Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Minute Sheet for proceedings held In Open Court on 07/27/2020 — USA v. Fayne, 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL (Document 39)

Minute Sheet for proceedings held In Open Court on 07/27/2020 — USA v. Fayne, 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL (Document 39)

What This Document Is

This is the CM/ECF minute sheet for a status conference held in open court on 2020-07-27 before Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker in United States v. Maurice Fayne (1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL). Hearing ran 10:13-10:23 a.m., held by Zoom (tape logged "ZOOM iCloud"), Deputy Clerk Sonya Lee-Coggins presiding over administration; three AUSAs appeared for the government (Michael Brown, Bernita Malloy, John Phillips).

Factual Summary

The proceeding's stated purpose was "defendant's attorney status." The court inquired of Fayne about his attorney status; Fayne advised he had not yet hired counsel. The court offered court-appointed counsel; Fayne declined and stated it was his desire to represent himself (proceed pro se). The court then inquired whether Fayne was familiar with the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Sentencing Guidelines, and discovery practices, among other procedures he would need to know. Fayne affirmed familiarity with handling a federal criminal case and reaffirmed his wish to proceed pro se. The hearing concluded on that basis with no further ruling recorded on the minute sheet.

Key Facts

  • Document title: CM/ECF minute sheet, status conference re: defendant's attorney status.
  • Document type: Minute sheet.
  • Document date: 2020-07-27.
  • Issuer/court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (Judge Linda T. Walker).
  • Case name: United States v. Maurice Fayne.
  • Outcome: Fayne declined court-appointed counsel and elected to proceed pro se, after the court confirmed his awareness of the relevant procedural rules.

Source Caveats

  • Refer to the source file for exact quotations, signatures, seals, and any redactions.
Date
2020-07-27

Cite this document

“Minute Sheet for proceedings held In Open Court on 07/27/2020 — USA v. Fayne, 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL (Document 39).” Original at ecf.gand.uscourts.gov, dated 2020-07-27. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2020-07-27-usa-v-fayne/, SHA-256 8dab2d4c68f94699cb28a5016b5de5ac8a702e21cfd7a80a3b9afd653e3408b9.

Full text

CM/ECF-GA Northern District Court                                   https://gand-ecf.sso.dcn/cgi-bin/GANDc_mkmin.pl?4725997793823-L_...
                    Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL             Document 39         Filed 07/27/20      Page 1 of 1




                                                  1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL
                                                        USA v. Fayne
                                                 Honorable Linda T. Walker

                                Minute Sheet for proceedings held In Open Court on 07/27/2020.


              TIME COURT COMMENCED: 10:13 A.M.
              TIME COURT CONCLUDED: 10:23 A.M.                     TAPE NUMBER: ZOOM iCloud
              TIME IN COURT: 00:10                                 DEPUTY CLERK: Sonya Lee-Coggins
              OFFICE LOCATION: Atlanta

         DEFENDANT(S):               [1]Maurice Fayne Present at proceedings
         ATTORNEY(S)                Michael Brown representing USA
         PRESENT:                   Bernita Malloy representing USA
                                    John Phillips representing USA
         PROCEEDING
                                    Status Conference;
         CATEGORY:
         MINUTE TEXT:               Parties appeared before the court for a status conference re defendant's
                                    attorney status. The court inquired of defendant his attorney status.
                                    Defendant advised the court that he still had not hired an attorney to
                                    represent him. The court asked defendant if he would like court-appointed
                                    counsel; defendant declined the court's offer and advised that it was his
                                    desire to represent himself. The court inquired of defendant whether or not
                                    he was familiar with the Federal Rules of CR Procedure, the Federal Rules
                                    of Evidence, Federal Sentencing Guidelines, and Discovery practices
                                    among a number of other procedures of which he would need to be
                                    familiar. Defendant affirmed that he was familiar with procedures of
                                    handling a federal criminal case and wanted to proceed Pro Se in his case.
                                    This portion of the hearing concluded.




1 of 1                                                                                                              7/28/2020, 9:41 AM


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.gand.278523.39.0.pdf
Size
141,224 bytes
SHA-256
8dab2d4c68f94699cb28a5016b5de5ac8a702e21cfd7a80a3b9afd653e3408b9
Our copy
gov.uscourts.gand.278523.39.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top