Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Information — United States v. Yani Stancioff (District of Maine)

Information — United States v. Yani Stancioff (District of Maine)

Summary

A criminal information filed December 3, 2024 in United States v. Yani Stancioff, Case 2:24-cr-00138-LEW, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maine. It alleges that from about June 23, 2020 to about September 10, 2021 Stancioff caused false EIDL advance and PPP applications to be submitted, claiming an agriculture business and gross income from a sole proprietorship, and later false loan forgiveness applications. The information lists an EIDL advance of $10,000 and PPP applications of $20,833 on April 18, 2021 and May 28, 2021, and states Stancioff received approximately $51,666. Count One charges wire fraud under Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2, and the forfeiture notice seeks a money judgment in the amount of the proceeds.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Information — United States v. Yani Stancioff (District of Maine).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/1-information-as-to-yani-stancioff-1-count-s-1-clp-modified-on-10a982aebf/, SHA-256 b0f1d7c87d446fe51a582a153646766d48422d94e9a1331d2b90f68e7ccc5bc2.

Full text

Case 2:24-cr-00138-LEW         Document 1     Filed 12/03/24    Page 1 of 7   PageID #: 1




                         UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                              DISTRICT OF MAINE

   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

              v.                                   No. 2:24-

   YANI STANCIOFF

                                     INFORMATION

         The United States Attorney charges:

                                  General Allegations

         At times relevant to this Information:

         1.        The defendant resided in Portland, Maine, in the District of Maine.

         2.        The Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) was a COVID-19

  pandemic relief program administered by the Small Business Administration

  (“SBA”) that provided forgivable loans to small businesses for job retention and

  certain other expenses. The PPP permitted participating third-party lenders to

  approve and disburse SBA-backed PPP loans to cover payroll, fixed debts,

  utilities, rent/mortgage, accounts payable and other bills incurred by qualifying

  businesses during, and resulting from, the COVID-19 pandemic. PPP loans were

  fully guaranteed by the SBA.

         3.        To obtain a PPP loan, a qualifying business had to submit a PPP

  loan application, which was signed by an authorized representative of the

  business. The PPP loan application required the business (through its authorized

  representative) to acknowledge the program rules and make certain affirmative

  certifications to be eligible to obtain the PPP loan, including that the business was

  in operation and either had employees for whom it paid salaries and payroll taxes
Case 2:24-cr-00138-LEW      Document 1      Filed 12/03/24    Page 2 of 7    PageID #: 2




  or paid independent contractors. A business applying for a PPP loan was required

  to provide documentation showing its payroll expenses.

         4.     The proceeds of a PPP loan could be used for certain specified

  items, such as payroll costs, costs related to the continuation of group health care

  benefits, or mortgage interest payments. The proceeds of a PPP loan were not

  permitted to be used by the borrowers to pay personal expenses unrelated to the

  specified authorized expenses.

         5.     The Economic Injury Disaster Loan (“EIDL”) program was an SBA

  program providing low-interest financing to small businesses, renters, and

  homeowners affected by declared disasters. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and

  Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) authorized the SBA to provide EIDLs of up

  to $2 million to eligible small businesses experiencing substantial financial

  disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, the CARES Act and

  subsequent legislation authorized the SBA to issue advances of up to $10,000 to

  small businesses within three days of applying for an EIDL.

         6.     In order to obtain an EIDL and advance, a qualifying business was

  required to submit an application to the SBA and provide information about its

  operations, such as the number of employees, gross revenue for the 12-month

  period preceding the disaster, and cost of goods sold in the 12-month period

  preceding the disaster. In the case of EIDLs for COVID-19 relief, the 12-month

  period was the period preceding January 31, 2020. For a business to be eligible

  for an EIDL, the business must have been in operation before February 1, 2020.

                                           2
Case 2:24-cr-00138-LEW      Document 1      Filed 12/03/24     Page 3 of 7     PageID #: 3




  The applicant was also required to certify that all of the information in the

  application was true and correct to the best of the applicant’s knowledge.

         7.     All EIDL applications were submitted online. Upon approval of an

  application for an EIDL or advance, SBA would disburse the funds.

                               The Scheme and Artifice

         8.     Beginning on about June 23, 2020, and continuing to about

  September 10, 2021, in the District of Maine and elsewhere, the Defendant,

                                 YANI STANCIOFF,

  knowingly and willfully devised and intended to devise a scheme and artifice to

  defraud, and to obtain money and property by means of materially false and

  fraudulent pretense, representations and promises.

