Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Respond to Report and Recommendation (Siruk) (Dkt. 275)

Respond to Report and Recommendation (Siruk) (Dkt. 275, S.D. Fla.)

Summary

This filing (Document 275), entered on the FLSD docket 04/30/2021 in Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA, is a Respond to Report and Recommendation by Petro Siruk and Marina Siruk in Case No. 21-cv-0415 in the District of Minnesota, against Robinhood Financial LLC and other defendants. The plaintiffs object to the entire report and recommendation and move for trial by jury to determine facts, stating that Plaintiffs are legally entitled to relief and that Defendants breached certain terms of the legal contract. The response is dated April 11, 2021 and signed by Petro Siruk and Marina Siruk, All Rights Reserved.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Date
2021-04-15

Cite this document

“Respond to Report and Recommendation (Siruk) (Dkt. 275).” Original at archive.org, dated 2021-04-15. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2021-04-15-plaintiffs-v-robinhood-financial-llc-et-al/, SHA-256 45fb22da0ecba6273e9fa930d79b4964ba8e09563dbcb185823a39ec6cd2bc49.

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 275 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/30/2021 Page 1 of 1
CASE 0:21-cv-00415-PJS-DTS Doc.7 Filed 04/15/21 Page 1 oRECEIVED

RY MAIL
UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT APR 14 29;
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CLERK, U.S. vigy
oT PAUL Mee COURT

Petro Siruk and Marina Siruk Case No. 21-cv-0415 (PIS/DTS)

Plaintiffs, |
V.

RESPOND TO REPORT AND

Robinhood Financial LLC, et al. RECOMMENDATION

Defendants.

In response to the report and recommendation the Plaintiffs objects to the entire report and —
recommendation and moves for the the trial by jury to determine facts.

Plaintiffs are entitled to relief, and this court would make an error if ruled otherwise based on
the following facts:

(1)Plaintiffs legally entitled to a relief against said defendants;
(2)Defendants breached certain terms of the legal contract, therefore above-named defendants are
legally indepted to above-named plaintiffs.
Date: April 11, 2021 /s/ NA V.I. Petro Siruk, All Rights Reserved
/s/ NA V.L Marina Siruk, All Rights Reserved

SCANNED
APR 15 2021 ck

U.S. DISTRICT COURT ST. PAUL

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flsd.590042.275.0.pdf
Size
61,192 bytes
SHA-256
45fb22da0ecba6273e9fa930d79b4964ba8e09563dbcb185823a39ec6cd2bc49
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flsd.590042.275.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top