Fiscal Note Summary - 1173 S HB, State Lands Development Authorities (Final 2/14/2021)
Summary
A Multiple Agency Fiscal Note Summary for Bill Number 1173 S HB, titled State lands development auth, prepared by Tyler Lentz, OFM, with the entry Final 2/14/2021. The summary tables cover the 2021-23, 2023-25 and 2025-27 periods for cash receipts, operating expenditures and capital budget expenditures. The Office of State Treasurer cash receipts entry reads non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings, and the local government other line reads the same. The Individual State Agency Fiscal Note for the Office of the Governor checks No Fiscal Impact. A reference list near the end cites the Interbay Public Development Advisory Committee's Recommendations and Implementation Plan.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Fiscal Note Summary - 1173 S HB, State Lands Development Authorities (Final 2/14/2021).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2021-03-16-a28696-d231283-1173-fn-final-2-14-21-db592ae581/
, SHA-256 3ea6066311db19113e56e9611d45e45a0cffcbedaf0cc6f58db03ba1e10776f8.Full text
Multiple Agency Fiscal Note Summary
Bill Number: 1173 S HB Title: State lands development auth
Estimated Cash Receipts
Agency Name 2021-23 2023-25 2025-27
GF-State NGF-Outlook Total GF-State NGF-Outlook Total GF-State NGF-Outlook Total
Office of State Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion.
Treasurer
Total $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Estimated Operating Expenditures
Agency Name 2021-23 2023-25 2025-27
FTEs GF-State NGF-Outlook Total FTEs GF-State NGF-Outlook Total FTEs GF-State NGF-Outlook Total
Office of the .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0
Governor
Office of State .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0
Treasurer
Office of Financial .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0
Management
Total $ 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0
Agency Name 2021-23 2023-25 2025-27
FTEs GF-State Total FTEs GF-State Total FTEs GF-State Total
Local Gov. Courts
Loc School dist-SPI
Local Gov. Other Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion.
Local Gov. Total
Estimated Capital Budget Expenditures
Agency Name 2021-23 2023-25 2025-27
FTEs Bonds Total FTEs Bonds Total FTEs Bonds Total
Office of the Governor .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0
Office of State Treasurer .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0
Office of Financial .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0
Management
Total $ 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0
Agency Name 2021-23 2023-25 2025-27
FTEs GF-State Total FTEs GF-State Total FTEs GF-State Total
Local Gov. Courts
Loc School dist-SPI
Local Gov. Other Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion.
Local Gov. Total
FNPID: 62127
FNS029 Multi Agency rollup
Estimated Capital Budget Breakout
NONE
Prepared by: Tyler Lentz, OFM Phone: Date Published:
(360) 790-0055 Final 2/14/2021
FNPID: 62127
FNS029 Multi Agency rollup
Individual State Agency Fiscal Note
Bill Number: 1173 S HB Title: State lands development auth Agency: 075-Office of the
Governor
Part I: Estimates
X No Fiscal Impact
Estimated Cash Receipts to:
NONE
Estimated Operating Expenditures from:
NONE
Estimated Capital Budget Impact:
NONE
The cash receipts and expenditure estimates on this page represent the most likely fiscal impact. Factors impacting the precision of these estimates,
and alternate ranges (if appropriate), are explained in Part II.
Check applicable boxes and follow corresponding instructions:
If fiscal impact is greater than $50,000 per fiscal year in the current biennium or in subsequent biennia, complete entire fiscal note
form Parts I-V.
If fiscal impact is less than $50,000 per fiscal year in the current biennium or in subsequent biennia, complete this page only (Part I).
Capital budget impact, complete Part IV.
Requires new rule making, complete Part V.
Legislative Contact: Richelle Geiger Phone: 360-786-7139 Date: 02/03/2021
Agency Preparation: Jim Jenkins Phone: 360-902-0403 Date: 02/08/2021
Agency Approval: Jamie Langford Phone: (360) 870-7766 Date: 02/08/2021
OFM Review: Tyler Lentz Phone: (360) 790-0055 Date: 02/14/2021
Form FN (Rev 1/00) 164,566.00 Request # 041-1
FNS063 Individual State Agency Fiscal Note 1 Bill # 1173 S HB
Part II: Narrative Explanation
II. A - Brief Description Of What The Measure Does That Has Fiscal Impact
Briefly describe by section number, the significant provisions of the bill, and any related workload or policy assumptions, that have revenue or
expenditure impact on the responding agency.
