditors from taking actions that are otherwise reportable on a consumer’s credit
history.

(6) The result of the CARES Act is that all credit bureaus are collecting a credit history that is
objectively inaccurate for some consumers and therefore results in an unreliable credit score
being assigned to them. Consequently, this untrustworthy credit score degrades any predicative
value that may be found in a consumer’s credit-based insurance score.
(7) The Commissioner finds that the current protections to consumer credit history at the state
and federal level have disrupted the credit reporting process. This disruption has caused credit-
based insurance scoring models to be unreliable and therefore inaccurate when applied to
produce a premium amount for an insurance consumer in Washington state. This makes the use
of currently filed credit based insurance scoring models unfairly discriminatory within the
meaning of RCW 48.19.020.

(8) There is evidence that the negative economic impacts of the pandemic have
disproportionately fallen on people of color. Therefore, when the CARES Act protections are
eliminated, and negative credit information can be fully reported again, credit histories for
people of color will have been disproportionately eroded by the pandemic.

(9) Remaining consumer credit protections in the CARES Act will expire after the national state
of emergency. When the CARES Act fully expires, a large volume of negative credit corrections
will flood consumer credit histories. This flood of negative credit history has not been accounted
for in the current credit scoring models. Without data to demonstrate that the predictive ability
of credit scoring models based on pre-pandemic credit and claims histories is unchanged, the
predicative ability of current credit scoring models cannot be assumed. This will make the use of
currently filed credit based insurance scoring models unfairly discriminatory within the meaning
of RCW 48.19.020.

(10) It is impossible to know precisely when the state and federal states of emergency will end.
Insurance companies must have an alternative to the currently unreliable credit scoring models
they have in place before the protections of the CARES Act end. Therefore, it is necessary to
immediately implement changes to the use of credit scoring.


New section: WAC 284-24A-89 Temporary prohibition of use of credit history

(1) Not withstanding any other provision of this chapter, this section applies to all personal
insurance pertaining to private passenger automobile coverage, renter’s coverage, and
homeowner’s coverage issued in the state of Washington while this rule is effective.

(2) The insurance commissioner finds that as a result of the broad negative economic impact of
the coronavirus pandemic, the disproportionately negative economic impact the coronavirus
pandemic has had on communities of color, and the disruption to credit reporting caused by both
the state and federal consumer protections designed to alleviate the economic impacts of the
pandemic, for private passenger automobile coverage, renter’s coverage, and homeowner’s
coverage issued in the state of Washington, the use of insurance credit scores results in premiums
that are excessive, inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory within the meaning of RCW 48.19.020
and RCW 48.18.480.

(3) For all private passenger automobile coverage, renter’s coverage, and homeowner’s coverage
issued in the state of Washington, insurers shall not use credit history to determine personal
insurance rates, premiums, or eligibility for coverage.
(4) For purposes of this section, insurers shall not use credit history to place insurance coverage
with a particular affiliated insurer or insurer within an overall group of affiliated insurance
companies.

(5) In order to comply with this section, insurers subject to this rule may substitute any insurance
credit score factor used in a rate filing with a neutral rating factor.
(a) For purposes of this section, “neutral factor” means a single constant factor calculated such
that, when it is applied in lieu of insurance-score-base rating factors to all policies in an insurer’s
book of business, the total premium for the book of business is unchanged.
(b) For purposes of this section, insurers may, but are not required to, implement the neutral
factor by peril or coverage.

(6) Insurers may not include rate stability rules in filings submitted to comply with this section.

(7) The prohibitions in this rule shall apply to all new policies effective and existing policies
processed for renewal on or after June 20, 2021. Each insurer must submit rate filings to amend
its current rating plans with the insurance commissioner for all insurance policies covered by this
rule by May 6, 2021. If the policy application form refers to the use of consumer credit
information, an amended form filing must also be submitted by May 6, 2021. The amendments
should be limited to the changes required by this rule.

(8) This rule takes effect immediately. To the extent this rule is adopted as a permanent rule it
shall remain in effect for three years following the day the national emergency concerning the
novel coronavirus disease (COVID–19) outbreak declared by the President on March 13, 2020
under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) terminates, or the day the
Governor’s Proclamation 20-05, proclaiming a State of Emergency throughout the state of
Washington as a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in the United
States expires, whichever is later.


File and source

File
2021-09-21_a29208_d236163_oic-emergency-rule-materials.pdf
Size
303,629 bytes
SHA-256
df863e38b0735ea5b701de0fc5e4dfba93353c895eac2df653cbbe1c83a917ac
Our copy
2021-09-21_a29208_d236163_oic-emergency-rule-materials.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top