Indictment — United States v. Benjamin Adu Acheampong (Southern District of Ohio)
Summary
An indictment in United States of America versus Benjamin Adu Acheampong, Case 1:23-cr-00120-SJD, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, filed December 6, 2023 as Doc. 11. Count 1 charges conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1349 and alleges that members of the conspiracy used false dating-website profiles to induce victims to send money. Count 2 charges wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343; Count 3 and Count 4 charge international money laundering, and Count 5 and Count 6 concealment money laundering. Count 7 charges a false statement in a PPP loan application that, according to the indictment, caused the SBA to approve a $20,833 PPP loan. The indictment closes with forfeiture allegations, the A TRUE BILL line and the signature block of United States Attorney Kenneth L. Parker.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Indictment — United States v. Benjamin Adu Acheampong (Southern District of Ohio).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/11-indictment-as-to-benjamin-adu-acheampong-1-entry-doc1-id-fro-e2a34b3135/
, SHA-256 1372e2b315fc7a24fd2562693b902694e5b143d32a503c6e4a90988f55b1a4e3.Full text
Case: 1:23-cr-00120-SJD Doc #: 11 Filed: 12/06/23 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 40
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
CASENO. 2 C
JUDGE J-~()
./
v.
INDICTMENT
BENJAMIN ADU ACHEAMPONG,
18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2)
Defendant. 18 u.s.c. § 1343
18 u.s.c. § 1349
18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(l)(B)(i)
18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(2)(B)
Forfeiture Allegations
THE GRAND JURY CHARGES:
1. At times relevant to this Indictment, the defendant, BENJAMIN ADU
ACHEAMPONG, was a resident of the Southern District of Ohio.
COUNT 1
(Conspiracy to Commit Mail Fraud
and to Commit Wire Fraud)
The Conspiracy
2. Paragraph 1 of the Indictment is incorporated here.
3. From in or about January 2019 through in or about July 2021, in the Southern District
of Ohio and elsewhere, the defendant, BENJAMIN ADU ACHEAMPONG, knowingly and
intentionally conspired and agreed with others to commit the following offenses, that is:
a. to devise and intend to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud and to obtain money
and property by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations,
and promises, and for the purpose of executing the scheme and artifice, to knowingly
Case: 1:23-cr-00120-SJD Doc #: 11 Filed: 12/06/23 Page: 2 of 8 PAGEID #: 41
cause items to be delivered by U.S. Mail and by private and commercial interstate
carrier, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1341; and
b. to devise and intend to devise a scheme to defraud, and to obtain money and property
by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises,
and for the purpose of executing the scheme and artifice, to knowingly transmit and
cause to be transmitted by means of wire communication in interstate commerce
writings, signs, signals, and pictures, in violation of Title 18, United States Code,
Section 1343.
Purpose and Object of the Conspiracy
4. The purpose and object of the conspiracy was for the coconspirators, including
BENJAMIN ADU ACHEAMPONG, to unlawfully enrich themselves by obtaining money by
false and fraudulent pretenses.
Manner and Means of the Conspiracy
5. The manner and means by which the coconspirators, including BENJAMIN ADU
ACHEAMPONG, sought to accomplish the objectives of the conspiracy included the
following:
6. As part of and in furtherance of the conspiracy, members of the conspiracy created
profiles on dating websites using false information and pictures of other individuals (the "False
Profiles").
7. As part of and in furtherance of the conspiracy:
a. Members of the conspiracy used False Profiles to initiate contact with victims via the
internet, pretending to be the person pictured in the False Profile.
2
Case: 1:23-cr-00120-SJD Doc #: 11 Filed: 12/06/23 Page: 3 of 8 PAGEID #: 42
b. Once members of the conspiracy initiated contact with a victim, they communicated
with the victim by online instant messaging services, email, and telephone, among other ways.
