Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order Reassigning Case — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, et al., Case No. 19-cv-04073 (Document 7)

Order Reassigning Case — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, et al., Case No. 19-cv-04073 (Document 7)

Date
2019-07-17

Summary

An Order Reassigning Case dated July 17, 2019, filed as Document 7 in East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, et al. v. William Barr, et al., Case 3:19-cv-04073-WHO, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Issued over the name of Clerk Susan Y. Soong, the order reassigns the case under General Order No. 44 to the Honorable William H. Orrick in the San Francisco division and directs that future filings bear the initials WHO. It vacates all scheduled hearing and trial dates while leaving existing briefing schedules, ADR compliance and discovery deadlines unchanged, and requires motions to be renoticed. Document 7-1, a Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording under General Order 65, states that the assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project and explains how parties may object to recording.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order Reassigning Case — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, et al., Case No. 19-cv-04073 (Document 7).” Original at archive.org, dated 2019-07-17. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2019-07-17-plaintiffs-v-william-barr-et-al-f08e0d16-1/, SHA-256 f08e0d1634ee4bf3e6d22ad0750e3d22037643e4a5850d904aa701640058ecf3.

Full text

                                           Case 3:19-cv-04073-WHO Document 7 Filed 07/17/19 Page 1 of 1




                                   1

                                   2

                                   3

                                   4                                   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                                   5                                  NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

                                   6

                                   7     EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT,                        Case No. 19-cv-04073-LB (INT)
                                         et al.,
                                   8                    Plaintiffs,                          ORDER REASSIGNING CASE
                                   9             v.
                                  10
                                         WILLIAM BARR, et al.,
                                  11                    Defendants.
                                  12


 United States District Court
                                  13          IT IS ORDERED that this case has been reassigned using a proportionate, random and

                                  14   blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to the Honorable William H. Orrick in the San

                                  15   Francisco division for all further proceedings. Counsel are instructed that all future filings shall



Northern District of California
                                  16   bear the initials WHO immediately after the case number.

                                  17          All hearing and trial dates presently scheduled are vacated. However, existing briefing

                                  18   schedules for motions remain unchanged. Motions must be renoticed for hearing before the judge

                                  19   to whom the case has been reassigned, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior

                                  20   briefing schedule. Other deadlines such as those for ADR compliance and discovery cutoff also

                                  21   remain unchanged.

                                  22   Dated: July 17, 2019

                                  23

                                  24
                                                                                         Susan Y. Soong
                                  25                                                     Clerk, United States District Court
                                  26

                                  27

                                  28   A true and correct copy of this order has been served by mail upon any pro se parties.
         Case 3:19-cv-04073-WHO Document 7-1 Filed 07/17/19 Page 1 of 1




                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                           NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


                 NOTICE OF ELIGIBILITY FOR VIDEO RECORDING



       This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot

Project. See General Order 65 and cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. The parties’ consent is required

before any proceedings in this case may be recorded. If a party, the presiding judge, or a

member of the media requests that a proceeding be recorded, consent of the parties will be

presumed unless a party submits an Objection to Request for Video Recording form as directed

by the Cameras in the Courtroom Procedures.



       Parties objecting to video recording are asked, for research purposes, to communicate to

the Court the reasons for declining to participate. If you decline to participate, you should

candidly convey the reasons for your decision. Whether you agree to participate or decline to

participate will have no effect on your case whatsoever.




                                                      Susan Y. Soong, Clerk of Court

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.344869.7.0.pdf
Size
55,392 bytes
SHA-256
f08e0d1634ee4bf3e6d22ad0750e3d22037643e4a5850d904aa701640058ecf3
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.344869.7.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top