Defendant The Poynter: Opposition to Plaintiff Children Health Defense's (1) Request for Judicial Notice (Dkt. No. 97) (Document 100)
- Date
- 2021-05-12
Summary
An opposition filed May 12, 2021 as Document 100 by defendant The Poynter Institute for Media Studies, Inc. in Children's Health Defense v. Facebook, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:20-cv-05787-SI, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, before Hon. Susan Illston. Poynter opposes the plaintiff's Request for Judicial Notice (Dkt. No. 97) and Request for Leave to File Statement of Recent Decision (Dkt. No. 98), both filed May 11, 2021. It adopts and incorporates the arguments in Facebook Inc.'s and Mark Zuckerberg's opposition to the same requests (Dkt. No. 99) and asks the court to deny what it calls procedurally improper attempts to supplement the record. The filing is signed by Jassy Vick Carolan LLP and Thomas & LoCicero PL and ends with a signature attestation and certificate of service.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Defendant The Poynter: Opposition to Plaintiff Children Health Defense's (1) Request for Judicial Notice (Dkt. No. 97) (Document 100).”
Original at archive.org, dated 2021-05-12. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2021-05-12-plaintiff-v-facebook-inc-a-delaware-corporation/
, SHA-256 dd3facf19780ea842c2531311b3488496222bb5bcd98f90453d841220d6f6194.Full text
Case 3:20-cv-05787-SI Document 100 Filed 05/12/21 Page 1 of 3
1 JASSY VICK CAROLAN LLP THOMAS & LOCICERO PL
KEVIN L. VICK (SBN 220738) CAROL JEAN LOCICERO (pro hac vice)
2 kvick@jassyvick.com clocicero@tlolawfirm.com
800 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 800 MARK R. CARAMANICA (pro hac vice)
3 Los Angeles, CA 90017 mcaramanica@tlolawfirm.com
Telephone: (310) 870-7048 601 South Boulevard
4 Facsimile: (310) 870-7010 Tampa, FL 33606
Telephone: (813) 984-3060
5 Attorneys for Defendant The Poynter Facsimile: (813) 984-3070
Institute for Media Studies, Inc.
6 -and-
7 DANIELA B. ABRATT (pro hac vice)
dabratt@tlolawfirm.com
8 915 Middle River Drive, Suite 309
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33304
9 Telephone: (954) 703-3416
Facsimile: (954) 400-5415
10
Attorneys for Defendant The Poynter
11 Institute for Media Studies, Inc.
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16 CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE, a Georgia non-
profit organization, Case No.: 3:20-cv-05787-SI
17
Plaintiff, DEFENDANT THE POYNTER
18 INSTITUTE FOR MEDIA STUDIES,
v. INC.’S OPPOSITION TO
19 PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR
FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation; MARK JUDICIAL NOTICE (DKT. NO. 97)
20 ZUCKERBERG, a California resident; SCIENCE AND REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO
FEEDBACK, a French corporation; THE POYNTER FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT
21 INSTITUTE FOR MEDIA STUDIES, INC., a DECISION (DKT. NO. 98)
Florida corporation; and DOES 1-20.
22 Hon. Susan Illston
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28 CASE NO.: 3:20-CV-05787-SI THE POYNTER INSTITUTE FOR MEDIA
STUDIES, INC.’S OPPOSITION TO
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL
NOTICE AND LEAVE TO FILE STATEMENT
OF RECENT DECISION
Case 3:20-cv-05787-SI Document 100 Filed 05/12/21 Page 2 of 3
1 Defendant, the Poynter Institute for Media Studies, Inc. (“Poynter”), hereby files its
2 opposition to Plaintiff Children Health Defense’s (1) Request for Judicial Notice in Support of
3 Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motions to Dismiss and in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion to Supplement the
4 Pleadings (Dkt. No. 97) and (2) Plaintiff’s Request for Leave to File Statement of Recent Decision
5 (Dkt. No. 98), both filed on May 11, 2021. Poynter adopts and incorporates by reference as if fully
6 set forth herein the arguments made in Defendants Facebook Inc.’s and Mark Zuckerberg’s
7 Opposition to the same (Dkt. No. 99). For the reasons stated therein, Poynter respectfully requests
8 that this Court deny Plaintiff’s procedurally improper and bad faith attempts to supplement the
9 record and present belated and irrelevant legal argument.
10 Dated: May 12, 2021 JASSY VICK CAROLAN LLP
By: /s/ Kevin L. Vick
11 KEVIN L. VICK
12
THOMAS & LOCICERO PL
13 By: /s/ Carol Jean LoCicero
CAROL JEAN LOCICERO
14
Attorneys for Defendant, The Poynter Institute
15 for Media Studies, Inc.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 CASE NO.: 3:20-CV-05787-SI THE POYNTER INSTITUTE FOR MEDIA
STUDIES, INC.’S OPPOSITION TO
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL
NOTICE AND LEAVE TO FILE STATEMENT
OF RECENT DECISION
Case 3:20-cv-05787-SI Document 100 Filed 05/12/21 Page 3 of 3
1 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
2 I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing.
3 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), I hereby attest that the other signatures have concurred in this
4
filing.
5
Dated: May 12, 2021 By: /s/ Elizabeth Baldridge
6 Elizabeth Baldridge
7
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
8
I hereby certify that on May 12, 2021, I electronically filed the above document with the
9
10 Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF which will send electronic notification of such filing to all
11 registered counsel.
12 Dated: May 12, 2021 By: /s/ Elizabeth Baldridge
Elizabeth Baldridge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 CASE NO.: 3:20-CV-05787-SI THE POYNTER INSTITUTE FOR MEDIA
STUDIES, INC.’S OPPOSITION TO
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL
NOTICE AND LEAVE TO FILE STATEMENT
OF RECENT DECISION
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.364478.100.0.pdf
- Size
- 120,546 bytes
- SHA-256
- dd3facf19780ea842c2531311b3488496222bb5bcd98f90453d841220d6f6194
- Original
- archive.org