Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Application of Natalia Salas of The Ferraro Law Firm, P.A. for Lead Counsel (Dkt. 243-7)

Application of Natalia Salas of The Ferraro Law Firm, P.A. for Lead Counsel — In re January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation (Dkt. 243-7, S.D. Fla.)

Summary

A letter application dated April 26, 2021 from Natalia M. Salas of The Ferraro Law Firm, P.A. to the Honorable Cecilia M. Altonaga for appointment as Lead Counsel in In re: January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation, MDL No. 2989, entered April 26, 2021 as Document 243-7 (5 pages) in Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA. Salas seeks Lead Counsel with specific responsibility over the common law tranche, states that Professor Bruce S. Rogow has agreed to serve as Special Counsel for that tranche, and reports that 31 firms support the application, with Exhibit A naming over 30 supporting law firms and Exhibits B and C each holding a CV. The letter addresses the four lead-counsel criteria of the Manual for Complex Litigation (Fourth) § 10.224 and describes the firm as having tried close to 100 cases and as the only legal team to argue before the JPML for transfer to this District.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Date
2021-04-26

Cite this document

“Application of Natalia Salas of The Ferraro Law Firm, P.A. for Lead Counsel (Dkt. 243-7).” Original at archive.org, dated 2021-04-26. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2021-04-26-covid-era-misc-ec3a8b9a-1/, SHA-256 ec3a8b9adc5285bc36d3952ac561fe2f44a59a55b205b9a4709ffad696afd455.

Full text

Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 243-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/26/2021 Page 1 of 5



                                                     brickell world plaza                  phone        305.375.0111
                                                     600 brickell avenue, suite 3800       toll-free    800.275.3332
                                                     miami, florida 33131                  fax          305.379.6222

                                                                                              Natalia m. salas, Esq.
                                                                                                            partner
                                                                                             nms@ferrarolaw.com


                                                 April 26, 2021

Via Electronic Filing
The Honorable Cecilia M. Altonaga
United States District Court Judge
400 N. Miami Avenue, Room 12-2
Miami, Florida 33128-1812

        Re:     In re January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation, MDL No. 2989 Application of
                Natalia Salas of The Ferraro Law Firm, P.A. for Lead Counsel

Dear Judge Altonaga:

        The Ferraro Law Firm, P.A. (“Ferraro Law”) has tried close to 100 cases to verdict or judgment,
successfully handled close to 50 appeals, and recovered billions of dollars for our clients. In this case, we
filed one of the first complaints nationally against the Robinhood Defendants and their alleged co-
conspirators, in this Honorable Court, and were the only legal team to appear before the Joint Panel on
Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) to argue for transfer to this District. The majority of parties appearing
before the JPML argued for transfer to California. Now that the cases have been transferred to the Southern
District of Florida, where Ferraro Law is headquartered, the overwhelming majority of firms in these
consolidated actions support my application to serve as Lead Counsel with specific responsibility over the
common law tranche of this of this Multi-District Litigation (“MDL”).1 Additionally, I am pleased to share
that Professor Bruce S. Rogow has agreed to serve as Special Counsel for the common law tranche,2 lending
support for my application through his 55 years of litigation experience, including MDL leadership and class
action expertise.

         The main criteria for appointment of lead counsel are: (1) ability to work cooperatively with others;
(2) willingness and ability to commit to a time-consuming process; (3) professional experience in this type
of litigation; and (4) access to sufficient resources to advance the litigation in a timely manner. See In Re:


1
  The names of over 30 law firms supporting my application for Lead Counsel, as well as a CV for myself and my
firm, are attached as Exhibits A and B, filed contemporaneously herewith.
2
 As the designated MDL law clerk In re Checking Account Overdraft Litigation, I interfaced directly with Professor
Rogow, who served as Lead Counsel to Plaintiffs. In 2011, Professor Rogow was named Most Effective Class Action
Lawyer for his work on the Bank Overdraft MDL. The organization of cases into tranches and timely resolution of
arbitration issues, motions to dismiss, and class certification led to class settlements of $410 million with Bank of
America, $110 million with J.P. Morgan Chase, and settlements with Citizens Bank, PNC, Compass Bank, Comerica,
U.S. Bank and others totaling $1.275 billion dollars through 2020. Professor Rogow’s CV is attached as Exhibit C.




