Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Supplemental Declaration — Jonathan Craig — Temporary Mask Mandate — The Arc of Iowa v. Kim Reynolds (Case No. 4:21-cv-264)

Supplemental Declaration — Jonathan Craig — Temporary Mask Mandate — The Arc of Iowa v. Kim Reynolds (Case No. 4:21-cv-264)

Summary

A supplemental declaration made under 28 U.S.C. § 1746 in The Arc of Iowa et al. v. Kim Reynolds et al., Case No. 4:21-cv-264, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, dated September 2021. The declarant states that the Waterloo School District the declarant's children attend passed a temporary mask mandate on September 17, 2021 for pre-K through fifth grade students, since the judge issued the temporary restraining order banning enforcement of HF 847. The declaration states that the mandate was effective on September 20, 2021 and ends on September 24, 2021. It says the district needs a mask mandate lasting longer than one week so the family can plan a stable education experience for the semester, and refers to the request for a preliminary injunction.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Supplemental Declaration — Jonathan Craig — Temporary Mask Mandate — The Arc of Iowa v. Kim Reynolds (Case No. 4:21-cv-264).” Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2021-09-17-plaintiffs-v-kim-reynolds-et-al-f0caca31-1/, SHA-256 f0caca311d316aabf446fa6c505f4f6d6a022f79613a1ca0ab8ec658cb6bd69b.

Full text

                                  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                              FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA


THE ARC OF IOWA et al.,

                Plaintiffs,                                  Case No. 4:21-cv-264
        v.

KIM REYNOLDS et al.,                                         SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF
                                                             JONATHAN CRAIG
                 Defendants.




       COMES NOW, Jonathan Craig and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, declares under penalty

of perjury that the following is true and correct:

    1. My name is Jonathan Craig, and I am over 18 years old. I have personal knowledge of

        the facts as stated herein.

    2. Since the judge issued the temporary restraining order banning enforcement of HF 847,

        the Waterloo School District my children, E.C. and J.C., attend school passed a temporary

        mask mandate on September 17, 2021. The mandate applies to pre-K through fifth grade

        students and was effective on September 20, 2021. The mandate is only in effect for one

        week and ends on September 24, 2021. During the week of September 20th, the school

        district will work on establishing a metric system that would be released on September

        24th at the end of the day that would detail the next steps at the elementary building level.

    3. I am relieved and am grateful that because of the judge's temporary restraining order the

        school district has passed a mask mandate, which is one of the necessary

        accommodations that my children need to safely attend school.



                                                     1
                                                                                        still
  4. My children are enrolled in 100% online learning through the school district. E.C.

      has still not been able to do any schoolwork online due to her significant disabilities and

      inability to use a computer. J.C. continues to do schoolwork online. However, J.C. is

      falling behind grade level in math, and my wife and I are considering hiring a tutor to

      assist him.

                                                                                           one
   5. The school district needs to put in place a mask mandate that would last longer than

       week so that our family can plan a stable education experience for our children for this

       semester. With the mask mandate ban law blocked and should the request for a

       preliminary injunction be granted, there is and will continue to be a path moving forward

       for us to pursue a longer mask mandate with the school district. Once a longer mask

       mandate is in place, I would feel comfortable sending my children back to school in

       person.
                                                                                             is true
   I swear under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing

and correct to the best of my knowledge.

       Dates this J.C, day of September 2021, at Waterloo, Iowa.




                                               2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.iasd.77124.48.9.pdf
Size
426,560 bytes
SHA-256
f0caca311d316aabf446fa6c505f4f6d6a022f79613a1ca0ab8ec658cb6bd69b
Our copy
gov.uscourts.iasd.77124.48.9.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top