State Surplus Property Program 2019 Annual Report (Washington State Department of Commerce, January 2020)
Summary
The State Surplus Property Program 2019 Annual Report, an inventory of state-owned real properties with recommendations per RCW 43.63A.510, issued in January 2020 as a report to the Legislature from the Washington State Department of Commerce. Its Summary of Findings states that of the six designated agencies required to report their inventories, four reported no surplus properties and two reported a total of 34 surplus properties that are vacant or available for sale or lease. Commerce determined that 25 of the 34 are suitable for further consideration for affordable housing development and nine are not. The report states that the designated agencies did not dispose of any public properties for affordable housing under RCW 39.33.015.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
- Issuer
- Congressional materials
- Document type
- Report
- Case
- 2020 Report Surplus Property Final 5Ed7C563 7D21 4967 A8A4 Faefc35830B6
Cite this document
“State Surplus Property Program 2019 Annual Report (Washington State Department of Commerce, January 2020).”
Original at app.leg.wa.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2020-report-surplus-property-final-5ed7c563-7d21-4967-a8a4-faefc35830b6/
, SHA-256 8c863ac8745733bdb03778e740b01842f8b83be1970f12b573676352f67b4cba.Full text
State Surplus Property
Program
2019 Annual Report Inventory of State-Owned Real Properties
and Recommendations per RCW 43.63A.510
January 2020
REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE
Lisa Brown, Director
Acknowledgments
Washington State Department of Commerce
Mark K. Barkley, Assistant Director
Local Government Division, Bruce Lund, Managing
Director
Community Assistance and Research Unit
Tina Hochwender, Section Manager
Brownfields / Direct Appropriation / State Surplus
Section
Emily Grossman, Lead Policy Alignment Advisor
Community Services and Housing Division
Allan Johnson, Program Manager
Bond Cap Allocation Program
Anne Fritzel, Senior Planner
Growth Management Services
Washington State Department of Commerce
Susan Butz
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM
1011 Plum Street SE
PO Box 42525
Olympia, WA 98504-2525
www.commerce.wa.gov
For people with disabilities, this report is available on
request in other formats. To submit a request, please
call 360.725.4000 (TTY 360.586.0772)
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM
Table of Contents
Executive Summary.........................................................................................................................4
Summary of Findings ......................................................................................................................5
State Surplus Property Inventory .....................................................................................................5
Summary of Recommendations.......................................................................................................8
Surplus Property Inventory Results..................................................................................................9
Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................15
Appendix A: Definitions from RCW 43.63A.510 and RCW 39.33.015 ...............................................16
Appendix B: Detailed Analysis of State Surplus Properties .............................................................17
Table of Contents for Properties....................................................................................................18
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 3
Executive Summary
Introduction
In many Washington communities, the rising cost of land and construction negatively impacts the ability of
affordable housing providers to develop housing for people with low incomes. This is especially true in high-
cost areas like the Puget Sound region.
Since 1993, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) has worked with designated state agencies to provide
an annual inventory of real property that is state-owned and available for lease. The purpose of this inventory
is to encourage effective use of surplus property for the development of affordable housing.
Background
Prior to legislation enacted in 2018 (3SHB2382), Commerce received inventory data of vacant surplus
properties from five state agencies. For more detail on the history of this program, please see the 2018 State
Surplus Property Program Report.1
The following language is excerpted from RCW 43.63A.510 and names the requirements of the State Surplus
Property Program:
1. The department must work with the designated agencies to identify, catalog, and recommend
best use of under-utilized, state-owned land and property suitable for the development of
affordable housing for very low-income, low-income or moderate-income households.
2. The designated agencies must provide an inventory of real property that is owned or
administered by each agency and is vacant or available for lease or sale. The department must
work with the designated agencies to include in the inventories a consolidated list of any property
transactions executed by the agencies under the authority of RCW 39.33.015, including the
property appraisal, the terms and conditions of sale, lease, or transfer, the value of the public
benefit, and the impact of transaction to the agency. The inventories with revisions must be
provided to the department by November 1st of each year.
3. The department must consolidate inventories into two groups: Properties suitable for
consideration in affordable housing development; and Properties not suitable for consideration in
affordable housing development.
4. In making this determination, the department must use industry-accepted standards such as:
location, approximate lot size, current land use designation, and current zoning classification of
the property.
5. The department shall provide a recommendation, based on this grouping, to the office of financial
management and appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the legislature by December 1st of
each year.
1 2018 State Surplus Property Program Report.