• This bill authorizes the establishment of State Lands Development Authorities to oversee and manage the
development or redevelopment of state-owned property that is within or adjacent to manufacturing industrial
centers.
• The initial board of directors of a state lands development authority must be appointed by the governor upon
recommendation from the state legislative delegation from the district in which the boundaries of the state lands
development authority are contained.
• Authorizes the establishment of the Ballard-Interbay State Lands Development Authority on which a
representative of the Office of the Governor shall serve.
The work related to the requirements of this bill can done within current resources by reprioritizing workload.
II. B - Cash receipts Impact
Briefly describe and quantify the cash receipts impact of the legislation on the responding agency, identifying the cash receipts provisions by section
number and when appropriate the detail of the revenue sources. Briefly describe the factual basis of the assumptions and the method by which the
cash receipts impact is derived. Explain how workload assumptions translate into estimates. Distinguish between one time and ongoing functions.
II. C - Expenditures
Briefly describe the agency expenditures necessary to implement this legislation (or savings resulting from this legislation), identifying by section
number the provisions of the legislation that result in the expenditures (or savings). Briefly describe the factual basis of the assumptions and the
method by which the expenditure impact is derived. Explain how workload assumptions translate into cost estimates. Distinguish between one time
and ongoing functions.
Part III: Expenditure Detail
III. A - Operating Budget Expenditures
NONE
III. B - Expenditures by Object Or Purpose
NONE
III. C - Operating FTE Detail: List FTEs by classification and corresponding annual compensation. Totals need to agree with total FTEs in
Part I and Part IIIA
NONE
III. D - Expenditures By Program (optional)
NONE
Part IV: Capital Budget Impact
IV. A - Capital Budget Expenditures
NONE
IV. B - Expenditures by Object Or Purpose
NONE
State lands development auth 075-Office of the Governor
Form FN (Rev 1/00) 164,566.00 Request # 041-1
FNS063 Individual State Agency Fiscal Note 2 Bill # 1173 S HB
IV. C - Capital Budget Breakout
Identify acquisition and construction costs not reflected elsewhere on the fiscal note and describe potential financing methods
NONE
IV. D - Capital FTE Detail: List FTEs by classification and corresponding annual compensation. Totals need to agree with total FTEs in
Part IVB
NONE
Part V: New Rule Making Required
State lands development auth 075-Office of the Governor
Form FN (Rev 1/00) 164,566.00 Request # 041-1
FNS063 Individual State Agency Fiscal Note 3 Bill # 1173 S HB
Individual State Agency Fiscal Note
Bill Number: 1173 S HB Title: State lands development auth Agency: 090-Office of State
Treasurer
Part I: Estimates
No Fiscal Impact
Estimated Cash Receipts to:
Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion.
Estimated Operating Expenditures from:
NONE
Estimated Capital Budget Impact:
NONE
The cash receipts and expenditure estimates on this page represent the most likely fiscal impact. Factors impacting the precision of these estimates,
and alternate ranges (if appropriate), are explained in Part II.
Check applicable boxes and follow corresponding instructions:
If fiscal impact is greater than $50,000 per fiscal year in the current biennium or in subsequent biennia, complete entire fiscal note
form Parts I-V.
X If fiscal impact is less than $50,000 per fiscal year in the current biennium or in subsequent biennia, complete this page only (Part I).
Capital budget impact, complete Part IV.
Requires new rule making, complete Part V.
Legislative Contact: Richelle Geiger Phone: 360-786-7139 Date: 02/03/2021
Agency Preparation: Dan Mason Phone: (360) 902-8990 Date: 02/04/2021
Agency Approval: Dan Mason Phone: (360) 902-8990 Date: 02/04/2021
OFM Review: Ramona Nabors Phone: (360) 902-0547 Date: 02/06/2021
Form FN (Rev 1/00) 164,612.00 Request # 036-1
FNS063 Individual State Agency Fiscal Note 1 Bill # 1173 S HB
Part II: Narrative Explanation
II. A - Brief Description Of What The Measure Does That Has Fiscal Impact
Briefly describe by section number, the significant provisions of the bill, and any related workload or policy assumptions, that have revenue or
expenditure impact on the responding agency.
