Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr, Case 4:19-cv-04073, Doc. 7-1 (Filed 07/17/19)

Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr, Case 4:19-cv-04073, Doc. 7-1 (Filed 07/17/19)

Summary

Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording, Document 7-1, filed 07/17/19 in Case 4:19-cv-04073-JST in the Northern District of California. It states the case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project, under General Order 65. The parties' consent is required before any proceedings may be recorded. If a party, the presiding judge or a member of the media requests recording, consent of the parties will be presumed unless a party submits an Objection to Request for Video Recording form. It is issued by Susan Y. Soong, Clerk of Court.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Date
2019-07-17

Cite this document

“Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr, Case 4:19-cv-04073, Doc. 7-1 (Filed 07/17/19).” Original at archive.org, dated 2019-07-17. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2019-07-17-covid-era-misc-88490fd6-1/, SHA-256 88490fd65e8d5c0dc2c1a5391c5c51f61cafa4106f55984b59a6d2f90edd980b.

Full text

         Case 4:19-cv-04073-JST Document 7-1 Filed 07/17/19 Page 1 of 1




                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                           NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


                 NOTICE OF ELIGIBILITY FOR VIDEO RECORDING



       This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot

Project. See General Order 65 and cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. The parties’ consent is required

before any proceedings in this case may be recorded. If a party, the presiding judge, or a

member of the media requests that a proceeding be recorded, consent of the parties will be

presumed unless a party submits an Objection to Request for Video Recording form as directed

by the Cameras in the Courtroom Procedures.



       Parties objecting to video recording are asked, for research purposes, to communicate to

the Court the reasons for declining to participate. If you decline to participate, you should

candidly convey the reasons for your decision. Whether you agree to participate or decline to

participate will have no effect on your case whatsoever.




                                                      Susan Y. Soong, Clerk of Court

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.344869.7.1.pdf
Size
37,646 bytes
SHA-256
88490fd65e8d5c0dc2c1a5391c5c51f61cafa4106f55984b59a6d2f90edd980b
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.344869.7.1.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top