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 4
6. Upon written request, the department shall provide a copy of the inventory of state-owned and
publicly owned lands and buildings to parties interested in developing the sites for affordable
housing.
Summary of Findings
Of the six designated agencies required to report their inventories, four reported no surplus properties and
two reported they had a total of 34 surplus properties that are vacant or available for sale or lease.
The designated agencies did not dispose of any public properties for affordable housing under the authority of
RCW 39.33.015.
Of the 34 surplus properties inventoried, Commerce determined that 25 are suitable for further consideration
for affordable housing development, and nine are not.
Two surplus properties dropped off Parks and Recreation's 2018 inventory, and are not included in the 2019
Surplus Property Report: a 179-acre parcel in Packwood is being transferred to Lewis County for park
purposes; and another parcel in Ellensburg will be leased by a local environmental group for an environmental
center. DSHS reported only one surplus property in 2018, and this property is not included in the 2019
inventory because the site (land) has been identified as a proposed location for a mental health facility that
was in the agency's capital budget. Finally, DNR reported that a parcel near Port Townsend dropped off its
inventory. DNR provided no additional details for the removal of this property from its inventory.
The statute requires designated state agencies to report by Nov. 1 and Commerce to submit its analysis to the
Legislature by Dec. 1. Therefore, this preliminary determination of suitability for development is based on a
swift analysis of state agency reports in which properties that were obviously unsuitable for affordable housing
development were eliminated.
State Surplus Property Inventory
Key Findings and Inventory
Of the six designated agencies required to report their inventories, four reported no surplus properties, and
two reported they had a total of 34 surplus properties that are vacant or available for sale or lease.
The designated agencies did not dispose of any public properties for affordable housing under the authority of
RCW 39.33.015.
Determination of Suitability for Affordable Housing
As required by RCW 43.63A.510 (2), Commerce must consolidate inventories and determine which properties
are suitable for consideration in developing affordable housing. The determination must include the industry-
accepted standards of location, approximate lot size, current land use designation and current zoning
classification.
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 5
In developing the suitability criteria, Commerce aligned the four industry-accepted standards with the goals
and standards used in the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA)2 and Washington State
Affordable Housing Combined Funders Application3.
The GMA (Chapter 36.70 RCW, 1990, and WAC 365-196) requires cities and counties develop comprehensive
plans containing specific information and analysis. The goal is to focus urban growth and protect rural and
resource lands from sprawl. All development in counties and cities that plan under the GMA must adhere to
the city and county comprehensive plans.
A number of entities adhere to the Washington State Affordable Housing Combined Funders standards,
including:
Washington State Housing Trust Fund
City of Seattle Office of Housing
King County and Snohomish County local and HUD-funded affordable housing programs
A Regional Coalition for Housing (ARCH)
Washington State Housing Finance Commission for Low-Income Housing Tax Credits
Factors from the Combined Funders Application set best practices governing the development of publicly
funded affordable housing development sites in Washington state.
2
Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA)
3
Combined Funders Affordable Housing Application
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 6
The following chart details Commerce’s criteria in determining the property’s suitability.
Table 1: Affordable Housing Suitability Criteria
Industry- Criteria for Properties Suitable for Criteria for Properties NOT
Accepted Consideration in Affordable Housing Suitable for Consideration in
Standards Development Affordable Housing
Development
Impediments to development, such as
No impediments to development, such as steep
steep slopes, wetlands or flooding
slopes and the presence of significant critical areas
Remote location (too far from population
Located near population centers and services,
Location centers, services and transit)
preferably inside the urban growth area
No infrastructure (streets and utilities) in
Infrastructure (streets and utilities) in place
place
Property must be legally accessible
No legal or feasible ingress/egress
Approximate Dimensions of lot allow development under existing Not developable per codes, or some
Lot Size zoning parcels appear to be too small to develop
Natural Resource designation (forest,
agricultural, mineral) because they are
Should be residential, ideally within urban growth
generally very large parcels that are
area; parcels in rural areas outside urban growth
Current Land- remote from urban services. Parcels that
areas can be zoned at a density that would not
Use do not have a residential designation
allow for affordable housing unless in a “limited
Designation would be excluded, as changing the
area of more intensive rural development”
zoning would slow the development
(LAMIRD)
process beyond the 36-month goal
detailed in 3SHB2382 Section 1.
