Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order: The Court Denies the Doctors' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order — Frontline Doctors v. Becerra

Order: The Court Denies the Doctors' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order — Frontline Doctors v. Becerra

Summary

In Case 2:21-cv-00702-CLM in the Northern District of Alabama, America's Frontline Doctors and other plaintiffs sued Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and others. The order says the Plaintiff Doctors moved for a temporary restraining order (doc. 1). It states that the court reviewed the motion and found no specific facts in the motion or attached affidavits that clearly show that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result before the Government Defendants can be heard in opposition. The court denies the motion. The order is dated May 24, 2021, and the signature block names Corey L. Maze, United States District Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Date
2021-05-24

Cite this document

“Order: The Court Denies the Doctors' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order — Frontline Doctors v. Becerra.” Original at archive.org, dated 2021-05-24. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2021-05-24-covid-era-misc/, SHA-256 cd5e255ca4cfa4ab146dd97f3243eb9190543b3f5801f4d8e7a0138684619b71.

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION

AMERICA’S FRONTLINE
)
DOCTORS, etc., et al.,

)

Plaintiffs,

)

)
v.

)

2:21-cv-00702-CLM

)
XAVIER BECERRA,

)
Secretary of the U.S. Department
)
of Health and Human Services,
)
et al.,

)

Defendants.

)

ORDER
The Plaintiff Doctors and others have moved for a temporary restraining order
(doc. 1). The court has reviewed the Doctors’ motion and finds no specific facts in
the motion or attached affidavits that “clearly show that immediate and irreparable
injury, loss, or damage will result to the [Doctors] before [the Government
Defendants] can be heard in opposition.” See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(1)(A). So the
court DENIES the Doctors’ motion for temporary restraining order (doc. 1).
DONE and ORDERED this May 24, 2021.

      _________________________________
      COREY L. MAZE
      UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
FILED
 2021 May-24  PM 12:05
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
Case 2:21-cv-00702-CLM   Document 3   Filed 05/24/21   Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.alnd.177186.3.0.pdf
Size
33,560 bytes
SHA-256
cd5e255ca4cfa4ab146dd97f3243eb9190543b3f5801f4d8e7a0138684619b71
Our copy
gov.uscourts.alnd.177186.3.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top