By expressing romantic interest in the victim, members of the conspiracy misled the victim
into believing he or she was in a relationship with the person pictured in the False Profile.
c. Members of the conspiracy commonly represented to the victim that the person
pictured in the False Profile was living abroad, or that there was some other justification for
why the person pictured in the False Profile was never able to meet the victim in person.
d. Once the victim believed he or she was in a romantic relationship with the person
pictured in the False Profile, members of the conspiracy made false representations to induce
the victim to transfer money, or to mail checks, to members of the conspiracy, including to
BENJAMIN ADU ACHEAMPONG in the Southern District of Ohio, by falsely representing
that a person pictured in a False Profile was expecting a large inheritance of gold and needed
financial assistance to bring it to the United States, that the person in the False Profile needed
money for a plane ticket, or that the person in the False Profile needed money for medical
expenses.
e. Members of the conspiracy commonly directed victims to mail checks, often for tens
of thousands of dollars, to BENJAMIN ADU ACHEAMPONG.
f. Members of the conspiracy received more than $1 million in proceeds of the scheme
in multiple bank accounts, including bank accounts opened in the name of ABA Automotive &
Export LLC, an Ohio LLC created by BENJAMIN ADU ACHEAMPONG, and for which he
was the sole registered agent.
g. The money the victims sent to the coconspirators was used by individuals other than
those pictured in the False Profiles and for purposes other than those represented to the victims.
3
Case: 1:23-cr-00120-SJD Doc #: 11 Filed: 12/06/23 Page: 4 of 8 PAGEID #: 43
h. Members of the conspiracy laundered the proceeds of the scheme by making wire
transfers, including to accounts in Africa, and falsely representing that the transfers were for,
among other things, paying workers and family expenses.
All in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349.
COUNT2
(Wire Fraud)
8. Paragraphs 1 and 4 through 7 of the Indictment are incorporated here.
9. From in or about April 2020 through in or about July 2021, in the Southern District
of Ohio and elsewhere, the defendant, BENJAMIN ADU ACHEAMPONG, and others
known and unknown to the grand jury, knowingly, and with the intent to defraud, devised and
willfully participated in the above-described scheme and artifice to defraud and obtain money
by materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises.
10. On or about May 12, 2020, in the Southern District of Ohio and elsewhere, for the
purpose of executing the above-described scheme and artifice to defraud and deprive, the
defendant, BENJAMIN ADU ACHEAMPONG, knowingly caused to be transmitted by
means of wire communication in interstate commerce a writing, sign, signal, and picture, to
wit: an email to R.M. reading "Yes that's correct. Thank you for letting me know."
All in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343.
COUNTS3-4
(International Money Laundering)
11. On or about the dates listed below, in the Southern District of Ohio and elsewhere,
the defendant, BENJAMIN ADU ACHEAMPONG, did transmit and transfer funds, and
cause funds to be transmitted and transferred, that is, the funds listed below, from a place in the
United States to a place outside the United States, knowing that the funds involved in the
4
Case: 1:23-cr-00120-SJD Doc #: 11 Filed: 12/06/23 Page: 5 of 8 PAGEID #: 44
transmission and transfer represented the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity, and which
funds, in fact, involved the proceeds of specified unlawful activity, namely, Mail Fraud in
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 and Wire Fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and knowing
that such transmission and transfer was designed in whole and in part to conceal and disguise
the nature, location, source, ownership, and control of the proceeds of specified unlawful
activity:
Count Date, on or about Transfer
3 6/2/20 Wire Transfer for $10,000 from the Chase Bank account with
account number ending in 8712, with the memo line "Pis
Make Sure You Pay The Worker Assoon As Possible
Plsfamily"
4 6/5/20 Wire Transfer for $8,000 from the Chase Bank account with
account number ending in 8712, with the memo line "Pis
Make Sure You Pay The Worker Assoon As Possible
Plsfamily Expenses"
In violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(2)(B); Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640
(1946).
