Deposition Transcript Pages — Blue Flame Medical LLC v. Chain Bridge Bank, N.A. (E.D. Va.)
- Date
- 2021-05-27
Summary
Document 160-4, filed May 27, 2021 in Blue Flame Medical LLC v. Chain Bridge Bank, N.A., John J. Brough and David M. Evinger, with Chain Bridge Bank, N.A. as third-party plaintiff against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. It is a three-page exhibit containing the cover page and one transcript page of the remote videotaped deposition of a witness, marked Highly Confidential Pursuant to Protective Order. On that page, the witness is questioned about an email response stating that the Department of General Services was looking for another vendor. Asked whether, to the witness's knowledge, JP Morgan or anybody else ever confirmed fraud in connection with this transaction, the witness answers no. The page ends as the questioning turns to a March 27 email.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Deposition Transcript Pages — Blue Flame Medical LLC v. Chain Bridge Bank, N.A. (E.D. Va.).”
Original at ecf.vaed.uscourts.gov, dated 2021-05-27. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2021-05-27-highly-confidential-pursuant-to-protective-order/
, SHA-256 013000594525084050db77085c9a54851a9e464c7744787e9f82668673df7153.Full text
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD Document 160-4 Filed 05/27/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID#
4212
EXHIBIT I22
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD Document 160-4 Filed 05/27/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID#
4213
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
Page 1
1 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
2 PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
4
i:l::::::t: :::t:::: I ------x
5 BLUE FLAME MEDICAL LLC,
Plaintiff,
6
-agains t- Civil Action
7 No.
CHAIN BRIDGE BANK, N.A. , JOHN J. Lz20-cv-00658
8 BROUGH , and DAVID M. EVINGER,
Defendants.
9 ------x
CHAIN BRIDGE BANK, N . A. ,
10 Third-Party Plaintiff ,
11 -agains t-
L2 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N . A. ,
Third-Party Defendant.
13 ------x
L4 Feb ruary 9, 2O2L
9:35 a.m
15
16
77 Remote Videotaped Deposition of
18 RAKESH KORPAL, a 30 (b) ( 6) Witness, hel-d in
19 the above-entitled action, l-ocated in Tampa,
20 Florida, taken before Dawn Matera, a
2L Shorthand Reporter and Notary Public.
22
Veritext Legal Solutions
2t2-267-6868 www.veritext.com st6-608-2400
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD Document 160-4 Filed 05/27/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID#
4214
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
Page 183
1 A. Yes.
2 a. Okay. And the response back
3 from Mr. NeviIle includes a statement,
4 " They did not conclude fraud but onJ-y
5 that the Department of Genera]- Services
6 is l-ooking for another vendor. rl
7 Do you see that?
I A. Yes. Itrs the, I guess in the
9 middJ-e of it, yeah.
10 A. To your knowledge, has JP
11 Morgan or anybody eI se ever confirmed
1,2 fraud in connection with this
13 transaction?
L4 A. No.
15 a Now Iooking at the e-mai1 on
L6 the first page from Alexander Leonard to
L7 Art Nevi l- l- e and A]-ex Grant, copying quite
18 a number of people, including yourseJ-f ,
19 on March 27 in the afternoon.
20 And Mr. Leonard writes: "Whi1e
2t it vras not conf irmed as f raud, based on
22 my conversations with the Deputy State
Veritext Legal Solutions
2t2-267-6868 www.veritext.com s16-608-2400
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.vaed.477405.160.4.pdf
- Size
- 1,009,808 bytes
- SHA-256
- 013000594525084050db77085c9a54851a9e464c7744787e9f82668673df7153
- Original
- PACER (login required)