Joint Motion to Continue Hearing on Plaintiff’s
Summary
A Joint Motion to Continue Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction in 3M Company v. TAC2 Global LLC, United States District Court Middle District of Florida, case 8:20-cv-1003-T-35CPT. The parties state that the Court entered an order on Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order that was to remain in effect until June 3, 2020, when the Court will hear the preliminary injunction motion, and that they are engaged in meaningful settlement negotiations. They request that the hearing be heard on June 17, 2020, or as soon thereafter as the Court is available, and stipulate that the TRO will be extended until and through the new hearing date. The motion is dated June 1, 2020 with /s/ signatures for Amy E. Stoll, Counsel to Defendant, and Joseph M. Wasserkrug, Counsel for Plaintiffs.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
- Date
- 2020-05-08
Cite this document
“Joint Motion to Continue Hearing on Plaintiff’s.”
Original at ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov, dated 2020-05-08. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2020-05-08-t-35cpt-v-tac2-global-llc/
, SHA-256 fa296e32ac74e861d32248a5ec7250112492a5d33a8e74e30add707ade5db8ed.Full text
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION 3M COMPANY Plaintiff, CASE NO. 8:20-cv-1003-T-35CPT v. TAC2 GLOBAL LLC Defendant. / JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Defendant, TAC2 GLOBAL, LLC (“TAC2” or “Defendant”) and Plaintiff, 3M COMPANY (“3M” or “Plaintiff”), (collectively, ”The Parties”), pursuant to M.D. Fla. Local Rule 3.09, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby move to continue the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction for a minimum of fourteen (14) days and in support thereof, state as follows: 1. This is action consists of an eight-count Complaint asserting various causes of action related to trademark infringement under federal and state law. 2. Plaintiff served its Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction and Supporting Memorandum of Law on May 8, 2020. 3. A hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order was held on May 12, 2020. [D.E. 15]. 4. The Court entered an order on Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) that was to remain in effect until June 3, 2020, on which date the Court will hear Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction. [D.E. 25]. 5. The Parties are engaged in meaningful settlement negotiations to either resolve the entire Complaint or, alternatively, to resolve the preliminary injunction motion without the Case 8:20-cv-01003-MSS-CPT Document 39 Filed 06/01/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID 411 2 expense of a hearing. The parties agree that it is in their best interest to continue the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction scheduled for June 3, 2020 for at least fourteen (14) days while the parties attempt to come to a resolution. 6. Thus, The Parties request that the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction be heard on June 17, 2020, or as soon thereafter as the Court is available. 7. The Parties stipulate that the TRO will be extended until and through the new hearing date. MEMORANDUM OF LAW M.D. Fla. Local Rule 3.09 provides that the Court may continue a hearing for good cause. As stated above, The Parties have provided good cause to continue the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction due to the ongoing settlement negotiations between The Parties. There will be no prejudice to the Court or The Parties if the Joint Motion to granted. WHEREFORE, The Parties’ counsel respectfully request that this Court grant this Joint Motion to Continue Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction until June 17, 2020, or as soon thereafter as the Court will allow and extend the TRO until and through the new hearing date, and for any other relief the Court deems appropriate. Dated this 1st day of June, 2020. /s/ Amy E. Stoll________________ Amy E. Stoll, Esquire Florida Bar No. 150959 Richard C. Alvarez, Esquire Florida Bar No. 031615 OLDER LUNDY & ALVAREZ 1000 West Cass Street Tampa, Florida 33606 T: 813-254-8998 triallawyers@olalaw.com astoll@olalaw.com Counsel to Defendant /s/ Joseph M. Wasserkrug_______ Joseph M. Wasserkrug Florida Bar No. 112274 333 SE 2nd Avenue, Suite 4500 Miami Florida, 33131-4336 T: 305-347-6501 jwasserkrug@mwe.com Michael W. Weaver Illinois Bar No. 6291021 444 W. Lake Street, Suite 4000 Chicago, IL 60606-0029 T: 312-984-5820 mweaver@mwe.com Counsel for Plaintiffs Case 8:20-cv-01003-MSS-CPT Document 39 Filed 06/01/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID 412
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.flmd.376843.39.0.pdf
- Size
- 960,880 bytes
- SHA-256
- fa296e32ac74e861d32248a5ec7250112492a5d33a8e74e30add707ade5db8ed
- Original
- PACER (login required)