SHB 1173 creates the state lands development authority account, coupled with the general fund as the recipient
of the earnings from investments under RCW 43.84.092(4).
II. B - Cash receipts Impact
Briefly describe and quantify the cash receipts impact of the legislation on the responding agency, identifying the cash receipts provisions by section
number and when appropriate the detail of the revenue sources. Briefly describe the factual basis of the assumptions and the method by which the
cash receipts impact is derived. Explain how workload assumptions translate into estimates. Distinguish between one time and ongoing functions.
Projected cash flows are currently unavailable; therefore, estimated earnings from investments are
indeterminable.
There may be an impact on the debt service limitation calculation. Any change to the earnings credited to the
general fund will change, by an equal amount, general state revenues.
II. C - Expenditures
Briefly describe the agency expenditures necessary to implement this legislation (or savings resulting from this legislation), identifying by section
number the provisions of the legislation that result in the expenditures (or savings). Briefly describe the factual basis of the assumptions and the
method by which the expenditure impact is derived. Explain how workload assumptions translate into cost estimates. Distinguish between one time
and ongoing functions.
Part III: Expenditure Detail
III. A - Operating Budget Expenditures
NONE
III. B - Expenditures by Object Or Purpose
NONE
III. C - Operating FTE Detail: List FTEs by classification and corresponding annual compensation. Totals need to agree with total FTEs in
Part I and Part IIIA
NONE
III. D - Expenditures By Program (optional)
NONE
Part IV: Capital Budget Impact
IV. A - Capital Budget Expenditures
NONE
IV. B - Expenditures by Object Or Purpose
NONE
IV. C - Capital Budget Breakout
Identify acquisition and construction costs not reflected elsewhere on the fiscal note and describe potential financing methods
NONE
State lands development auth 090-Office of State Treasurer
Form FN (Rev 1/00) 164,612.00 Request # 036-1
FNS063 Individual State Agency Fiscal Note 2 Bill # 1173 S HB
IV. D - Capital FTE Detail: List FTEs by classification and corresponding annual compensation. Totals need to agree with total FTEs in
Part IVB
NONE
Part V: New Rule Making Required
State lands development auth 090-Office of State Treasurer
Form FN (Rev 1/00) 164,612.00 Request # 036-1
FNS063 Individual State Agency Fiscal Note 3 Bill # 1173 S HB
Individual State Agency Fiscal Note
Bill Number: 1173 S HB Title: State lands development auth Agency: 105-Office of Financial
Management
Part I: Estimates
X No Fiscal Impact
Estimated Cash Receipts to:
NONE
Estimated Operating Expenditures from:
NONE
Estimated Capital Budget Impact:
NONE
The cash receipts and expenditure estimates on this page represent the most likely fiscal impact. Factors impacting the precision of these estimates,
and alternate ranges (if appropriate), are explained in Part II.
Check applicable boxes and follow corresponding instructions:
If fiscal impact is greater than $50,000 per fiscal year in the current biennium or in subsequent biennia, complete entire fiscal note
form Parts I-V.
If fiscal impact is less than $50,000 per fiscal year in the current biennium or in subsequent biennia, complete this page only (Part I).
Capital budget impact, complete Part IV.
Requires new rule making, complete Part V.
Legislative Contact: Richelle Geiger Phone: 360-786-7139 Date: 02/03/2021
Agency Preparation: Jim Jenkins Phone: 360-902-0403 Date: 02/08/2021
Agency Approval: Jamie Langford Phone: 360-902-0422 Date: 02/08/2021
OFM Review: Tyler Lentz Phone: (360) 790-0055 Date: 02/12/2021
Form FN (Rev 1/00) 164,568.00 Request # 038-1
FNS063 Individual State Agency Fiscal Note 1 Bill # 1173 S HB
Part II: Narrative Explanation
II. A - Brief Description Of What The Measure Does That Has Fiscal Impact
Briefly describe by section number, the significant provisions of the bill, and any related workload or policy assumptions, that have revenue or
expenditure impact on the responding agency.
• This bill authorizes the establishment of State Lands Development Authorities to oversee and manage the
development or redevelopment of state-owned property that is within or adjacent to manufacturing industrial
centers.
• The initial board of directors of a state lands development authority must be appointed by the governor upon
recommendation from the state legislative delegation from the district in which the boundaries of the state lands
development authority are contained.
