Complaint - CHD v. Facebook et al. (2021-04-22)
Summary
A declaration by Roger Teich, counsel for plaintiff Children’s Health Defense, filed 03/16/21 as Document 78-1 in Children’s Health Defense v. Facebook, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:20-cv-05787-SI, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. It supports the parties’ stipulation and proposed order re: the April 22, 2021 hearing date and case management conference. Teich recounts that CHD filed its Second Amended Complaint on December 15, 2020 and that Facebook, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg and The Poynter Institute for Media Studies, Inc. moved to dismiss it. He states that the Clerk of the Court then wrote to all counsel about the pending motions to dismiss, after which the parties agreed to file the stipulation. He signed it in San Francisco on March 15, 2021.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
- Date
- 2021-04-22
Cite this document
“Complaint - CHD v. Facebook et al. (2021-04-22).”
Original at archive.org, dated 2021-04-22. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2021-04-22-chd-v-facebook-et-al/
, SHA-256 e45dc043938ad8579958fd5da764fca5d7a9382cce8edfd18b6a8bb326a6fda7.Full text
1 Roger Teich Declaration ISO Stipulation and [Proposed] Order CHD v. Facebook et al.; Case No. 3:20-cv-05787-SI 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ROGER I. TEICH California State Bar No. 147076 290 Nevada Street San Francisco, CA 94110 Telephone: (415) 948-0045 E-Mail Address: rteich@juno.com ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR. MARY HOLLAND Children’s Health Defense 1227 North Peachtree Parkway, Suite 202 Peachtree City, GA 30269 Telephone: (917) 743-3868 E-Mail Address: mary.holland@childrenshealthdefense.org Attorneys for Plaintiff CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE, Plaintiff, v. FACEBOOK, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 3:20-cv-05787-SI ROGER TEICH DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: APRIL 22, 2021 HEARING DATE AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Civil L.R. 6-2 I, Roger Teich, declare as follows: 1. I am a member of the State Bar of California and the Bar of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and counsel for Plaintiff Children’s Health Defense (“CHD”) in this action. This declaration is made in support of the Parties’ Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re: April 22, 2021 Hearing Date and Case Management Conference. If called as a witness, I could and would testify competently to the facts herein, except as to those matters stated on information and belief. 2. On December 15, 2020, Plaintiff CHD filed its Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) by written consent under Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 15(a)(2) (Dkts. 65-1 and 67). On December 21, 2020, pursuant Case 3:20-cv-05787-SI Document 78-1 Filed 03/16/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 to the stipulated briefing schedul The Poynter Institute for Media S 68 and 69). On February 5, 2021 71). On March 3, 2021, the Cour March 23, 2021 (Dkt. 72). On M Dismiss (Dkts. 73 and 74). On M Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(d) and exhibit Motion to Shorten Time under C could be heard with Defendants’ Defendants Facebook, Inc. and Z (Dkt. 77). 3. On March 12, 202 the Clerk of the Court wrote all c Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. 68 and 22, 2021, in the interests of judic 4. Following an exch Parties agreed to file the Stipulat 5. Plaintiff agrees th I declare under penalty of and correct to the best of my kno California, on March 15, 2021. 2 Roge Stipulati CHD v. Facebook et al. le (Dkts. 63 and 67), Defendants Facebook, Inc., Studies, Inc. (“Poynter”) filed their Motions to D , Plaintiff filed its Oppositions to the Motions to rt moved the hearing on the Motions to Dismiss March 5, 2021, Defendants filed Replies in Suppo March 8, 2021, Plaintiff filed its Motion to Suppl ts thereto (docketed on ECF as “Motion to Amen Civil L.R. 6-3 (Dkts. 75 and 76), so that its Motio pending Motions to Dismiss on March 23, 2021 Zuckerberg filed their Opposition to CHD’s Mot 21, after exchanges with the Parties concerning t counsel to ask if the Parties would agree to stipu d 69) along with the Motion to Amend/Correct (D cial economy and to allow for additional oral arg hange of emails and “meet and confer” telephon tion and [Proposed] Order to modify the case cal hat its Motion to Shorten Time (Dkt. 77) is moot f perjury under the laws of the United States tha owledge and that this declaration was executed in ROGER I. TEICH Counsel for Plaintiff Children’s Health Defense er Teich Declaration ISO on and [Proposed] Order ; Case No. 3:20-cv-05787-SI , Mark Zuckerberg, and Dismiss the SAC (Dkts. o Dismiss (Dkts. 70 and from March 19, 2021 to ort of their Motions to lement the SAC under nd/Correct”), and its on to Amend/Correct 1. On March 11, 2021, tion to Shorten Time their substantive views, ulate to having the Dkt. 76) heard on April gument. ne conference, the lendar accordingly. . at the foregoing is true n San Francisco, Case 3:20-cv-05787-SI Document 78-1 Filed 03/16/21 Page 2 of 2
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.364478.78.1.pdf
- Size
- 70,035 bytes
- SHA-256
- e45dc043938ad8579958fd5da764fca5d7a9382cce8edfd18b6a8bb326a6fda7
- Original
- archive.org