Report - 2021 01 28 A28327 D225763 Bill Report 5211 Sbr Bfst Ta 21

Summary

A Senate Bill Report on SB 5211, an act authorizing tax increment financing for local governments, prepared for the Senate Committee on Business, Financial Services & Trade and dated as of January 21, 2021. It explains that traditional tax increment financing was held unconstitutional in Leonard v. Spokane and describes the TIF-lite programs the Legislature later authorized. The bill summary says local governments may designate increment areas by ordinance after a project analysis, may have up to three active non-overlapping areas, and must retire them after 25 years. It describes apportionment of property tax receipts, excluding state taxes for common schools, and authority to issue general obligation and revenue bonds, with revenue bonds limited to maturities of 30 years. The report closes with a staff summary of supporting public testimony and the list of persons testifying.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

                            SENATE BILL REPORT
                                  SB 5211

                                      As of January 21, 2021

Title: An act relating to tax increment financing.

Brief Description: Authorizing tax increment financing for local governments.

Sponsors: Senators Frockt, Mullet, Conway, Kuderer and Rolfes.

Brief History:
     Committee Activity: Business, Financial Services & Trade: 1/21/21.


                                     Brief Summary of Bill
           • Authorizes local governments to designate tax increment financing areas
             to leverage increased local property tax collections to fund public
             improvements.


SENATE COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS, FINANCIAL SERVICES & TRADE

     Staff: Clinton McCarthy (786-7319)

     Background: Tax Increment Financing. Traditional Tax Increment Financing (TIF) taps
     increased property taxes generated by private development, and applies those taxes to pay
     bonds issued to finance the public infrastructure supporting the development. A particular
     TIF district will be located within various overlapping taxing districts, and the TIF
     mechanism captures the increased property taxes of all overlapping taxing districts.

     Traditional TIF financing is unconstitutional under Washington State law. In Leonard v.
     Spokane, the court held that a 1982 TIF statute violated the Washington State Constitution,
     which requires the entire revenue derived from the common school fund and the state tax
     for common schools to be exclusively applied to the support of the common schools. The
     1982 TIF statute permitted forming TIF districts in which incremental property taxes,
     including the state property tax, could be applied to pay for public infrastructure. The court



     This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative
     members in their deliberations. This analysis is not part of the legislation nor does it
     constitute a statement of legislative intent.

Senate Bill Report                              -1-                                             SB 5211
     found the diversion of state property tax to be inconsistent.

     The Legislature has since authorized TIF-lite districts capturing only increases in local
     property taxes. TIF-lite districts must also work within the constitutional and statutory
     constraints of property taxes, including Washington's statutory 101 percent limitation on
     annual increases in property taxes. One exception to this limitation is for increased property
     taxes resulting from new construction or improvements. Accordingly, taxing districts
     generally can capture only the full increase in property taxes from new construction and
     improvements, and not the full increase in property taxes resulting from appreciation in
     property values within the TIF-lite district.

     TIF-lite programs, such as the Local Infrastructure Financing Tool Program, the hospital
     benefit zone statute, and the Local Revitalization Financing Program also capture excise
     taxes in addition to the capped local property taxes. Increased state excise taxes are
     contributed in the form of a state sales tax credit. The state sales tax credit is applied
     through imposition of an increase in the local sales tax rate. The increased local sales tax is
     credited against the sales tax that would otherwise go to the state, resulting in no net
     increase in the tax rate paid by taxpayers.

     Summary of Bill: Local governments are authorized to finance public improvements using
     tax increment financing through adopting an ordinance to designate an increment area.

     Prerequisites for Establishing a Local Tax Increment Financing Area. To establish an
     increment area, a local government must complete a project analysis of any public
     improvement project to determine the viability of the project by evaluating the potential
     costs and benefits of the project. A local government may be reimbursed by private
     developers to cover the cost of the analysis. Some of the elements that the analysis should
     consider include project job creation, impacts on affordable and low-income housing, and
     estimates on the amount of tax revenue generated from the project within the proposed
     increment area.

     The local government must make a finding that the improvements in the increment area:
        • encourage private development that increases the fair market value of property within
           the area;
        • development will be consistent with the permitting jurisdictions zoning and
           development standards;
        • development will be expected to occur solely through private investment in the
           foreseeable future; and
        • the assessed value of the site could not be reasonably expected to increase without the
           investment through tax increment financing.