• Authorizes the establishment of the Ballard-Interbay State Lands Development Authority on which a
representative of the Office of the Governor shall serve.
The work related to the requirements of this bill can done within current resources by reprioritizing workload.
II. B - Cash receipts Impact
Briefly describe and quantify the cash receipts impact of the legislation on the responding agency, identifying the cash receipts provisions by section
number and when appropriate the detail of the revenue sources. Briefly describe the factual basis of the assumptions and the method by which the
cash receipts impact is derived. Explain how workload assumptions translate into estimates. Distinguish between one time and ongoing functions.
II. C - Expenditures
Briefly describe the agency expenditures necessary to implement this legislation (or savings resulting from this legislation), identifying by section
number the provisions of the legislation that result in the expenditures (or savings). Briefly describe the factual basis of the assumptions and the
method by which the expenditure impact is derived. Explain how workload assumptions translate into cost estimates. Distinguish between one time
and ongoing functions.
Part III: Expenditure Detail
III. A - Operating Budget Expenditures
NONE
III. B - Expenditures by Object Or Purpose
NONE
III. C - Operating FTE Detail: List FTEs by classification and corresponding annual compensation. Totals need to agree with total FTEs in
Part I and Part IIIA
NONE
III. D - Expenditures By Program (optional)
NONE
Part IV: Capital Budget Impact
IV. A - Capital Budget Expenditures
NONE
IV. B - Expenditures by Object Or Purpose
NONE
State lands development auth 105-Office of Financial Management
Form FN (Rev 1/00) 164,568.00 Request # 038-1
FNS063 Individual State Agency Fiscal Note 2 Bill # 1173 S HB
IV. C - Capital Budget Breakout
Identify acquisition and construction costs not reflected elsewhere on the fiscal note and describe potential financing methods
NONE
IV. D - Capital FTE Detail: List FTEs by classification and corresponding annual compensation. Totals need to agree with total FTEs in
Part IVB
NONE
Part V: New Rule Making Required
State lands development auth 105-Office of Financial Management
Form FN (Rev 1/00) 164,568.00 Request # 038-1
FNS063 Individual State Agency Fiscal Note 3 Bill # 1173 S HB
LOCAL GOVERNMENT FISCAL NOTE
Department of Commerce
Bill Number: 1173 S HB Title: State lands development auth
Part I: Jurisdiction-Location, type or status of political subdivision defines range of fiscal impacts.
Legislation Impacts:
X Cities: One member of the Seattle City Council and Seattle Mayor’s Office and their participation in board decision making ,
planning, and public outreach, within in Ballard-Interbay State Land Development Authority (BISLDA) Board of Directors.
X Counties: One member of the King County Council in the same capacity as above.
X Special Districts: One member of the Port of Seattle in the same capacity as above.
X Specific jurisdictions only: Only affects one member of Seattle City Council, King County Council, City of Seattle Mayor’s Office,
and the Port of Seattle for appointment to the BISLDA Board of Directors.
Variance occurs due to:
Part II: Estimates
No fiscal impacts.
X Expenditures represent one-time costs: Costs associated with initial selection of the BISLDA Board of Directors; costs to produce
strategic plans.
X Legislation provides local option: Establishes the process to form a State Lands Development Authority under certain conditions ,
as a local option.
X Key variables cannot be estimated with certainty at this time: Variance in municipal, county, and port official’s involvement in
BISLDA Board of Directors’ activities; development and
redevelopment scenario choice made by BISLDA Board of Directors;
public involvement and public outreach costs for strategic plan
development.
Estimated revenue impacts to:
None
Estimated expenditure impacts to:
Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion.
Part III: Preparation and Approval
Fiscal Note Analyst: Jordan Laramie Phone: 360-725-5044 Date: 02/08/2021
Leg. Committee Contact: Richelle Geiger Phone: 360-786-7139 Date: 02/03/2021
Agency Approval: Allan Johnson Phone: 360-725-5033 Date: 02/08/2021
OFM Review: Tyler Lentz Phone: (360) 790-0055 Date: 02/08/2021
Page 1 of 4 Bill Number: 1173 S HB
FNS060 Local Government Fiscal Note
Part IV: Analysis
A. SUMMARY OF BILL
Provide a clear, succinct description of the bill with an emphasis on how it impacts local government .
AMENDED PROVISIONS FROM PRIOR BILL:
Sec. 1: Establishes the purpose and formation of State Land Development Authorities (Authorities).