                                  THE FERRARO LAW FIRM, P.A.
                                            www.ferrarolaw.com
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 243-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/26/2021 Page 2 of 5
                                                                            Page 2

Zantac (Ranitidine) Prods. Liab. Litig., Case No. 20-md-02924-RLR (Feb. 14, 2020 Pretrial Order #1, ECF
No. 13 at 11-12); THE MANUAL FOR COMPLEX LITIGATION (FOURTH) (“MCL 4TH”), § 10.224, p. 27. As set
forth below, we satisfy all four criteria.

    1. Ability to work cooperatively with others.

        As the Court noted in Pretrial Order #1, “[t]he way the attorneys comport themselves by remaining
professional and courteous always is imperative . . . .” [ECF No. 46.] Our ability to work cooperatively
with others is established by this application’s endorsements from nearly all Plaintiffs’ counsel who have
affirmatively lent support to a leadership structure, with 31 firms supporting our application. We are
particularly humbled by the support we received from all Florida-based law firms that, to our knowledge,
have chosen to affirmatively endorse our leadership application, including Gray Robinson, P.A., the largest
staffed Plaintiffs’ firm in this entire MDL, with 300 lawyers, all in Florida, and 70 in the Southern District.
This support was earned over hours of 100+ lawyer calls, Zooms, and emails in the weeks since the JPML
granted our request to transfer the Short Squeeze Actions to this District. See MCL 4TH § 10.224, p. 27 (“It
is important [for the Court] to assess . . . the attorneys’ ability to command the respect of their colleagues . .
. .”). During these interactions, the attorneys for the Plaintiffs familiarized themselves with all attorneys
seeking leadership roles.

        At the outset of this MDL, Ferraro Law took the initiative as the first firm to arrange internal group
discussions among 136 attorneys, circulating a Joint Initial Agenda, and coordinating the selection of Liaison
Counsel. Ferraro Law also took the initiative to lead the first and only conference to date among all
Plaintiffs’ counsel and all Defendants’ counsel (totaling over 150 attorneys), in order to collaborate, reduce
waste, and timely comply with the Court’s orders. As a result of those efforts, I prepared and co-signed the
Joint Proposed Agenda, [ECF No. 145], and led the Initial Status Conference held before Your Honor on
April 19, 2021 [ECF No. 202].

         As a result of our efforts thus far in this litigation, Plaintiffs’ counsel in a majority of the cases in this
litigation have reached a consensus on a 3-person, Co-Lead structure, with each Lead specifically responsible
for his or her “tranche,” as distinguished by the nature of the claims, namely antitrust and the common law
claims, which may be further divided generally by the Robinhood Defendants and other Broker Dealer
Defendants for efficiency purposes. The majority of Plaintiffs’ counsel supports Ferraro Law and Dennis
Ellis of Browne George Ross O’Brien Annaguey & Ellis LLP serving as Co-Lead Counsel over the common
law claims in this MDL, Frank Schirripa as Lead of the antitrust tranche,3 and Rachel Furst of Grossman
Roth P.A. as Liaison Counsel, supported by a Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee (“PEC”) to be appointed by
Lead Counsel as appropriate to promote the orderly prosecution of this case.4



3
  To the extent that Joseph Saveri from The Joseph Saveri Law Firm, Inc. is also applying for the lead counsel role
presiding over the antitrust claims, Ferraro Law defers to this Honorable Court to appoint lead counsel to best serve
the interests of the class and is not opposed to Mr. Saveri’s candidacy.
4
  Ferraro Law takes no position regarding the “co-chair” concept mentioned during the April 19, 2021 Status
Conference as long as there is top-level diversity, by location, gender, race, and age, and any such co-chairs are not
used to provide cover for an all-male, generally non-diverse top-line leadership group with no representation from the
State of Florida. We are committed to appointing a PEC that is similarly diverse and representative of the class,
without, as we argued during the Status Conference, increasing leadership bureaucracy.
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 243-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/26/2021 Page 3 of 5
                                                                            Page 3

       I believe that the support that I have received is largely the result of the transparency and candor that
we have championed in discussions with Plaintiffs’ counsel over the last several weeks, and that we
emphasized during the April 19, 2021 Status Conference. For example, during that hearing, my co-counsel
and I argued against a majority-rules leadership selection process even though my application enjoys
overwhelming majority support. As a matter of principle and leadership style, if appointed Lead Counsel, I
will continue to promote the professionalism and openness within the leadership structure that has allowed
me to earn the trust of my peer attorneys in this case and the Plaintiffs whom they represent.

