Related Case Order — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump, Case 3:18-cv-06810-JST (Document 118)
Summary
A Related Case Order, Document 118, filed July 17, 2019, in Case 3:18-cv-06810-JST in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The order states that a Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship has been filed and that the time for filing an opposition has passed. The judge assigned to East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump, 18-cv-06810-JST states a finding that the more recently filed cases initialed on the form are related and shall be reassigned; the form lists 19-cv-04073-WHO. It sets a telephonic case management conference at 8:30 a.m. on July 18, 2019, and the signature block names Jon S. Tigar, United States District Judge.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
- Date
- 2019-07-18
Cite this document
“Related Case Order — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump, Case 3:18-cv-06810-JST (Document 118).”
Original at archive.org, dated 2019-07-18. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2019-07-18-east-bay-sanctuary-covenant-v-trump-18-cv-06810-jst/
, SHA-256 97c736e36bd87236d7ad53041ff1c6bcc65129301cec36bc1ad9657f87851c33.Full text
Case 3:18-cv-06810-JST Document 118 Filed 07/17/19 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RELATED CASE ORDER
A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a
Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has
been filed. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. As the judge
assigned to
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump, 18-cv-06810-JST
I find that the more recently filed case(s) that I have initialed below are related to the case
assigned to me, and such case(s) shall be reassigned to me. Any cases listed below that are not
related to the case assigned to me are referred to the judge assigned to the next-earliest filed case
for a related case determination.
Case Title Related Not Related
19-cv-04073-WHO East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr X
ORDER
The parties are instructed that all future filings in any reassigned case are to bear the
initials of the newly assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management
conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the
dates for the conference, disclosures and report required by FRCivP 16 and 26 accordingly.
Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be re-
noticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge; any deadlines set by the ADR Local
Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to
govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned
judge.
The Court hereby sets a telephonic case management conference at 8:30 a.m. on July
18, 2019. Prior to the conference, counsel shall contact the courtroom deputy at 415-522-2036 or
jstcrd@cand.uscourts.gov to provide a single direct dial number at which all counsel can be
reached for the conference.
Dated: July 17, 2019 By:
Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge
1
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.334557.118.0.pdf
- Size
- 57,010 bytes
- SHA-256
- 97c736e36bd87236d7ad53041ff1c6bcc65129301cec36bc1ad9657f87851c33
- Original
- archive.org