Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Blue Flame - FINAL Joint Motion re Dep. Protocol v2021.01.05_(184354725)

Blue Flame - FINAL Joint Motion re Dep. Protocol v2021.01.05_(184354725)

Date
2021-01-05

Summary

Document 72-1, filed January 5, 2021 in Blue Flame Medical LLC v. Chain Bridge Bank, N.A., John J. Brough and David M. Evinger, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00658 (LMB/IDD), in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, is Exhibit A: a Stipulated Agreement Regarding Remote Depositions. The caption also names Chain Bridge Bank, N.A. as third-party plaintiff against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Citing the COVID-19 pandemic and Rules 29(a) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it presumes that all depositions in the action will be remote and sets rules on definitions, remote oaths, platforms, notice, camera and microphone conduct, exhibits and technical problems. It ends with an undated, unsigned order line for Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis, Appendix A on minimum technical requirements, and Appendix B, an acknowledgment form.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD   Document 72-1   Filed 01/05/21   Page 1 of 18 PageID#
                                     513




                              EXHIBIT A
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD            Document 72-1      Filed 01/05/21      Page 2 of 18 PageID#
                                              514



                        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                        FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
                                  (Alexandria Division)


  BLUE FLAME MEDICAL LLC,

                                  Plaintiff,
                                                   Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00658 (LMB/IDD)
  v.

  CHAIN BRIDGE BANK, N.A.,
  JOHN J. BROUGH, and
  DAVID M. EVINGER,

                                  Defendants.


  CHAIN BRIDGE BANK, N.A.,

                          Third-Party Plaintiff,

  v.

  JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

                          Third-Party Defendant.


           STIPULATED AGREEMENT REGARDING REMOTE DEPOSITIONS

         WHEREAS, the COVID-19 pandemic has made conducting traditional in-person

 depositions difficult and inadvisable given health concerns and associated restrictions that have

 been put in place around the country;

         WHEREAS, it is uncertain when these health concerns will subside and when these

 associated restrictions will be lifted;

         WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to begin conducting depositions on or after January

 11, 2021;

         WHEREAS, pursuant to Rule 29(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Parties

 may stipulate that “a deposition may be taken before any person, at any time or place, on any
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD          Document 72-1        Filed 01/05/21      Page 3 of 18 PageID#
                                            515



 notice, and in the manner specified—in which event it may be used in the same way as any other

 deposition”;

          WHEREAS, pursuant to Rule 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the

 Parties “may stipulate … that a deposition be taken by telephone or other remote means”;

          WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that it will be necessary to conduct certain

 depositions remotely (the “Remote Depositions”), have agreed upon the means by which they

 will conduct the Remote Depositions, and wish to memorialize their agreement;

          NOW, THEREFORE, it is ORDERED that the Remote Depositions shall proceed

 subject to the following rules and procedures, which have been agreed upon by the Parties:

                                          DEFINITIONS

          1.     “Court Reporter” shall mean the individual designated by the Court Reporting

 Agency to administer and record the Remote Deposition.

          2.     “Court Reporting Agency” shall mean any entity agreed to and designated by the

 Parties to select a Court Reporter, Videographer, and Operator for each Remote Deposition.

          3.     “Defending Attorney” shall mean the attorney representing the Witness at the

 Remote Deposition. If the Witness is a current or former employee of one of the Parties, any

 attorney appearing on behalf of that Party shall also be considered a Defending Attorney.

          4.     “Lead Attorney” shall mean the attorney designated pursuant to Paragraph 29,

 below.

          5.     “Noticing Attorney” shall mean the attorney whose signature is affixed to the

 deposition notice corresponding to the Remote Deposition to which these rules and procedures

 apply, and/or any individual affiliated with that attorney’s law firm and authorized by that law

 firm to communicate about matters relating to the Remote Deposition.

                                                  2
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD           Document 72-1        Filed 01/05/21      Page 4 of 18 PageID#
                                             516



        6.      “Operator” shall mean the individual designated by the Court Reporting Agency

 to provide remote technological support to all Participants during the Remote Deposition.