    2. Willingness and availability to commit to a time-consuming project.

         My firm and I have demonstrated our willingness and ability to commit the time necessary to
successfully prosecute this litigation. For example, Ferraro Law, together with its co-counsel, Sean Burstyn
and Jeffrey Kwatinetz, was the only legal team to argue that the Short Squeeze Actions should be transferred
to the Southern District of Florida and this Honorable Court in particular. Additionally, we took prompt
action by filing a complaint within 36 hours of the underlying misconduct. The other firms seeking
leadership appointments that argued before the JPML sought transfer to the Northern District of California
and shut out the close to one dozen Florida firms from communications regarding leadership, even after the
MDL was transferred to this Court. While each firm is entitled to pick its own strategy, Ferraro Law never
wavered from the appropriateness of prosecuting this national case in the Southern District of Florida. After
Mr. Dennis Ellis’ firm, Ferraro Law is the largest seeking a leadership role. I am personally fully available
to this important case and backed by dozens of capable attorneys and staff.

    3. Professional experience in this type of litigation.

         My firm and I are nationally recognized and have the experience and resources to advance this
litigation. Ferraro Law lawyers have litigated significant class action cases in the United States, and have
achieved landmark legal decisions and recoveries in the billions of dollars on behalf of millions of plaintiffs
nationwide. Ferraro Law attorneys have substantial experience serving as lead counsel and co-lead counsel
in class actions and complex litigation, as well as in MDLs, serving on several plaintiffs’ executive
committees, including a recent appointment in Aqueous Film-Forming Foams (AFFF) Products Liability
Litigation, MDL No. 2873. Additionally, Professor Rogow, as Special Counsel, brings his wealth of
experience to the table and will undoubtedly be an asset to the class and me if I am so privileged as to be
appointed Lead Counsel.

        My substantial professional experiences have amply prepared me for the Lead Counsel role in this
case. I have been on the inside of a sophisticated, consumer financial fraud class action MDL, such as this
one, involving over 80 actions against over 30 banks, before the Honorable James Lawrence King (MDL
No. 2036), overseeing class certification motions, arbitration and class action waiver issues, common law
claims under the laws of various states, and settlements totaling over $1 billion for Plaintiffs. My clerkship
experience also includes the trials of a securities class action and the largest healthcare fraud case at the time.
For close to fifteen years, I have litigated complex business litigation disputes, including in successful
defense of one of the largest class actions in the country, financial fraud and Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) enforcement actions, and breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, tortious
interference, and negligence cases such as this one. I also have significant trial and courtroom experience,
beginning my career with the benefit of first- and second-chair roles in jury and bench trials under the
mentorship of Kendall Coffey and Robert Burlington of Coffey Burlington, P.L. During my six-year tenure
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 243-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/26/2021 Page 4 of 5
                                                                            Page 4

as Senior Counsel for an AmLaw 50 law firm in Miami, Florida, I litigated high profile cases, including the
prosecution of a month-long jury trial on behalf of The Vizcayans, a $100 million summary judgment
through appeal, and representation of Kickstarter and other online platforms relating to their terms of use in
a matter involving issues similar to those in this case. Most recently, before joining Ferraro Law, I served
as Assistant General Counsel to the University of Miami in the areas of litigation, healthcare, privacy,
regulatory compliance, athletics, research, and technology transfer. I was recognized by Senior Vice
President and General Counsel, Aileen Ugalde, for my leadership through the Talent and Organizational
Development program.

   4. Willingness to commit the necessary resources to pursue this matter.

        Ferraro Law has the human and financial resources necessary to prosecute a case like this, which is
particularly important given the well-heeled Defendants and defense firms in this case, and we commit to
providing those resources to this litigation. Ferraro Law is no stranger to cases of this magnitude, as we
regularly invest millions of dollars in cases against the largest and wealthiest corporations and law firms in
the world. I also intend to lead a team of as many partners and associates as needed to effectively prosecute
this case in coordination with the additional firms that will make up the leadership structure of this case.
Finally, as a successful and well-managed firm, Ferraro Law never relies on outside funding for its cases,
and has no plans to do so here.