Zoning that is low density or overly
Current Zoning Current zoning permits all types of affordable
restrictive may be difficult to use for
Classification housing; allows higher-density development
affordable housing
Although there are exceptions, it is unlikely that lands with a natural resource lands designation, such as
forest, agricultural or mineral, would be suitable for affordable housing for several reasons:
1. The Washington State Growth Management Act goal for natural resource industries in RCW 36.70A.020
(8) encourages “the conservation of productive forestlands and productive agricultural lands, and
discourages incompatible uses.”
2. Resource lands are generally large parcels, designed to conserve land, and not promote development.
3. Parcels are often remote from essential public services, such as sewer, water and transportation services,
requiring the development of well and septic systems, and transportation alternatives.
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 7
Summary of Recommendations
Based on the criteria, Commerce has reviewed each property’s suitability for affordable housing development,
as required by RCW 43.63A.510. The first column in the chart on the previous page describes criteria that
suggests a property might be suitable for consideration.
Properties that fit these standards, upon further investigation, might not be suitable. The second column
describes criteria that tend to exclude a property from being suitable. Properties to which these criteria apply
likely are not suitable for affordable housing development, absent significant extenuating circumstances.
Of the 34 surplus properties inventoried, Commerce determined that 25 are suitable for further consideration
for affordable housing development, and nine are not.
Tables 2 and 3 below consist of each agency’s inventory, separated into two categories: properties suitable
and not suitable for consideration in affordable housing.
Appendix B contains a detailed analysis of 22 of the 25 properties that were determined to be potentially
suitable for affordable housing. Three properties had discrepancies between information gathered by agencies
and county assessors, preventing a determination of a property’s suitability, or the requisite data to determine
a property’s suitability could not be located.
The property analysis in Appendix B contains more detail than the 2018 report, whose deadline couldn't
accommodate this level of analysis. This is the type of information that affordable housing developers are
looking for when choosing sites for their various projects. If the State Surplus Program were to expand to
require more state agencies to report surplus inventories, this information would be a more valuable
resource. Meaning, the more properties included, the more useful the report. The properties should be
categorized by county and state whether they are rural or urban.
The potential to use available state properties for capital investments has gained attention among lawmakers.
This originated with the Legislature’s appropriation in the 2017-19 session, which directed Commerce to
produce a report on state surplus properties that could be developed into affordable housing. The 2019-21
capital budget included a similar appropriation to assess available school district properties for the
development of early learning facilities. Recent legislative discussions have also inquired about the usefulness
of expanding the state surplus inventory to include potential development of behavioral health facilities.
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 8
Surplus Property Inventory Results
Table 2: Surplus Properties That Might Be Suitable for Consideration in Affordable
Housing Development
Street Lot
Address or Zip Size Current Current
Nearest City County Code (Acres) Land Use Zoning Comments Agency
Intersection
Battle Ground
Lake State 4 - 5 miles
Parks &
Park NE Battleground Clark 98604 30.0 PF R-5 None from City of
Rec
Palmer Rd & Battleground
NE 171 St Ct
Ginkgo Forest / Near town of
Rural Parks &
Huntzinger Vantage Kittitas 98950 8.3 Range / Vantage
Working Rec
Rd. Residential (about 2 miles)
HJ Carroll-
About 1 mile
Dabob Bay Rural Parks &
near Brinnon Brinnon Jefferson 98320 3.0 None Listed from town of
Residential Rec
(Assessor Chimacum
map not
available)
Kitsap Unincorporate
Memorial-178 d rural/near Parks &
Poulsbo Kitsap 98370 4.0 Park Park
NW Park Poulsbo; Rec
Street would need to
be rezoned
Nolte-Veazie About 5 miles
Cumberland Black Parks &
King 98010 27.0 RA5 RA5 from Black
Rd SE/304th Diamond Rec
Diamond