        7.      “Participant” shall mean the Witness, the Questioning Attorney, the Defending

 Attorney, other attorneys or client representatives appearing on behalf of one of the Parties,

 paralegals or other individuals providing support to the attorneys, the Court Reporter, the

 Videographer, and the Operator.

        8.      “Parties” shall mean Blue Flame Medical LLC, Chain Bridge Bank, N.A., John J.

 Brough, David M. Evinger, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

        9.      “Questioning Attorney” shall mean the attorney who questions the Witness on the

 record during the Remote Deposition for the purpose of eliciting sworn testimony.

        10.     “Remote Deposition Video Platform” shall mean any videoconferencing service

 platforms agreed to and designated by the Parties for hosting the Remote Deposition.

        11.     “Remote Deposition Exhibit Platform” shall mean any software application

 agreed to and designated by the Parties for displaying exhibits during the Remote Deposition.

        12.     “Videographer” shall mean the individual designated by the Court Reporting

 Agency to record the Remote Deposition by videographic means.

        13.     “Witness” shall mean the individual who gives sworn testimony on the record

 during the Remote Deposition.

                  AGREEMENT TO CONDUCT REMOTE DEPOSITIONS

        14.     It is presumed that all depositions in this action shall be Remote Depositions.

 Any Party may notice a Remote Deposition by stating its intention to take a deposition by remote

 means in connection with scheduling a deposition by oral examination pursuant to Federal Rule

 of Civil Procedure 30. If any Party or non-party Witness objects to the taking of the deposition


                                                  3
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD           Document 72-1        Filed 01/05/21      Page 5 of 18 PageID#
                                             517



 by remote means, it must notify the Noticing Attorney, in writing, of the objection within five

 days of the Noticing Attorney’s notice of intent to take a Remote Deposition. The Parties agree

 to promptly confer in good faith with each other and, if applicable, the non-party Witness, to

 attempt to resolve any objections pursuant to this Paragraph. If the objection is not resolved, the

 person objecting may, pursuant to the Court’s Rules, schedule a telephone conference with the

 Court in an attempt to resolve the dispute, and thereafter if necessary file a motion for a

 protective order or a motion to quash with the Court seeking an order that a deposition may not

 be taken by the means originally noticed. The deposition may not take place until the Court

 resolves such motion.

        15.     Except as provided in Paragraph 14 above, the Parties hereby expressly waive all

 objections to any Remote Deposition, or to the use of any Remote Deposition testimony in any

 submissions to the Court, including at hearing or trial, based on the fact that the deposition was

 taken using remote means.

                COURT REPORTER, VIDEOGRAPHER, AND OPERATOR

        16.     Pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Remote

 Depositions will be conducted before a Court Reporter who shall have all of the authority of an

 officer appointed or authorized under Rule 28 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure with

 respect to administering Remote Depositions.

        17.     The Court Reporter may administer the oath or affirmation to the Witness through

 the Remote Deposition Video Platform from a different physical location than the Witness, and

 such oath or affirmation shall be deemed valid and effective pursuant to applicable law to the

 same extent as if the oath or affirmation had been delivered in the physical presence of the

 Witness.


                                                   4
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD          Document 72-1        Filed 01/05/21      Page 6 of 18 PageID#
                                            518



        18.     The Videographer shall record the Remote Deposition at the direction of the

 Court Reporter and shall not record the Remote Deposition during times when the Court

 Reporter suspends it. To the extent feasible, only video of the Witness shall be recorded unless

 the Noticing Attorney requests that video of the Questioning Attorney and/or published exhibits

 also be recorded. Audio of all Participants shall be recorded. Such recording shall be deemed a

 record of the Remote Deposition to the same extent as if the recording had been made in the

 physical presence of the Witness. For purposes of Rule 30(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil

 Procedure, the Videographer shall be considered to be acting in the presence and under the

 direction of the Court Reporter, so long as the Videographer is able to hear and take direction

 from the Court Reporter, even though the Videographer may be in a different physical location

 than the Court Reporter.