COUNTS 5-6
(Concealment Money Laundering)
12. On or about the dates listed below, in the Southern District of Ohio and elsewhere,
the defendant, BENJAMIN ADU ACHEAMPONG, did knowingly conduct and attempt to
conduct a financial transaction affecting interstate and foreign commerce, that is, the transaction
described below, which involved the proceeds of a specified unlawful activity, that is, Mail
Fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 and Wire Fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343,
knowing that the transaction was designed in whole and in part to conceal and disguise the
nature, location, source, ownership, and control of the proceeds of said specified unlawful
activity and while conducting and attempting to conduct such financial transaction knew that
5
Case: 1:23-cr-00120-SJD Doc #: 11 Filed: 12/06/23 Page: 6 of 8 PAGEID #: 45
the property involved in the financial transaction represented the proceeds of some form of
unlawful activity:
Count Date, on or about Transfer
5 7/17/20 Wire Transfer for $20,000 from the Chase Bank Account with
account number ending in O176, with the memo line "The Cars
I Sold"
6 7/17/20 Wire Transfer for $15,000 from the Chase Bank Account with
account number ending in 0176, with the memo line "The Cars
I Sold For You"
In violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(l)(B)(i); Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640
(1946).
COUNT7
(False Statement or Representation to an Agency of the United States)
13. On or about May 12, 2021, in the Southern District of Ohio and elsewhere, the
defendant, BENJAMIN ADU ACHEAMPONG, did willfully and knowingly make a
materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statement and representation in a matter within the
jurisdiction of the executive branch of the government of the United States by falsely stating in
a Small Business Administration (SBA) Payment Protection Program (PPP) loan application,
in sum and substance, that he was self-employed in the delivery business; that his business had
$110,500.00 in gross income in 2020; that his business was in operation on February 15, 2020;
and that the information provided in the application for a PPP loan and in all supporting
documents and forms was true and accurate in all material respects. These statements and
representations were false, because as the defendant, BENJAMIN ADU ACHEAMPONG,
then and there knew, he was not self-employed in the delivery business; his alleged delivery
business did not have $110,500.00 in gross income in 2020; his alleged delivery business was
not in operation on February 15, 2020; and therefore the information provided in the application
for a PPP loan and in all supporting documents and forms was not true and accurate in all
6
Case: 1:23-cr-00120-SJD Doc #: 11 Filed: 12/06/23 Page: 7 of 8 PAGEID #: 46
material respects. These statements and representations were also material in that the false
statements to the SBA caused the SBA to approve the issuance of a $20,833 PPP loan to
BENJAMIN ADU ACHEAMPONG.
In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1001(a)(2) and 2.
FORFEITURE ALLEGATION 1
Upon conviction of any offense set forth in Counts 1 through 2 of this Indictment, the
defendant, BENJAMIN ADU ACHEAMPONG, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 98l(a)(l)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), any property, real or personal, which
constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the violation(s), including but not limited
to a sum of money equal to the amount of proceeds the defendant obtained as a result of the
offense(s).
FORFEITURE ALLEGATION 2
Upon conviction of any offense set forth in Counts 3 through 6 of this Indictment, the
defendant, BENJAMIN ADU ACHEAMPONG, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(l), any property, real or personal, involved in such offense(s), and any
property traceable to such property, including but not limited to a sum of money equal to the
amount of money involved in the offense(s).
SUBSTITUTE ASSETS
If any of the property described above, as a result of any act or omission of the
defendant:
a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;
b. has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party;
c. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court;
7
Case: 1:23-cr-00120-SJD Doc #: 11 Filed: 12/06/23 Page: 8 of 8 PAGEID #: 47
d. has been substantially diminished in value; or
e. has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided
without difficulty,
it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), as incorporated by 18 U.S.C.
§ 982(b)(l) or 28 U.S.C. § 246l(c), to seek forfeiture of any other property of the defendant,
up to the value of the property described above.
A TRUE BILL.
FOREPERSON
I S'/
KENNETH L. PARKER
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
~liR ()_ c ~6A
JULIE D. GARCIA
Assistant United States Attorney
8
File and source
- File
- 11-indictment-as-to-benjamin-adu-acheampong-1-entry-doc1-id-fro.pdf
- Size
- 2,690,806 bytes
- SHA-256
- 1372e2b315fc7a24fd2562693b902694e5b143d32a503c6e4a90988f55b1a4e3
- Original
- No public link identified.