Ave SE
1st lot appears
to be privately
Riverside- Nine Mile Rural owned 2nd lot Parks &
99026 3.18 RCV
Charles Rd-W Falls Spokane Conservation two triangles Rec
Highland Rd Near Nine
Mile Falls
Riverside-Old
Trails-
Urban Growth
between N Nine Mile Rural Parks &
Spokane 99026 40.0 RCV Area, near
Hayford Rd & Falls Conservation Rec
Spokane
N Old Trails
Rd
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 9
Street Lot
Address or Zip Size Current Current
Nearest City County Code (Acres) Land Use Zoning Comments Agency
Intersection
Riverside – 4
small lots – West
Rural Parks &
Government Spokane Spokane 99224 2.3 RCV Spokane/small
Conservation Rec
Way/Huston platted lots
Rd
Haley- Rural
Rural Fronts on Case Parks &
Jackson Lake Vaughn Pierce 98394 213.0 Conservatio
Unincorp. Inlet Rec
Road KPN n
Lake Isabella Flat pasture
– W Delght Designated land about 2 Parks &
Kamilche Mason 98584 188.0 Forestland
Rd/Golden Forestland miles from Rec
Pheasant Rd Shelton
Washougal-
NE Balcony
No notes Parks &
Drive/Off Washougal Clark 98671 474.0 R-5 FR-2
provided Rec
Washougal
River Road
Cascade RRC-NRL Fronts on
Island-HWY Marble (Natural Skagit River, Parks &
Skagit 98267 39.0 RRC-NRL
20 & S Mount Resource- may be in a Rec
Cascade Rd Lands) flood plain
Elbow Lake-
Public Public Includes 1/2 of Parks &
22600 Elbow Yelm Thurston 98567 318.0
Preserve Preserve lake Rec
Lake Rd
Willapa Hills
Trail – Robert
Bush Old Railroad
Parks &
Dr./Summit South Bend Pacific 98586 3.0 Commercial Commercial Turnaround
Rec
Ave site
(Assessor’s
map NA)
Grayland A-
Forest /
HWY 105 Grays Designated Parks &
Grayland 98547 1.3 Range / No tax id #
(Assessor’s Harbor Forest Land Rec
Residential
map NA)
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 10
Street Lot
Address or Zip Size Current Current
Nearest City County Code (Acres) Land Use Zoning Comments Agency
Intersection
South tip of
Kinney Pt- Off Parks &
Marrowstone Jefferson 98358 67.0 None Listed None Listed Marrowstone
Beach Drive Rec
Island
Can be
Moclips-
Grays subdivided Parks &
Hwy109 & Moclips 98562 5.2 Residential Residential
Harbor into multiple Rec
2nd St
lots
Minimum lot
size is 5000 sq.
ft. Current
S Forest St & Grays None market for a
Westport 98595 0.79 Residential 1 DNR
W Newell Ave Harbor Provided lot of 8000 sq.
ft. is from
$15,000 to
$50,000.
These parcels
Westport are in the
MUTCI same
S Forest St & Grays None
Westport 98595 0.85 mixed use neighborhood DNR
W Newell Ave Harbor Provided
Tourist but
Commercial have different
zoning.
These parcels
Westport are in the
MUTCI same
S Forest St & Grays None
Westport 98595 0.62 mixed use neighborhood DNR
W Newell Harbor Provided
Tourist but
Commercial have different
zoning.
Several cars
are parked on
the property.
Water and
sewer are at
4312 E None Light site.
E. Spokane Spokane 99217 0.38 DNR
Joseph Provided Industrial Interested
buyer has
contacted
DNR; may
result in a sale
in 2019.
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 11
Street Lot
Address or Zip Size Current Current
Nearest City County Code (Acres) Land Use Zoning Comments Agency
Intersection
Possible
building site. It
must be at
least 8500
square ft.;
however, city
of Kirkland rep
could not
116th Ave
determine
between NE None Low Density
Kirkland King 98033 0.11 amount of DNR
64th & Provided Residential
land. City
NE 61st
shows a much
smaller lot but
could not see
the second
number on
plans which is
the
93489OCK01.
Critical areas
are close to
this lot and
will need a
feasibility
study done to
see how much
wetlands are
E 57th ST/ E None
Tacoma Pierce 98404 0.55 Residential on the DNR
Q St Provided
building lot.
Minimum lot
size is 5000 sq.
ft. The
property does
have sewer
and water at
site.
Possible
5th Avenue at trespass.
None
Alder Street Toppenish Yakima 98948 0.16 Residential There are DNR
Provided
South several cars on
property.
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 12
Street Lot
Address or Zip Size Current Current
Nearest City County Code (Acres) Land Use Zoning Comments Agency
Intersection
This is not a
215 S Beech None building lot for
Toppenish Yakima 98948 0.12 Commercial DNR
Street Provided commercial. It
is too small.
Table 3: Surplus Properties That Are NOT Suitable for Consideration in Affordable
Housing Development
Street
Address or Lot
Nearest Zip Size Current Current
Intersection City County Code (Acres) Land Use Zoning Comments Agency
Crystal Falls-
7 miles from
HWY 20
Colville. Too
Colville-Tiger Parks &
Colville Stevens 99140 162.5 None Given None Given far from
Rd (Assessor Rec
services, no
map not
transit
available)
Very remote.