        19.     The transcript of each Remote Deposition shall identify all individuals attending

 the Remote Deposition, including the Witness, the Questioning Attorney, the Defending

 Attorney, any Participants, the Court Reporter, the Videographer, the Operators, and any other

 person connecting to the Remote Deposition Video Platform for any period of time during the

 Remote Deposition.

        20.     Any Party may ask the Court Reporting Agency to designate an Operator to assist

 the Participants with any technical issues that may arise during the Remote Deposition.

                            REMOTE DEPOSITION PLATFORMS

        21.     Remote Depositions shall be conducted using the Remote Deposition Video and

 Exhibit Platforms.




                                                 5
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD          Document 72-1        Filed 01/05/21     Page 7 of 18 PageID#
                                            519



        22.     In order to facilitate reliable use of the Remote Deposition Video and Exhibit

 Platforms, each attorney shall be responsible for acquiring, maintaining, and utilizing computer,

 audio, and video equipment that meets the minimum requirements set forth in Appendix A.

        23.     At least seven days prior to the Remote Deposition, the Defending Attorney shall

 confirm whether the Witness has access to the equipment set forth in Appendix A. If the

 Witness has no Defending Attorney, the Noticing Attorney shall confirm whether the Witness

 has access to such equipment.

        24.     At least one day prior to the commencement of each Remote Deposition, the

 Participants shall access the Remote Deposition Video and Exhibit Platforms and ensure that it

 and all Participants’ hardware, software, and internet connections are functioning properly,

 including that any required audio and video functionalities are functioning properly.

        25.     The Remote Deposition shall not commence until the Witness and an attorney for

 each of the Parties confirm that they each have appropriate access to the Remote Deposition

 Video and Exhibit Platforms.

        26.     All private chat features on the Remote Deposition Video and Exhibit Platforms

 shall be disabled.

                                             NOTICE

        27.     The Noticing Attorney shall be responsible for arranging the taking of a Remote

 Deposition with the Operator, providing the Operator with a copy of this Stipulated Order at least

 48 hours in advance of the deposition.

        28.     For each Remote Deposition, at least three calendar days prior to the Remote

 Deposition, the Parties’ attorneys shall exchange the names and e-mail addresses of any

 Participants other than the Witness. For those Participants who seek to appear on the record, the


                                                 6
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD           Document 72-1        Filed 01/05/21      Page 8 of 18 PageID#
                                             520



 Noticing Attorney shall provide their information to the Court Reporter in advance of the

 Remote Deposition in lieu of an oral roll call on the record.

        29.     The day before the Remote Deposition is taken, all Parties shall identify a Lead

 Attorney for the particular deposition.

        30.     The Noticing Attorney shall provide, or shall cause the Remote Deposition Video

 and Exhibit Platform(s) to provide, to the Defending Attorney (or Witness, if there is no

 Defending Attorney) all details necessary to gain access to each Remote Deposition, including

 but not limited to any web addresses, login credentials, and hardware and software requirements

 at least 48 hours prior to the date and time at which the Remote Deposition is scheduled to

 commence. Any Participant who intends be in the same room as the Witness during a Remote

 Deposition shall notify the Noticing Attorney and the Defending Attorney at least two calendar

 days prior to the Remote Deposition.

                        CONDUCT OF THE REMOTE DEPOSITIONS

        31.     The Witness, the Questioning Attorney, and the Defending Attorney shall keep

 their cameras turned on and unobstructed while the Remote Deposition is being conducted. All

 other Participants shall keep their cameras off at all times, except as otherwise directed by the

 Court Reporter. The Court Reporter and Videographer may also appear on camera as

 appropriate to facilitate the Remote Deposition. If the Witness is physically appearing in the

 same room with any Participant, separate video cameras shall show the Witness and the

 Participant. It shall be the responsibility of any Participant in the same room as the Witness to

 use physical distance, directional microphones, and/or other means to ensure that the Witness’s

 testimony does not suffer from echoes or feedback.




                                                  7
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD           Document 72-1        Filed 01/05/21     Page 9 of 18 PageID#
                                             521



        32.     The Witness shall use the audio through his or her computer or tablet (as

 applicable), and shall also have a phone connection available in case the device’s audio does not

 function properly.