                                 Manner and Means

         9.     The manner and means by which the defendant sought to

  accomplish the scheme and artifice included, among others, the following:

                 a. The defendant caused to be prepared and submitted PPP loan

                    applications and an EIDL advance application that included

                    materially false and fraudulent representations and pretenses,

                    such as:

                        i. False statements on an EIDL advance application that

                            the defendant owned a business in the agriculture

                            industry and that the supposed business employed 12

                                           3
Case 2:24-cr-00138-LEW    Document 1        Filed 12/03/24    Page 4 of 7   PageID #: 4




                          people;

                      ii. False statements on an EIDL advance application about

                          his supposed business’s gross revenue;

                     iii. False statements on the PPP application about the

                          defendant’s gross income from a supposed sole

                          proprietorship;

                     iv. False statements that the PPP loan proceeds were

                          necessary to support payroll and other specified items

                          approved under the PPP;

                      v. Affirming under penalty of perjury that the statements

                          in the applications were true and correct.

               b. The defendant caused to be prepared and submitted false and

                   fraudulent IRS documents in support of the PPP applications;

               c. The defendant caused to be prepared and submitted false loan

                   forgiveness applications for his PPP loans.

        10.   As part of the scheme, the defendant caused to be filed the following

  EIDL and PPP loan applications:

              APPROXIMATE           APPLICATION       APPROXIMATE
                  DATE                 TYPE            APPLICATION
                                                         AMOUNT
               June 23, 2020           EIDL               $10,000
                                     ADVANCE
                April 18, 2021         PPP                   $20,833

                                         4
Case 2:24-cr-00138-LEW        Document 1    Filed 12/03/24    Page 5 of 7      PageID #: 5




                   May 28, 2021            PPP               $20,833



        11.      Stancioff received approximately $51,666 as a result of the above

  referenced applications. The funds were deposited electronically into bank

  accounts Stancioff controlled.

                                    COUNT ONE
                                    Wire Fraud

        12.      Paragraphs 1 – 11 and all subparts are incorporated herein.

        13.      On about the dates specified below, in the District of Maine and

  elsewhere, the defendant,

                                   YANI STANCIOFF

  having devised and intending to devise a scheme to defraud, and to obtain money

  and property by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses,

  representations, and promises, did transmit and cause to be transmitted by

  means of wire communications in interstate commerce, writings, signs, signals,

  pictures, and sounds for the purpose of executing the scheme to defraud, as set

  forth below:

       DATE                                    DESCRIPTION

   June 29, 2020      Electronic fund transfer of $10,000 from the SBA into a bank
                      account held by Yani Stancioff.
   May 5, 2021        Electronic fund transfer of $20,833 of PPP funds into a bank
                      account controlled by Yani Stancioff.
   June 25, 2021      Electronic fund transfer of $20,833 of PPP funds into a bank
                      account controlled by Yani Stancioff.



                                           5
Case 2:24-cr-00138-LEW          Document 1     Filed 12/03/24   Page 6 of 7      PageID #: 6




           Thus, the Defendant violated Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343

  and 2.

                                  FORFEITURE NOTICE

           1.      Upon conviction of the offense alleged in Count One of this

  Information, charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, the defendant shall forfeit

  to the United States, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c),

  any property, real or personal, constituting or derived from proceeds traceable to

  the offense and, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(2), any property constituting, or

  derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as the result of the offense.

  The property to be forfeited includes, but is not limited to, a money judgment in

  the amount of those proceeds and property derived from those proceeds.

           2.      If any of the property described in Paragraph 1, above, as being

  forfeitable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), and

  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(2), as a result of any act or omission of the

  defendant—

           a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;

           b. has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party;

           c. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court;

           d. has been substantially diminished in value; or

           e. has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided

                without difficulty;

  it is the intention of the United States, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c) and 18

                                              6
Case 2:24-cr-00138-LEW      Document 1      Filed 12/03/24    Page 7 of 7    PageID #: 7




  U.S.C. § 982(b)(1), incorporating 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), to seek forfeiture of any

  other property of the defendant up to the value of the property described in

  paragraph 1 above.

         All pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C), and

  Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), and Title 18, United States Code,

  Section 982(a)(2).

  Dated this 3rd day of December, 2024, in Portland, Maine.


                                                   Respectfully submitted


                                                   Darcie N. McElwee
                                                   United State Attorney



                                                   _______________
                                                   Sean M. Green
                                                   Assistant United States Attorney




                                           7


File and source

File
1-information-as-to-yani-stancioff-1-count-s-1-clp-modified-on.pdf
Size
102,777 bytes
SHA-256
b0f1d7c87d446fe51a582a153646766d48422d94e9a1331d2b90f68e7ccc5bc2
Our copy
1-information-as-to-yani-stancioff-1-count-s-1-clp-modified-on.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top