Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Exhibit 106, Deposition Transcript Pages — Blue Flame Medical LLC v. Chain Bridge Bank, N.A. (E.D. Va.)

Exhibit 106, Deposition Transcript Pages — Blue Flame Medical LLC v. Chain Bridge Bank, N.A. (E.D. Va.)

Date
2021-05-20

Summary

Exhibit 106, filed May 20, 2021 as Document 150-22 in Blue Flame Medical LLC v. Chain Bridge Bank, N.A., et al., Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, where Chain Bridge Bank is also third-party plaintiff against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The four-page exhibit reproduces the cover page and two transcript pages from a remote videotaped deposition, marked highly confidential pursuant to protective order. In the testimony, the witness describes a JPMorgan representative's account that the State of California had requested that funds be recalled. The witness paraphrases that the Treasurer's Office was not comfortable with the due diligence completed by the General Services Office, and places that conversation at approximately 2 p.m. Eastern.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Exhibit 106, Deposition Transcript Pages — Blue Flame Medical LLC v. Chain Bridge Bank, N.A. (E.D. Va.).” Original at ecf.vaed.uscourts.gov, dated 2021-05-20. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2021-05-20-highly-confidential-pursuant-to-protective-order/, SHA-256 2fa9057a8c826f73da51df38940df328ce7f8d56eadc5dac8df2d0da31b0d1c9.

Full text

Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD   Document 150-22   Filed 05/20/21   Page 1 of 4 PageID#
                                     3837




      EXHIBIT 106
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD   Document 150-22        Filed 05/20/21     Page 2 of 4 PageID#
                                     3838

                  HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER

                                                                           Page 1

   1                    HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
   2              PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
   3          IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
              FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
   4
              i:l:::::::: :::::::: l                   ------x
   5          BLUE FLAME MEDICAL LLC,
                                  Pl-aintif                f ,
   6

                              - agai-n s t-                      CiviL Action
   7                                                             No.
              CHAIN BRIDGE BANK, N . A. , JOHN J                 t:20-cv-00658
   I          BROUGH , and DAVID M. EVINGER,
                                   Defendants.
    9

              CHAIN BRIDGE BANK, N.A. ,
  10                  Third-Party Plaintiff ,
  11                        - agains t-
  t2          JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N. A. ,
                      Third-Party Defendant.
  13
  L4                                      February 9 , 202L
                                          9: 35 a. m.
  15
  L6
  L1                  Remote Videotaped Deposition of
  18          RAKESH KORPAL, a 30 (b) ( 6) Witness, held in
  19          the above-entitled  action, located in Tampa,
  20          FIorida, taken before Dawn Matera, a
  2L          Shorthand Reporter and Notary Publ-ic.
  22

                                 Veritext Le gal S o lutions
        2t2-267-6868               www.veritext.com                           sr6-608-2400
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD       Document 150-22         Filed 05/20/21       Page 3 of 4 PageID#
                                         3839

                  HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER

                                                                                   Page 2t

    1         completed         their       due diJ.igence              to    validate
    2         the transaction.
    3              A.     Was that something that
    4         Mr. Neville   learned on that call that                                  you
    5         referenced previousJ-y at noon Eastern                                    on
    6         March 26Ele, 2O2O?
    7                  A.       Yes.
    I             A.    Did you learn any other facts
    9         from Mr. Nevil-l-e relevant to the topics
  10          in Exhibit         80?
  11                   A        Later       t'hat     day on a subsequent
  L2          conversation,             State       of California               had
  13          requested         the funds be reca]-led.
  L4               A.      tlhat did Mr. Neville
  15          specificaJ-J-y te11 you about that
  t6          conversation?
  t7                   A.       I would have to say,                        I am going
  18          to paraphrase,             because I don't                    recall-     the
  L9          exact         languag€,      but something                to the
  20          effect         of the Treasurer's                    Office     was not
  2L          comfortable         with        the diligence,                 due
  22          diligence         that      the GeneraJ- Services



                                        Veritext Legal Solutions
        212-267-6868                      www.veritext.com                            5 16-608-2400
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD        Document 150-22         Filed 05/20/21        Page 4 of 4 PageID#
                                          3840

                   HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER

                                                                                   Page 22

   1          Office         compJ.eted.
   2                             Can you give me a second
   3          because I am hearing noise from
   4          downstairs and I just want to cl-ose the
   5          door?
    6                  A.        Sure.
   7                   A.        Sorry,        that     was my father
   8          downstairs,          it     was distracting                  me.
    9             A.      No problem.                     Are you
  10          comfortable   proceeding                    at this          point?
  11                   A.        Yes.
  L2                   A.        Okay.         Do you know what time
  13          that         subsequent       conversation              was that
  L4          Mr. Neville          had with            the State           of
  15          California?
  16                   A  I would say it was
  L7          approximately   2 p.m. Eastern.
  18                   a.       was Mr.         Neville            the onJ-y
  19          representative              of    .IPMorgan on that                  cal- 1
  20          with         the California             State        Treasurerrs
  2t          Office?
  22                   A         I don't        know.         I was not part



                                        Veritext Legal Solutions
        212-267-6868                      www.veritext.com                             sI6-608-2400


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.vaed.477405.150.22.pdf
Size
1,402,654 bytes
SHA-256
2fa9057a8c826f73da51df38940df328ce7f8d56eadc5dac8df2d0da31b0d1c9
Our copy
gov.uscourts.vaed.477405.150.22.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top