        33.     Participants shall take care to minimize background noise during the conduct of

 the Remote Deposition that may interrupt the Remote Deposition. Participants other than the

 Witness, the Questioning Attorney, and the Defending Attorney shall place their microphones on

 mute except during times that they desire to speak on the record. Participants shall make best

 efforts to refrain from speaking at the same time as other Participants.

        34.     In order to minimize background noise, the Operator may, at his or her discretion,

 or at the direction of the Court Reporter, mute individual Participants’ lines when those

 Participants are not speaking, except that in no event shall the Court Reporter’s, Questioning

 Attorney’s, Witness’s, or Defending Attorney’s line be muted while the Remote Deposition is

 being conducted. Participants who have been muted shall retain the ability to unmute themselves

 during times when they desire to speak on the record.

        35.     The Questioning Attorney shall use the Remote Deposition Exhibit Platform to

 mark and publish all exhibits that are used during the Remote Deposition. The Questioning

 Attorney shall confirm that the Witness and Defending Attorney can access each published

 exhibit prior to questioning the Witness about that exhibit. Exhibits marked and shown to the

 Witness using the Remote Deposition Exhibit Platform shall be attached to the deposition record

 to the same extent as if the exhibits were physically marked and shown to the Witness. If, during

 the course of questioning, the Witness or the Defending Attorney wishes to review a document

 that is being displayed, the Questioning Attorney shall display all portions of the document

 reasonably requested by the Witness or Defending Attorney before requiring an answer to the


                                                  8
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD           Document 72-1        Filed 01/05/21      Page 10 of 18 PageID#
                                              522



  question. If the Questioning Attorney believes that the Witness or Defending Attorney is taking

  more than a reasonable amount of time to review a document and intends to go off the record

  such that the time for review is not counted against any time limit, the Questioning Attorney

  shall so state, and give other counsel an opportunity to object.

         36.     Except as otherwise provided in this Stipulated Order, no Participant shall permit

  anyone who is not a Participant to hear or view the Remote Deposition while it is being

  conducted.

         37.     If a technical issue prevents any Participant from being able to see or hear one or

  more of the other Participants clearly or to access published exhibits, the Participant

  encountering such technical issue shall promptly notify the other Participants. If the Participant

  encountering such technical issue is the Witness, a Lead Attorney, the Questioning Attorney,

  Defending Attorney, Court Reporter, or Videographer, the technical issues shall be noted on the

  record as soon as any Participant becomes aware of that issue, and the Court Reporter shall

  suspend the Remote Deposition until the technical issue is resolved. If those technical issues

  cannot be resolved, then the deposition shall be suspended until the concerns are resolved by the

  Court or through other means. If the Participant encountering such technical issue is not the

  Witness, a Lead Attorney, the Questioning Attorney, Defending Attorney, Court Reporter, or

  Videographer, the Court Reporter shall pause the Remote Deposition to provide an opportunity

  to promptly resolve the technical issue. If the Participant is unable to promptly resolve the

  technical issue, the Remote Deposition may proceed, provided, however, that the Participant may

  later make objections he or she could have made during the Remote Deposition had the technical

  issue not occurred, either by agreement of the Parties, which shall not unreasonably be denied, or

  by order of the Court.


                                                   9
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD           Document 72-1        Filed 01/05/21      Page 11 of 18 PageID#
                                              523



         38.     Any portion of the deposition that has been transcribed while a Lead Attorney,

  Questioning Attorney, or Defending Attorney is absent or experiencing technical difficulties as

  set forth in Paragraph 37 must be re-read upon the resolution of the technical difficulty and that

  Lead Attorney, Questioning Attorney, or Defending Attorney must be given an opportunity to

  object to any questions or answers that occurred in his or her absence.

         39.     Any time spent addressing technical issues will count as “off the record” time and

  shall not count against any time limit, provided that and starting when a Lead Attorney,

  Questioning Attorney, or Defending Attorney specifies it is “off the record.” If a technical issue

  prevents the Lead Attorney, Questioning Attorney, or Defending Attorney from speaking to

  other Participants, the Remote Deposition shall be deemed “off the record” from that time.

