Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Complaint to Avoid and Preserve Lien — Keith Lowey, Trustee v. Innovation Refunds (District of Massachusetts)

Complaint to Avoid and Preserve Lien — Keith Lowey, Trustee v. Innovation Refunds (District of Massachusetts)

Summary

A complaint to avoid and preserve lien filed August 25, 2025 by Keith Lowey, as Liquidating Trustee of the CW Keller Liquidating Trust, against Innovation Refunds LLC, Adversary Case 25-01139, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts, in the C.W. Keller & Associates, LLC chapter 11 case, Case No. 23-11357-CJP. The complaint states that the debtor and Innovation Refunds signed a Master Services Agreement on or about July 31, 2023 for referral services on employee retention tax credits, and that a UCC-1 statement was recorded on December 5, 2023, after the August 24, 2023 petition date. Count I seeks a declaratory judgment, Count II avoidance and preservation of the lien under 11 U.S.C. §§ 544 and 551, and Count III avoidance of a preference. Exhibit A is the UCC-1 form.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Complaint to Avoid and Preserve Lien — Keith Lowey, Trustee v. Innovation Refunds (District of Massachusetts).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/1-complaint-lowey-v-innovation-refunds-396104bc0e/, SHA-256 6c7c85b95f863a8fe74c297f28f703b5cd9a788fe4f86a07ec040cac719df3f5.

Full text

  Case 25-01139    Doc 1     Filed 08/25/25 Entered 08/25/25 20:17:34   Desc Main
                                Document    Page 1 of 9



                    UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
                       DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
                             (Eastern Division)


In re                                        Chapter 11
C.W. KELLER & ASSOCIATES, LLC, et            Case No. 23-11357-CJP
al.
                                             (Jointly Administered)
                Debtors,



KEITH LOWEY, in his capacity as
Liquidating Trustee of the CW Keller
Liquidating Trust,

                Plaintiff,
                                             Adv. Proc. No. 25-_____-CJP
        v.

INNOVATION REFUNDS LLC

                Defendant.


                COMPLAINT TO AVOID AND PRESERVE LIEN

   Plaintiff Keith Lowey (the “Trustee”), in his capacity as the duly appointed

Liquidating Trustee of the CW Keller Liquidating Trust (the “Trust”), hereby files

this Complaint (the “Complaint”) against Innovation Refunds LLC to avoid and

preserve for the estate a lien obtained by Defendant and respectfully alleges as

follows:

                                       Parties

        1.   The Trustee has a place of business at 124 Washington Street, Suite

101, Foxboro, Massachusetts 02035.
  Case 25-01139      Doc 1   Filed 08/25/25 Entered 08/25/25 20:17:34     Desc Main
                                Document    Page 2 of 9



       2.     Defendant Innovation Refunds LLC (“Defendant”) is a Delaware

limited liability company with a business address at 4350 Westown Parkway, Suite

300, Des Moines, Iowa 50266.

                               Jurisdiction and Venue

       3.     This Court has jurisdiction over this adversary proceeding, which

relates to the above-captioned pending case, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b), 1334

and L.R., D. Mass. 201.

       4.     Venue is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1409(a).

       5.     This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b).

       6.     This Court has jurisdiction over the Defendant pursuant to Rule

7004(f) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and by virtue of Defendant

filing a proof of claim.

                                        Facts

       7.     On August 24, 2023 (the “Petition Date”), C.W. Keller & Associates,

LLC (a Massachusetts limited liability company) (the “Debtor”) and C.W. Keller

Holding Company, Inc. (a Massachusetts corporation) (“Holding,” and together, the

“Debtors”) each filed a voluntary petition under chapter 11 of 11 U.S.C. § 101, et

seq. (“Bankruptcy Code”), commencing the above-captioned bankruptcy case (the

“Bankruptcy Case”).

       8.     On January 5, 2024, the Debtors filed the Second Amended Chapter 11

Plan of Liquidation (the “Plan”), which provided for the creation of a Liquidating

Trust for the purpose of liquidating and distributing the Debtors’ assets.




                                           2
  Case 25-01139      Doc 1   Filed 08/25/25 Entered 08/25/25 20:17:34    Desc Main
                                Document    Page 3 of 9



      9.     On February 20, 2024, the Court entered an order confirming the Plan

(the “Confirmation Order”). Pursuant to the Confirmation Order, the Court

appointed the Trustee as trustee of the Liquidating Trust.

      10.    Section 5.15 of the Plan vests the Liquidating Trustee with all rights,

powers and benefits afforded to a “trustee” under the Bankruptcy Code. Section 5.30

of the Plan confers on the Trustee the right to commence and prosecute Avoidance

Actions (as defined in the Plan) pursuant to Sections 544, 547, 548, 550 and 551 of

the Bankruptcy Code.

      11.    On or about July 31, 2023, the C.W. Keller & Associates, Inc. and

Defendant executed that certain Master Services Agreement (the “MSA”), pursuant

to which Defendant, agreed to provide certain referral services as part of the

pursuit of employee retention tax credits (“ERC”).

      12.    In exchange for such services, C.W. Keller & Associates, Inc. agreed to

pay Defendant a contingent fee upon the occurrence of certain events (the

“Contingent Fee”).