(2)(b) Legislative findings must be purposed and presented in writing to the relevant legislative committees in both the House of
Representatives and the Senate and include: (iii) that the property has a completed assessment regarding the current use , future use, and a
projected date or conditions when the land is vacant, excess, or surplus to the mission of the state agency that has custodial responsibility,
and (iv) the legislature intends that the Authority be appropriately funded and staffed .
Sec. 2: Establishes that Authorities are managed by a board of directors
(2) The initial board of directors must be appointed by the governor upon the recommendations of the state legislative delegations from the
district with the state-owned land that borders, or is within, a manufacturing industrial center.
Sec. 3: Establishes powers of the Authorities.
(3) Authorities do not have any authority to levy taxes or assessments.
Sec. 4: Establishes the duties of the Authorities.
(4)(b) Expands the land use options for the Ballard-Interbay State Lands Development Authority’s (BISLDA) strategic plan to include
residential development, as well as the incorporation of community-oriented facilities.
Sec. 6: Creates the Ballard-Interbay State Land Development Authority.
(1) (a) Details the Interbay property, the property’s deed limitations, and the process for the Department of Defense to release its use
restriction on the property following the National Guard’s relocation to a new facility. (b) The legislature intends that the Authority would
be appropriately funded and staffed.
(2) Clarifies that the legislature authorizes the creation of the BISLDA which boundaries are coextensive with the boundaries of the
Interbay property.
(4) Adds that the BISLDA does not have site control or access until after the National Guard relocation .
(5) Changes the composition of the initial BISLDA Board of Directors (Board) from 13-members to 11-members , with the following
amendments: (a) one-member with experience developing workforce or affordable housing; (b) one-member with knowledge of project
financing options for public-private partnerships related to housing, and (e) one-member representing the Governor’s Office.
(6) Amends the terms and term limits of the Board members.
(7) Establishes the formation of the Board in the initial period and all subsequent periods . The governor selects members of the board
through recommendation made by legislative delegates from the district in which the boundaries of the Authority are contained . For
subsequent Boards, the existing Board must develop a list of candidates for each position and deliver these recommendations to the
governor for appointment to the Board. In developing a list of candidates, the Board must consider racial, gender, and geographic diversity
so that the Board may reflect the diversity of the community.
Sec. 7: Sections 1 through 6 of this act constitute a new chapter in Title 43 RCW .
SUMMARY OF CURRENT BILL:
This legislation would establish the process to form State Land Development Authorities (Authorities) as well as the powers and duties of
these Authorities, in order to create the Ballard-Interbay State Lands Development Authority (BISLDA). These Authorities are authorized
to oversee and manage the development and redevelopment of state-owned property that is within , or adjacent to, manufacturing industrial
centers. Formation of a State Lands Development Authority is subject to legislative authorization by statute . The selection of an
Authority’s Board of Directors (Board) can only be formed by the governor upon recommendation from legislative delegation from a
district containing state-owned land which is adjacent to, or within, a manufacturing industrial center. Subsequent Board members would
be selected by the governor through a list of candidates chosen by existing Board members .
Page 2 of 4 Bill Number: 1173 S HB
FNS060 Local Government Fiscal Note
B. SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURE IMPACTS
Briefly describe and quantify the expenditure impacts of the legislation on local governments , identifying the expenditure provisions by
section number, and when appropriate, the detail of expenditures. Delineate between city, county and special district impacts.
CHANGE FROM PRIOR BILL:
BOARD WOULD BE APPROPRIATELY FUNDED BY THE LEGISLATURE:
Sec. 6(1)(b) establishes that the legislature intend for the Ballard-Interbay State Lands Development Authority (BISLDA) to be
appropriately funded and staffed.
STAFFING COSTS FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT MEMBERS OF THE BISLDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS :
The local government members of the BISLDA Board of Directors (Board), would be represented by one-member of the following: the
Port of Seattle, the King County Council, the City of Seattle Mayor’s Office, and the Seattle City Council. These members may have the
following costs to participate in board activities and create the strategic plan outlined in Sec . 4:
Sec. 3(1)(b) authorizes the special purpose government to employ their own staff for work related to the goals of the Authority . The
number of staff and the resources they may be able to provide to Board member is not yet known . However, Board members might choose
to have their existing personal staff support them logistically, which could have costs ranging from de minimis to more substantive. These
costs would depend on the scope of work involved with Board activities such creating the BISLDA’s strategic plan outlined in Sec . 4(4)
and drafting the BISLDA biennial report per Sec. 4(6). These would be additional costs to the local governments if the staff of the Board
member were used in this way.
