Agreed Order Granting Objection to Proof of Claim— Panthera Enterprises, LLC
Summary
Agreed order signed September 29th, 2021 by Paul M. Black, United States Bankruptcy Judge, in the Chapter 7 case of Panthera Enterprises, LLC, Northern District of West Virginia (Case No. 2:19-bk-00787, Doc 394). It grants the Chapter 7 Trustee's objection to proof of claim No. 5 filed by the Sheriff of Hardy County. The Trustee asserted the claim is an ad valorem tax claim on personal property the Debtor did not own or possess and is not a priority claim. The Sheriff did not file a response; SMI, LLC, TR&L, LLC and Roy Baker Duncan III responded without opposing the relief. The Court finds the Debtor was neither owner nor possessor of the property and orders claim no. 5 disallowed, making no finding on who owned it.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
- Date
- 2010-08-02
Cite this document
“Agreed Order Granting Objection to Proof of Claim— Panthera Enterprises, LLC.”
Original at ecf.wvnb.uscourts.gov, dated 2010-08-02. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2010-08-02-19804264429/
, SHA-256 90df027109cda139c4c9f10b062194d9e3e6326f8e70e57514727c3d38e0fccd.Full text
No. 2:19-bk-00787 Doc 394 _ Filed 09/29/21 Entered 09/29/21 11:34:35 Page1of3 SIGNED: September 29th, 2021 Vy, W/E (lat _ THIS ORDER HAS BEEN ENTERED ON THE DOCKET. PLEASE SEE DOCKET FOR ENTRY DATE. Paul M. Black UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA IN RE: PANTHERA ENTERPRISES, LLC Case No. 19-00787 Debtor. Chapter 7 AGREED ORDER GRANTING OBJECTION OF TRUSTEE TO PROOF OF CLAIM No. 5 FILED BY THE SHERIFF OF HARDY COUNTY On a day prior came Aaron C. Amore, Chapter 7 Trustee, for the Estate of Panthera Enterprises, LLC (“Debtor”) with an Objection to the proof of claim of the Sheriff of Hardy County No. 5, pursuant to Bankruptcy 11 U.S.C §§501 & 507 and Bankruptcy Rule 3001. The matter has been noticed and is now ripe for the Court’s consideration of the objection. The Trustee objects as the claim is not a priority claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §507(a)(8). Further, the Trustee asserted this is an ad valorem tax claim as it relates to personal property that was not owned and/or possessed by the Debtor. The Trustee asserts that the Debtor is not liable for the payment of this claim and that the Debtor did not possess, control and/or sell any personal property that would form the basis of the debt asserted in claim no. 5. The Sheriff of Hardy County, West Virginia (hereafter “Sheriff’) did not file a No. 2:19-bk-00787 Doc 394 Filed 09/29/21 Entered 09/29/21 11:34:35 Page 2of3 response to the objection. A response was filed by SMI, LLC, TR&L, LLC and Roy Baker Duncan III which did not oppose the relief sought by the Trustee but sought to clarify the representations of ownership related to the personal property that formed the basis of the claim. SMI, LLC, TR&L, LLC and Roy Baker Duncan III asserted that they did not possess, control and/or sell any personal property that would form the basis of the debt asserted in claim no. 5. The Court finds that claim no. 5 filed by the Sheriff of Hardy County, West Virginia appears to be based upon personal property tax assessments for property owned or possessed by Panthera Training Center, LLC and/or other third parties and not the debtor entity. The Debtor is not the “taxpayer” as defined by §11-3-1 (f)(4) and is not liable for the taxes assessed. In addition, the claim was filed as a priority claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §507(a)(8). West Virginia law appears to grant the Sheriff a lien on personal property as to the owner and/pr possessor of property. See West Virginia Code §11A-1-2. The Sheriff's remedy appears to be liquidation of said personal property by state law and not a priority claim for said taxes. The Court makes no finding as to the ownership of the personal property or the legal taxpayer and/or possessor but does finds specifically that the Debtor was neither the owner nor possessor of the personal property that forms the basis of claim no. 5. Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the objection of the Trustee to the proof of No. 2:19-bk-00787 Doc 394 _ Filed 09/29/21 Entered 09/29/21 11:34:35 Page3of3 claim number 5 of Sheriff of Hardy County, West Virginia is hereby GRANTED and claim no. 5is DISALLOWED. Prepared by; /s/Aaron C.. Amore Aaron C. Amore Chapter 7 Trustee Seen and Agreed: /s/ Kathy M. Santa Barbara Kathy M. Santa Barbara, WVSB #5960 The Law Office of Kathy M. Santa Barbara, PLLC Counsel for SMI, LLC, TR&L, LLC and Roy Baker Duncan IIT
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.wvnb.75953.394.0.pdf
- Size
- 258,265 bytes
- SHA-256
- 90df027109cda139c4c9f10b062194d9e3e6326f8e70e57514727c3d38e0fccd
- Original
- PACER (login required)