   5. American Bar Association (“ABA”) Resolution 113.

         Although not a traditional consideration, we are aware of and welcome the close attention recently
given to the makeup of leadership in MDLs of national importance. See Elizabeth C. Burch, Diversity in
MDL Leadership: A Field Guide, (University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, 2020),
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3767123 (last visited Apr. 24, 2021); In Re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Prods. Liab.
Litig., Case No. 20-md-02924-RLR (Feb. 14, 2020 Pretrial Order #1, ECF No. 13 at 11-12) (discussing the
court’s desire for diverse leadership). We also recognize the same concern was recently noted in another
ongoing matter against Robinhood, In re Robinhood Outage Litigation, Case No. 3:20-cv-02669-JD, where
the Court declined to appoint the individual lawyers identified to be lead counsel, despite their “impressive
history of successful engagements as class counsel in this District,” because of the “repeat player” problem:

               The Court is concerned about a lack of diversity in the proposed lead counsel.
               For example, all four of the proposed lead counsel are men, which is also true
               for the proposed seven lawyers for the “executive committee” and liaison
               counsel. In addition, the proposed counsel appear to be lawyers and law firms
               that have enjoyed a number of leadership appointments in other cases. While
               this experience is likely to benefit the putative class, it highlights the “repeat
               player” problem in class counsel appointments that has burdened class action
               litigation and MDL proceedings. Counsel with significant prior appointments
               are by no means disqualified from consideration here, but leadership roles
               should be made available to newer and less experienced lawyers, and the
               attorneys running this litigation should reflect the diversity of the proposed
               national class. Consequently, the Court denies the interim counsel request.

(See Order Regarding Consolidation and Interim Class Counsel [ECF 42], ⁋ 11.)
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 243-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/26/2021 Page 5 of 5
                                                                            Page 5


       Ferraro Law supports ABA Resolution 113, which urges our profession to become more inclusive
and create opportunities at all levels of responsibilities for diverse attorneys. As such, we are committed to
proposing to the Court a final slate that is demographically, geographically, and experientially diverse,
eminently competent, and representative of the class. Although courts have historically been constrained by
proposed MDL slates that fail to reflect the makeup of America, the slate proposed herein presents an
opportunity to turn the page on that past. I am a Cuban-American mother of two young and biracial children
from Florida and my proposed Co-Lead Counsel for the common law tranche is an African-American, male,
from California, who brings a unique class-action defense perspective to this case. Mr. Schirripa, whom we
support as Lead or Co-Lead of the antirust tranche, is from New York, has been involved in over 24 MDLs,
including a 6-week jury trial that achieved a $25 million settlement, and brings a youthful energy to the case.

        Moreover, Lead Counsel has entrusted and will continue to entrust substantial responsibilities to
young attorneys who can ably represent, and are representative of, the class. See CBS News, “Ahead of
IPO, Robinhood expands risky stock market lending,” at https://www.cbsnews.com/news/robinhood-ipo-
filing-margin-lending/ (last visited Apr. 24, 2021) (“Robinhood, launched in 2013, has become particularly
popular with young investors because it offers commission-free trading through an app geared to millennial
and Gen Z consumers . . . .”). For example, Ferraro Law’s co-counsel, Mr. Burstyn, a first-generation
American of Afro-Cuban descent, successfully argued for transfer to the Southern District of Florida as the
youngest attorney to appear before the JPML in this case, and he brings a professionally diverse perspective
given his background as a predominantly defense-side attorney during his years at Skadden, Arps, Slate,
Meagher & Flom LLP.

        This is not one of the typical cases where courts are constrained to choose from a prepackaged MDL
slate that is proposed by senior attorneys and supported by young and diverse back-office helpers. See, e.g.,
In re: Denture Cream Prods. Liab. Litig., No. 19-md-02051 (S.D. Fla. July 13, 2009) (Altonaga, J.) (ECF
No. 174, Hearing Tr. at 14:8–9) (“I do have a woman, just so that’s clear.”); see also id. at 14:20–21 (“We
have more women lawyers in our office than men.”). The proposed structure offers diversity, aptitude, and
experience, with qualified lawyers prepared to lead the class and ensure the best possible representation for
the class.

       I thank the Court in advance for considering my application to serve as Lead Counsel. It would be
an honor and a privilege to serve if I were chosen.


                                                      Sincerely,

                                                      /s/ Natalia M. Salas
                                                      Natalia M. Salas, Esq.



cc: All Counsel of Record


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flsd.590042.243.7.pdf
Size
300,551 bytes
SHA-256
ec3a8b9adc5285bc36d3952ac561fe2f44a59a55b205b9a4709ffad696afd455
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flsd.590042.243.7.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top