Ice Caves
Too far from Parks &
(Assessors Chelan Chelan 98816 159.0 None Listed None Listed
services, no Rec
map NA)
transit
Mt. Spokane-
Nelson Very remote.
Road-N of Rural Rural Too far from Parks &
Chattaroy Spokane 99003 160.0
Day Mt Rd Conservation Conservation services, no Rec
(Assessors transit
map NA)
Lake Newport
Very remote,
HWY
too far from
20/Silver Leaf Pend Parks &
Newport 98081 158.0 Unknown Unknown services, no
Road Oreille Rec
transit, no
(Assessors
legal access
map NA)
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 13
Street
Address or Lot
Nearest Zip Size Current Current
Intersection City County Code (Acres) Land Use Zoning Comments Agency
Sun Lake –
Lake Lenore – Very remote,
West of Lake too far from
Parks &
Lenore off Ephrata Douglas 98823 40.0 Lrg SA Lrg SA services, no
Rec
HWY 17 transit, no
(Assessors legal access
map NA)
Fronts on
O'Brian-Riggs- Skagit River,
HWY 20 & Marble remote, too Parks &
Skagit 98267 94.0 Forestland Forestland
Rockport Mount far from Rec
Cascade Rd services, no
transit
Old ski slope,
Satus Pass- remote, too Parks &
West 1 mile Goldendale Skamania 98620 168.0 Forestland Forestland far from Rec
of HWY 97 services, no
transit
Fronts on
Tilton River.
Tilton HWY
Remote, too Parks &
508 and Morton Lewis 98356 103.0 Forestland Forestland
far from Rec
Dodge Rd
services, no
transit.
Lots 1-12 -
Lots vary in
size. Further
research
Between S. needed. Scott
None Agriculture/
1st St/ W Almira Lincoln 99103 0.18 DNR
Provided Commercial Liebring from
Maple St
Lincoln
County states
it is not
owned by
DNR
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 14
Table 4: Zoning/Land Use Abbreviations
Zoning
Designation Meaning County
5 Residential Units Per Acre Clark
PF-R5
5 Residential Units Per Acre King
RA5
RCV Rural Conservation Zoning (Environmentally Sensitive) Spokane
FR-2 Forest and Agriculture Districts Clark
Natural Resource Lands (promote long-term, commercially Skagit
RRC-NRL significant resource use.)
Residential 1 – low density single-family with a high degree of Grays Harbor
R-1 protection against objectionable influences, building congestion,
lack of light, air and privacy
Unknown designation Douglas
Lrg SA
Conclusions
Housing supply and affordability issues affect every community in Washington. Between 2006 and 2016, rents
have increased 18 percent, and the median income for the population as a whole has increased only 3 percent,
according to the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey One-Year Estimates.
Affordable housing developers face strong competition for developable land, especially in the Puget Sound
region. Identifying and evaluating state surplus properties can be an additional tool to support efforts that
result in the increase of affordable housing stock in the state of Washington.
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 15
Appendix A: Definitions from RCW 43.63A.510 and
RCW 39.33.015
“Affordable housing” means residential housing that is rented or owned by a person who qualifies as a very
low-income, low-income, or moderate-income household or who is from a special needs population, and
whose monthly housing costs, including utilities other than telephone, do not exceed 30 percent of the
household’s monthly income.
“Very low-income household” means a single person, family, or unrelated persons living together whose
income is at or below 50 percent of the median income, adjusted for household size, for the county where the
affordable housing is located.
“Low-income household” means a single person, family, or unrelated persons living together whose income is
more than 50 percent but is at or below 80 percent of the median income where the affordable housing is
located.
“Moderate-income household” means a single person, family, or unrelated persons living together whose
income is more than 80 percent but is at or below 115 percent of the median income where the affordable
housing is located.
“Affordable housing development” means state-owned real property appropriate for sale, transfer, or lease to
an affordable housing developer capable of:
Receiving the property within 180 days
Creating affordable housing units for occupancy within 36 months from the time of transfer
"Designated agencies" means the Washington state patrol, the state parks and recreation commission, and the
departments of natural resources, social and health services, corrections, and enterprise services.
“Public benefit” means affordable housing for low-income and very low-income households as defined in RCW
43.63A.510, and related facilities that support the goals of affordable housing development in providing
economic and social stability for low-income persons.
“Surplus public property” means excess real property that is not required for the needs of or the discharge of
the responsibilities of the state agency, municipality, or political subdivision.