         40.     No Participant shall communicate or attempt to communicate with the Witness

  while the Remote Deposition is being conducted through any means other than the Remote

  Deposition Video and Exhibit Platforms, except that the Videographer or Operator may

  communicate with the Witness to resolve technical issues through means other than the Remote

  Deposition Video and Exhibit Platforms. Further, no Defending Attorney shall initiate a private

  conference with the Witness while a question is pending, except for the purpose of determining

  whether a privilege should be asserted, in which case the Defending Attorney must indicate he or

  she is doing so in advance. Notwithstanding this provision, subject to all otherwise applicable

  rules, the Defending Attorney may communicate privately with the Witness by any means any

  time during breaks in the Remote Deposition or if the Court Reporter otherwise suspends the

  Remote Deposition.

         41.     The Witness may not use text, e-mail, phone, or any means of communication

  other than the Remote Deposition Video and Exhibit Platforms during the deposition, other than


                                                  10
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD           Document 72-1         Filed 01/05/21      Page 12 of 18 PageID#
                                              524



  during breaks. The Witness may not view any web sites or view any documents, including

  personal notes, other than during breaks, except for those presented to the Witness by the

  Questioning Attorney during the course of that Questioning Attorney’s examination. During the

  taking of the deposition, the Witness will not view any document or material unless the

  document or materials are first identified on the record. All Parties stipulate that an objection for

  one shall be deemed an objection for all.

         42.     The Parties shall meet and confer regarding the timing for all Remote Depositions

  in different time zones.

         43.     The Parties shall meet and confer regarding whether any additional or different

  procedures are necessitated by the potential use of Confidential or Highly Confidential material,

  as defined in the Amended Stipulated Confidential Agreement and Protective Order (Dkt. 68), in

  a Remote Deposition. Such meet and confer shall take place on a date and time agreed to by the

  Parties. To the extent a Questioning Attorney anticipates seeking testimony from a Witness

  regarding Confidential or Highly Confidential material prior to such meet and confer, the

  Questioning Attorney shall provide notice to the Defending Attorney at least five calendar days

  prior to the Remote Deposition.

         44.     Any Defending Attorney who does not represent one of the Parties and who

  intends to represent a Witness during a Remote Deposition shall agree to be bound by this

  Stipulated Order and shall memorialize that agreement by executing a copy of the

  Acknowledgment and Agreement To Be Bound attached hereto as Appendix B.

         45.     The Parties will use reasonable efforts to cause employee Witnesses, former

  employee Witnesses, and non-Party Witnesses to agree to the protocols set forth herein for




                                                   11
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD           Document 72-1        Filed 01/05/21     Page 13 of 18 PageID#
                                              525



  Remote Depositions, however, insofar as any particular Witness cannot or will not agree, the

  Parties will discuss in good faith alternative protocols requested or required by such Witness.

         46.     The Parties may modify these procedures as appropriate by mutual agreement and

  reserve their rights to seek reasonable modifications of these procedures as appropriate in

  individual instances.

         47.     The Parties agree that no Witness shall be required to have their signing of the

  errata sheet notarized to be deemed effective.

         48.     The Parties recognize that disputes regarding this Stipulated Order and other

  issues regarding Remote Depositions may arise from time to time and agree to try to resolve

  those disputes in good faith before addressing any issue with the Court.




                                                   12
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD   Document 72-1    Filed 01/05/21      Page 14 of 18 PageID#
                                      526



  Dated: January 5, 2021

                                      /s/ Meredith K. Loretta______
                                      Meredith K. Loretta (92369)
                                      Albinas J. Prizgintas (pro hac vice)
                                      1875 Pennsylvania Ave NW
                                      Washington, DC 20006
                                      Tel.: (202) 663-6981
                                      meredith.loretta@wilmerhale.com

                                      Alan E. Schoenfeld (pro hac vice)
                                      7 World Trade Center
                                      250 Greenwich Street
                                      New York, NY 10007
                                      Tel.: (212) 230-8800
                                      alan.schoenfeld@wilmerhale.com

                                      Margarita M. Botero (pro hac vice)
                                      1225 17th Street, Suite 2600
                                      Denver, CO 80202
                                      Tel.: (720) 274-3135
                                      margarita.botero@wilmerhale.com

                                      Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant
                                      JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.




