Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Ninth Order of Consolidation and Administrative Close-Out

Ninth Order of Consolidation and Administrative Close-Out

Date
2021-04-26

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.  21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres

In re:

JANUARY 2021 SHORT SQUEEZE
TRADING LITIGATION
_________________________________/

This Document Relates to:

21-21534-CIV-ALTONAGA

NINTH ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSE-OUT
THIS CAUSE is before the Court sua sponte.  The above-styled case is consolidated in
MDL proceeding 21-2989-MDL for all pretrial purposes, and the parties are directed to submit all
filings in the MDL action.  Given the consolidation of all cases in the MDL action, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Clerk of the Court shall mark the following case
as CLOSED for administrative purposes only:

21-21534-CIV-ALTONAGA

All pending motions in the above-listed case are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 26th day of April, 2021.

     _________________________________

     CECILIA M. ALTONAGA

     UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc:
counsel of record; pro se parties
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA   Document 232   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/26/2021   Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flsd.590042.232.0.pdf
Size
42,723 bytes
SHA-256
adf742750e498108ed04adf255a276e57097e04b5ae1bb67b324bda668874b5d
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flsd.590042.232.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
  1. Motion - D’Agostino et al. v. Ally Financial Inc. et al., No. 1 (2021-04-26)same docket · 2021-04-26
  2. Declaration of Frank R. Schirripa in Support of Applicationsame docket · 2021-04-26
  3. Declaration Of Sarah N. Westcot In Opposition To The Motion Ofsame docket · 2021-04-26
  4. (First Amended Complaint for Josh Gossett, et al. v. Robinhood Financial, et al. [2:21same docket · 2021-04-26
  5. CMA, hereby respectfully submit s this application pursuant to MDL Pretrial Order No. 2 ( Dktsame docket · 2021-04-26
  6. Hach Rose Schumacher Schirripa & Cheverie LLPsame docket · 2021-04-26
  7. Jslf Has The Resources To Adequa Tely Represent The Proposed Class 9 v. Additionsame docket · 2021-04-26
  8. monopolization; illegal reverse payments; “pay-for-delay” agreementssame docket · 2021-04-26
  9. Response in Opposition to Plaintiff Cody Todd’s Motion to Appointsame docket · 2021-04-26
  10. Supreme Court and various appellate courts dozens of significant decisions. All appellate matters aresame docket · 2021-04-26
  11. Complaint - Newman v. Eagle Bldg. Techs., 209 F.R.D. 499, 502 (S.D. Fla. (2021-04-26)same docket · 2021-04-26
  12. actions and securities class actions. The firm has litigated a number of cases resulting in reportedsame docket · 2021-04-26
  13. Pursuant to the Order (D.E. 209), attached for the Court’s consideration is the curriculumsame docket · 2021-04-26
  14. alleging defectively designed vehicles diesel engines. Settlement announcedsame docket · 2021-04-26
  15. Declaration of Dennis S. Ellis in Support of Application of Dennissame docket · 2021-04-26
  16. Complaint - See, e.g., Greater Chautauqua Federal Credit Union v. KMart Corp. et (2021-04-26)same docket · 2021-04-26
  17. Arbitration - System v. Rupert (2021-04-26)same docket · 2021-04-26
  18. motions and complex issues on behalf of GRYC and other firmssame docket · 2021-04-26
  19. Pursuant to this Court’s order dated April 19, 2021, I submit this statement to recommendsame docket · 2021-04-26
  20. decisions below without argument. In the 2000 Presidential election litigation, he was counsel insame docket · 2021-04-26

Part of: In re: January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation · Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) · Orders and opinions · Federal court dockets (PACER) · 2021 · Source documents

Back to top