     The increment area cannot comprise the entire jurisdiction of the local government. A local
     government may have a maximum of three active increment areas at any given time that do
     not overlap with each other. Increment areas must be retired after 25 years.


Senate Bill Report                              -2-                                         SB 5211
     A local government must also ensure that public improvements are expected to increase the
     fair market value of real property within an increment area.

     A local government can coordinate with other taxing districts and programs, and projects
     may be funded in part from revenue sources other than tax increment financing from the
     increment area.

     Local governments are required to:
        • publish notice in a legal newspaper that describes the public improvement and how it
           is planned to be financed; and
        • deliver a certified copy of the ordinance to the county treasurer, county assessor, and
           the governing body of each taxing district within the increment area.

     Apportioning Local Revenues for Local Governments with Increment Area Ordinances.
     The apportionment of revenue commences in the calendar year after the increment area
     ordinance passes. The county treasurer is directed to distribute receipts from taxes imposed
     on real property within the increment area as follows:
         • each taxing district receives the portion of its regular property taxes produced by the
           rate of tax levied;
         • a local government that created an increment area shall receive an additional portion
           of the regular property taxes levied by or for each taxing district upon the increment
           value within the increment area;
         • a local government with a increment area may agree to receive less than the full
           amount of its portion as long as any financing obligations are met;
         • the additional funds raised due to improvements in the increment area do not apply to
           property taxes levied by the state for the support of common schools; and
         • the apportionment of increases in assessed valuation in an increment area and its
           associated distribution of local government receipts must cease when tax allocation
           revenues are no longer necessary to pay the costs of the public improvement within
           the improvement area.

     Incurring Debt and Issuing Bonds. Local governments are permitted to incur general
     indebtedness, and issue general obligation bonds to finance the public improvements and
     retire debt in whole or in part from its tax revenue allocation from its TIF area. Debt from
     the TIF area may be payable from other tax revenues, the full faith and credit of local
     government, and other revenues. Local governments are permitted to require a private
     entity to provide adequate security to protect any public investment in the increment area.

     Local governments may issue revenue bonds within an increment area to fund revenue-
     generating public improvements. Revenue bonds with a maturity in excess of 30 years
     cannot be issued to support projects financed by an increment area.

     Appropriation: None.


Senate Bill Report                             -3-                                        SB 5211
     Fiscal Note: Available.

     Creates Committee/Commission/Task Force that includes Legislative members: No.

     Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

     Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: This bill is the result of discussions during
     the interim on how to help the economy recover. This tax increment financing vehicle does
     not touch state revenues. This public infrastructure financing is designed to facilitate
     private growth. This is a useful to tool for local governments that meet the constitutional
     requirements for the state. Washington and Arizona are the only two states that do not have
     tax increment financing. This is new approach to TIF does not require state investment.
     This is an accountable program that meets the constraints of the state constitution. This is
     an important tool to have in the toolbox. The barrier to entry needs to be low so they are
     accessible by local governments.

     Persons Testifying: PRO: Senator David Frockt, Prime Sponsor; Candice Bock,
     Association of Washington Cities; Tommy Gantz, Association of Washington Business;
     Jennifer Ziegler, TIF for Jobs Coalition; Gary Ballew, Washington Economic Development
     Association; Dave Zabell, City Manager, City of Pasco; Stephen McFadden, Port of Pasco;
     Diahann Howard, Port of Benton; Briahna Murray, contract lobbyist for City of Pasco; Greg
     Hanon, NAIOP; Nick Federici, City of Spokane, Washington Community Land Trust
     Coalition.

     Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: No one.




Senate Bill Report                            -4-                                        SB 5211


File and source

File

2021-01-28_a28327_d225763_bill-report-5211-sbr-bfst-ta-21.pdf

Size

11,843 bytes

SHA-256

c3d4b1af6cb8bbc8c43645e87cc46898567e5e83a44262a304ea6fb6c1a30cf1

Our copy

2021-01-28_a28327_d225763_bill-report-5211-sbr-bfst-ta-21.pdf

Original

app.leg.wa.gov