Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr, Case 4:19-cv-04073, Doc. 14 (Filed 07/18/19)

Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr, Case 4:19-cv-04073, Doc. 14 (Filed 07/18/19)

Summary

A Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording, Document 14 filed 07/18/19 in Case 4:19-cv-04073-JST in the United States District Court, Northern District of California. The notice states that the case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project under General Order 65, and that the parties' consent is required before any proceedings may be recorded. It states that consent will be presumed unless a party submits an Objection to Request for Video Recording form, and that parties objecting are asked to communicate the reasons for declining to participate. The notice names Susan Y. Soong, Clerk of Court.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Date
2019-07-18

Cite this document

“Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr, Case 4:19-cv-04073, Doc. 14 (Filed 07/18/19).” Original at archive.org, dated 2019-07-18. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2019-07-18-covid-era-misc/, SHA-256 623f008a5d7f05695499dc7f306e429eaa1ff575357f8667531f7e89535c0225.

Full text

          Case 4:19-cv-04073-JST Document 14 Filed 07/18/19 Page 1 of 1




                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                           NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


                 NOTICE OF ELIGIBILITY FOR VIDEO RECORDING



       This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot

Project. See General Order 65 and cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. The parties’ consent is required

before any proceedings in this case may be recorded. If a party, the presiding judge, or a

member of the media requests that a proceeding be recorded, consent of the parties will be

presumed unless a party submits an Objection to Request for Video Recording form as directed

by the Cameras in the Courtroom Procedures.



       Parties objecting to video recording are asked, for research purposes, to communicate to

the Court the reasons for declining to participate. If you decline to participate, you should

candidly convey the reasons for your decision. Whether you agree to participate or decline to

participate will have no effect on your case whatsoever.




                                                      Susan Y. Soong, Clerk of Court

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.344869.14.0.pdf
Size
31,981 bytes
SHA-256
623f008a5d7f05695499dc7f306e429eaa1ff575357f8667531f7e89535c0225
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.344869.14.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top