A Board member might wish to task personal staff with analysis beyond what the Authority has supplied . In instances where work on this
kind of endeavor is substantive there could be costs for a couple of hours a month of Board member’s personal staff analysis and
preparations for Board activities. This would also include any parking, printing, or similarly related ancillary expenditures needed perform
the work to support the Board member.
MEETING ATTENDANCE COSTS:
The staff costs for the local government BISLDA Board members to attend meetings may be less than $10 ,000 per year, for members from
the Port of Seattle, the King County Council, the City of Seattle Mayor’s Office, and the Seattle City Council.
The King County staff that work on the board of directors for the Historic South Downtown Community Preservation & Development
Authority and the Central District Development & Preservation Authority in King County reported that they spend around 4-6 hours a
month on this type of work. The staff costs would translate to approximately $60.00/hour, or $240.00 - $360.00 a month per county board
member. Adding parking costs for monthly meetings for Board members could be $25 .00 a month, or $300.00 a year.
The staff hours and costs would be consistent with the meeting assumptions from the Washington State Military Department , who assume
in their fiscal note for HB 1173 (2021), that meetings related to the provisions of this legislation would be once per month and
approximately 3-hours in length.
If similar costs existed for all four local government Board member positions, the staff time for meetings could be:
(($60.00/hour x 3 hours) + $25.00 parking fees) = $205.00/meeting, per member
$205.00/meeting x 12 meetings = $2,460.00/year, per member
$2,460.00 x 4 local government Board members = $9,840 for 4 local government Board members to attend 1-years’ worth of BISLDA
Board meetings.
SUMMARY OF CURRENT BILL:
The proposed bill provides a local option to form State Lands Development Authorities (Authorities) and it does not require local
governments to create these Authorities. However, this legislation would create the Ballard-Interbay State Lands Development Authority
(BISLDA) and the formation of the BISLDA would have indeterminate expenditures as a result of this bill . Standing-up the BISLDA
would have costs related to managing and creating a strategic plan for the project until the National Guard moves to a new location , after
which, development or redevelopment plans could proceed. The cost for elected local government officials to attend the BISLDA
meetings is estimated to be less than $10,000 per year for the four appointed members. The legislature intends to appropriately fund and
staff the BISDLA for the goals established in this legislation.
Page 3 of 4 Bill Number: 1173 S HB
FNS060 Local Government Fiscal Note
C. SUMMARY OF REVENUE IMPACTS
Briefly describe and quantify the revenue impacts of the legislation on local governments , identifying the revenue provisions by section
number, and when appropriate, the detail of revenue sources. Delineate between city, county and special district impacts.
CHANGE FROM PRIOR BILL
No changes would alter the previous finding of no impact.
This legislation does have a change to Sec. 6(1)(b) which establishes that the legislature intends for the Ballard-Interbay State Lands
Development Authority (BISLDA) to be appropriately funded and staffed. Any appropriations made by the legislature would be used to
fund and staff the BISLDA’s Board of Directors and fulfill the obligations of this legislation. This would not result in any local
government revenue impacts.
SUMMARY OF CURRENT BILL:
No revenue impact.
SOURCES:
Department of Commerce, Research Services
Department of Commerce, Interbay Project: Interbay Public Development Advisory Committee’s Recommendations and Implementation
Plan (2019)
Washington State Military Department, FN 1173 (2021)
ESSB 6095 Sec. 1004 2018 c 2 s 1016 (2018)
King County, Office of Performance, Strategy and Budget
Local Government Fiscal Note Program, FN HB 1992 (2007)
Local Government Fiscal Note Program, FN HB 1989 (2019)
MRSC, Public Development Authorities
Page 4 of 4 Bill Number: 1173 S HB
FNS060 Local Government Fiscal Note
File and source
- File
- 2021-03-16_a28696_d231283_1173-fn-final-2-14-21.pdf
- Size
- 444,230 bytes
- SHA-256
- 3ea6066311db19113e56e9611d45e45a0cffcbedaf0cc6f58db03ba1e10776f8
- Original
- No public link identified.