[Proposed] Order — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, et al. v. Robert M. Wilkinson, et al., Case No. 4:19-cv-04073-JST (Document 131-6)
- Date
- 2020-12-17
Summary
A proposed order filed January 21, 2021 as Document 131-6 in East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, et al. v. Robert M. Wilkinson, et al., Case No. 4:19-cv-04073-JST, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. It addresses the plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Stay of Final Rule's Effective Date Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 705. The proposed order would find that the plaintiffs have shown a likelihood of success on their claims that the Final Rule of December 17, 2020 is unlawful, that absent the requested relief the rule would cause irreparable harm, and that the balance of hardships and the public interest favor relief. It would preliminarily enjoin and stay the Final Rule under 5 U.S.C. § 705, and it ends with a Dated line and a United States District Judge signature block.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“[Proposed] Order — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, et al. v. Robert M. Wilkinson, et al., Case No. 4:19-cv-04073-JST (Document 131-6).”
Original at archive.org, dated 2020-12-17. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2020-12-17-plaintiffs-v-robert-m-wilkinson-et-al/
, SHA-256 768bf3422b0612d981b85429a8ffc72ef8247d8f828452d8eb48c04386b59238.Full text
Case 4:19-cv-04073-JST Document 131-6 Filed 01/21/21 Page 1 of 1
1
2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4 Case No.: 4:19-cv-04073-JST
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, et al.,
5 [PROPOSED] ORDER
Plaintiffs,
6
v.
7
Robert M. Wilkinson, et al.,
8
Defendants.
9
10
Having considered Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Stay of Final Rule’s
11
Effective Date Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 705, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
12
13 The Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of
14 their claims that the Final Rule of December 17, 2020, is unlawful. The Court further finds that,
15 absent the requested relief, the Final Rule will cause irreparable harm to Plaintiffs. The balance of
16
hardships tips in Plaintiffs’ favor, and the public interest will be served by a preliminary injunction
17
and stay of the Final Rule’s effective date.
18
The Final Rule is hereby preliminary enjoined and stayed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 705.
19
20 IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
23
24
25
Dated:
26
United States District Judge
27
28
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.344869.131.6.pdf
- Size
- 33,069 bytes
- SHA-256
- 768bf3422b0612d981b85429a8ffc72ef8247d8f828452d8eb48c04386b59238
- Original
- archive.org