                                        /s/ Donald Burke_______
                                      Gary A. Orseck
                                      Matthew M. Madden
                                      Donald Burke
                                      ROBBINS, RUSSELL, ENGLERT,
                                      ORSECK, UNTEREINER &
                                      SAUBER LLP
                                      2000 K Street, NW, 4th Floor
                                      Washington, DC 20006
                                      gorseck@robbinsrussell.com
                                      mmadden@robbinsrussell.com
                                      dburke@robbinsrussell.com

                                      Counsel for Defendants,
                                      Third-Party Plaintiff


                                       13
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD   Document 72-1    Filed 01/05/21    Page 15 of 18 PageID#
                                      527



                                          /s/ Peter H. White_____
                                      Peter H. White
                                      Jason T. Mitchell (pro hac vice)
                                      Gregory Ketcham-Colwill (pro hac
                                      vice)
                                      SCHULTE ROTH & ZABEL LLP
                                      901 Fifteenth Street, NW, Suite 800
                                      Washington, DC 20005
                                      pete.white@srz.com
                                      jason.mitchell@srz.com
                                      gregory.ketcham-colwill@srz.com

                                      William H. Gussman, Jr. (pro hac
                                      vice)
                                      SCHULTE ROTH & ZABEL LLP
                                      919 Third Avenue
                                      New York, New York 10022
                                      bill.gussman@srz.com

                                      Counsel for Plaintiff




                                      14
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD   Document 72-1   Filed 01/05/21   Page 16 of 18 PageID#
                                      528



  IT IS SO ORDERED.

  DATE: _________________________      ____________________________________
                                         Hon. Ivan D. Davis
                                          United States Magistrate Judge
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD        Document 72-1      Filed 01/05/21     Page 17 of 18 PageID#
                                           529



                                       APPENDIX A

       MINIMUM TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REMOTE DEPOSITIONS

       1.    Witness, Defending Attorney and Questioning Attorney

                  a. Computer with an internet connection (connected via ethernet if
                     available). In the alternative, the Witness may use a tablet with an
                     internet connection.

                  b. Internet connection with a minimum speed for both downloads and
                     uploads of 5 Megabits per second (“Mbps”).

                  c. Integrated or USB webcam.

                  d. USB microphone, headset, or similar device.

                  e. Telephone (landline if available).

       2.    Other Participants

                  a. Computer or tablet with an internet connection.

                  b. Internet connection with a minimum speed for both downloads and
                     uploads of 1.5 Mbps.

                  c. Telephone.
Case 1:20-cv-00658-LMB-IDD          Document 72-1       Filed 01/05/21      Page 18 of 18 PageID#
                                             530



                                              APPENDIX B

                        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                        FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
                                  (Alexandria Division)


   BLUE FLAME MEDICAL LLC,

                                 Plaintiff,
                                                    Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00658 (LMB/IDD)
   v.

   CHAIN BRIDGE BANK, N.A.,
   JOHN J. BROUGH, and
   DAVID M. EVINGER,

                                 Defendants.


   CHAIN BRIDGE BANK, N.A.,

                         Third-Party Plaintiff,

   v.

   JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

                         Third-Party Defendant.



   ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND BY THE STIPULATED
           AGREEMENT REGARDING REMOTE DEPOSITIONS

         The undersigned hereby acknowledges that [print or type full name:]
  ______________________________ has read the Stipulated Agreement Regarding Remote
  Depositions in the above-captioned Action, that (s)he understands the terms thereof and that
  (s)he agrees to be bound by such terms.



  ________________________________________             ___________________________________
  Signature                                             Date


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.vaed.477405.72.1.pdf
Size
288,898 bytes
SHA-256
0c11663137edf80686e3e0e58ae96282a2bede34d3d01aa5fa851217e3899ca5
Our copy
gov.uscourts.vaed.477405.72.1.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top