Judgment, Jordan Powell v. United States Small Business Administration
Summary
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit entered this judgment on July 25, 2025, in No. 25-5043, an appeal by Jordan Powell with JBG Smith Properties, LP First Residences and the United States Small Business Administration as appellees. The panel of Katsas, Rao, and Walker, Circuit Judges, affirmed the district court's December 5, 2024 order remanding the case to the District of Columbia Superior Court. The judgment states that the appellant showed no error in the conclusion that he failed to demonstrate that he is unable to enforce his rights in the Superior Court. The disposition will not be published, and the Clerk was directed to withhold the mandate until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Judgment, Jordan Powell v. United States Small Business Administration.”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/10-1-usca-judgment-7-25-2025-attachment-1-to-mandate-of-usca-usca-fdca2547cb/
, SHA-256 3cf5e93bad2d7a3ac473bcef53e877836723f0295ff674ed78cc0b9a790dec8b.Full text
Case 1:24-cv-03215-UNA Document 10-1 Filed 09/16/25 Page 1 of 2
USCA Case #25-5043 Document #2127277 Filed: 07/25/2025 Page 1 of 2
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
____________
No. 25-5043 September Term, 2024
1:24-cv-03215-UNA
Filed On: July 25, 2025
JBG Smith Properties, LP First Residences,
Appellee
v.
Jordan Powell,
Appellant
v.
United States Small Business Administration,
Appellee
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
BEFORE: Katsas, Rao, and Walker, Circuit Judges
JUDGMENT
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court
for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.
34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s December 5, 2024 order
remanding this case to the District of Columbia Superior Court be affirmed. Appellant
has shown no error in the district court’s conclusion that he failed to demonstrate that
he is unable to enforce his rights in this case in the Superior Court. See Johnson v.
Mississippi, 421 U.S. 213, 219 (1975).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk
is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution
Case 1:24-cv-03215-UNA Document 10-1 Filed 09/16/25 Page 2 of 2
USCA Case #25-5043 Document #2127277 Filed: 07/25/2025 Page 2 of 2
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
____________
No. 25-5043 September Term, 2024
of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.
P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT:
Clifton B. Cislak, Clerk
BY: /s/
Daniel J. Reidy
Deputy Clerk
Page 2
File and source
- File
- 10-1-usca-judgment-7-25-2025-attachment-1-to-mandate-of-usca-usca.pdf
- Size
- 63,046 bytes
- SHA-256
- 3cf5e93bad2d7a3ac473bcef53e877836723f0295ff674ed78cc0b9a790dec8b
- Original
- No public link identified.