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 16
Appendix B: Detailed Analysis of State Surplus
Properties
The suitability of a property was defined by:
The characteristics of the lot, e.g., lot size
Its current land-use designation
Its location characteristics
A suitable property would therefore:
Have a lot size and land use that fits within zoning requirements
Permit single-family dwellings, multi-family dwellings and group homes
Have access to roads and basic utilities
Have no geological or environmental impediments to development
Be located near basic services, e.g., schools, medical facilities, and grocery stores
° Have access to employment centers
The results of this report are not conclusive; they merely reflect data provided by participating state agencies -
Washington State Patrol; State Parks and Recreation Commission; Department of Natural Resources;
Department of Social Health Services; Department of Corrections; and Department of Enterprise Services - and
digitally accessible data.
In some cases, discrepancies between information gathered by agencies and county assessors prevented a
determination of a property’s suitability. In other cases, the requisite data to determine a property’s suitability
could not be located.
Site-specific visits would be required to reconcile conflicting data, gather missing data, and verify the suitability
of these property for affordable housing development.
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 17
Table of Contents for Properties
Table of Contents …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…….2
Suitable ……………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………………….....................3
215 S Beech St …………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………....................3
Willipa Hills Trail ………………………………………………………………………….………………………………….…………..……5
XXX E 57th Street & East Q Street ………………………………………………………………………………….….…………..….7
Potentially Suitable ……………………………………………………………….…………….………………………………………….……..9
Kinney Point State Park ……………………………………………………….……….……………………………………..…….…….9
Lake Isabella ……………………………………………….....................................………………………………………..........11
Moclips ………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………………..…….....13
Nolte State Park ……………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………….…...……15
Riverside – Old Trails ………………………………………………….…………………………………….……………………..…..….17
S Forrest Street & W Newell Avenue …………………………………………………………..…………………………..…..….19
Washougal River Rd …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……...…..22
Not Suitable ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………….…..…24
116th Ave, Near 6224 116th Ave NE ………………………………………………………………….……………………..…..…24
4312 E Joseph ………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………...…26
Battle Ground Lake ……………………………………………………………………………………….……………………..……….…28
Cascade Island State Park ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…….30
Elbow Lake Park …………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………….....32
Gingko Huntzinger Rd ………………………………………………………………………..………………….………………………..34
Grayland Beach Oba State Park ……………………………………………….………………………………………..…….........36
Haley-Jackson Lake Rd KPN ……………………………………..…………………….…………………………………………….….38
HJ Carrol Park ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……….…….……40
Kitsap Memorial State Park ………………………………………………………………………………………….………………….42
Riverside - 4 Small Lots ………………………………………………………………………………..………….……..…..…..…..….44
Riverside - Charles Rd ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..........46
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 18
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 19
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 20
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 21
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 22
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 23
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 24
Kinney Point State Park
Parks & Recreation
Potentially suitable
Property Address Robbins Rd & Beach Dr, Nordland, WA
(including county): Jefferson County
Tax parcel ID/Link 921160000
State Agency Owner: Parks & Recreation
THE LOT
Lot size: 67 acres
Current zoning: Rural Residential – RR-20
Do the dimensions of lot allow Yes
development under existing
zoning?
Does current zoning permit No
multi-family developments?
Does zoning permit Yes
single family homes?
Does zoning permit three or Yes, co-housing.
more unrelated adults to live
together (group homes?)
Is zoning residential? Mixed? Primarily residential.
Details:
Other:
CURRENT LAND-USE DESIGNATION
Current land use: Rural Residential
Land use designation per Rural Residential
area’s comprehensive plan:
Is the property within No
the urban growth area?
If parcel is in a rural area No
outside urban growth areas,
is it in a “limited area of more
intensive rural development?”
(LAMIRD)*
Other:
LOCATION CHARACTERISTICS
9
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 25
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 26
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 27
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 28
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 29
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 30
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 31
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 32
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 33
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 34
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 35
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 36
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 37
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 38
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 39
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 40
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 41
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 42
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 43
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 44
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 45
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 46
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 47
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 48
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 49
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 50
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 51
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 52
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 53
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 54
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 55
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 56
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 57
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 58
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 59
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 60
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 61
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 62
STATE SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM 63
File and source
- File
- 2020_report-surplus-property-final-5ed7c563-7d21-4967-a8a4-faefc35830b6.pdf
- Size
- 4,054,318 bytes
- SHA-256
- 8c863ac8745733bdb03778e740b01842f8b83be1970f12b573676352f67b4cba
- Original
- app.leg.wa.gov