      13.    Pursuant to Section 7 of the MSA, C.W. Keller & Associates, Inc.

granted Defendant a lien in certain collateral to secure payment of the Contingent

Fee, and permission to file one or more UCC-1 financing statements or other

documents to perfect is security interest in such collateral.

      14.    Defendant, however, did not record a UCC-1 financing statement with

the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts until December 5, 2023—

months after the Petition Date and in violation of the automatic stay, including 11




                                           3
  Case 25-01139     Doc 1   Filed 08/25/25 Entered 08/25/25 20:17:34      Desc Main
                               Document    Page 4 of 9



U.S.C. § 362(a)(4) and (5). A copy of Defendant’s UCC-1 statement filed against the

Debtor (the “Defendant’s Financing Statement”) is attached as Exhibit A.

                                    COUNT I
                             DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

      15.    The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations of the foregoing

paragraphs with the same force and effect as though fully set forth herein.

      16.    A controversy exists concerning the perfection, validity, and amount of

Defendant’s lien.

      17.    The Trustee requests a declaration that the recording of Defendant's

Financing Statement on December 5, 2023 violated the automatic stay and failed to

perfect its security interest in any property of the Debtor for the estate, and that

Defendant's Financing Statement is void.

                                  COUNT II
                    AVOIDANCE AND PRESERVATION OF LIEN
                           11 U.S.C. §§ 544 and 551

      18.    The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations of the foregoing

paragraphs with the same force and effect as though fully set forth herein.

      19.    Section 544 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that a trustee shall have

the right and power, as of the commencement of the case, and without regard to any

knowledge of the trustee or of any creditor, to avoid any transfer of property of a

debtor of any obligation incurred by the debtor that is avoidable by a judicial lien

creditor.




                                           4
  Case 25-01139     Doc 1   Filed 08/25/25 Entered 08/25/25 20:17:34      Desc Main
                               Document    Page 5 of 9


      20.    Property of the Debtor was transferred to Defendant when the

Defendant's Financing Statement was recorded with the Secretary of the

Commonwealth.

      21.    Defendant’s lien was not properly perfected and is avoidable pursuant

to Section 544 of the Bankruptcy Code.

      22.    Section 551 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that any lien that is

avoided is preserved for the benefit of the bankruptcy estate.

      23.    To the extent that Defendant's lien is avoided, the Trustee is entitled

to preservation of the voided lien for the benefit of the bankruptcy estate.


                                 COUNT III
                 AVOIDANCE AND RECOVERY OF PREFERENCE
                        11 U.S.C. §§ 547, 550 and 551

      24.    The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations of the foregoing

paragraphs with the same force and effect as though fully set forth herein.

      25.    The transfer of the security interest to Defendant pursuant to the MSA

was a transfer of an interest of a Debtor in property made to or for the benefit of a

creditor.

      26.    The transfer of the security interest to Defendant pursuant to the MSA

was made on account of an antecedent debt owed by a Debtor before such Transfer

was made.

      27.    The transfer of the security interest to Defendant pursuant to the MSA

was made while the Debtors were insolvent.




                                           5
  Case 25-01139     Doc 1   Filed 08/25/25 Entered 08/25/25 20:17:34     Desc Main
                               Document    Page 6 of 9



      28.    The transfer of the security interest to Defendant pursuant to the MSA

was made on or within ninety (90) days before the filing of the Debtors’ bankruptcy

petitions.

      29.    The transfer of the security interest to Defendant pursuant to the

MSA, if not avoided, would enable the Defendant to receive more than it would

receive if: (i) the Bankruptcy Case were a Chapter 7 case; (ii) the transfer had not

been made; and (iii) the Defendant received payment of such debt to the extent

allowable under the Bankruptcy Code.

      30.    The transfer of the security interest to Defendant pursuant to the MSA

is voidable by the Trustee as a preference pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 547, which the

Trustee may avoid pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § § 550 and 551.

      31.    The Trustee is entitled a judgment against Defendant avoiding the

transfer of the security interest to Defendant pursuant to the MSA pursuant to 11

U.S.C. § 547 and preserving it for the benefit of the Debtors’ bankruptcy estates

pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §551.

                                  Prayer for Relief

      WHEREFORE, the Trustee respectfully requests that this Court enter

judgment in favor of the Trustee as follows:

       1.    Declaring that Defendant’s recording of Defendant’s Financing
             Statement failed to perfect a security interest in any property of the
             Debtor of the estate, and is void;

       2.    Determining that Defendant’s Financing Statement and lien were not
             properly perfected and are avoidable, and ordering that each such
             transfer be avoided and the position preserved for the Trustee for the
             benefit of the estate pursuant to Sections 544 and 551 of the
             Bankruptcy Code;


                                          6
Case 25-01139   Doc 1   Filed 08/25/25 Entered 08/25/25 20:17:34    Desc Main
                           Document    Page 7 of 9



    3.   Avoiding, setting aside and preserving for the benefit of the estate the
         transfer of the security interest pursuant to Sections 547, 550, and 551
         of the Bankruptcy Code;

    4.   Awarding costs and legal fees; and

    5.   Granting the Trustee such other and further relief as is just and
         proper.



                                     KEITH LOWEY, LIQUIDATING
                                     TRUSTEE


                                     By his attorneys,


                                     /s/ Joseph M. Downes III
                                     Joseph M. Downes III (BBO No. 655853)
                                     William S. McMahon (BBO No. 651832)
                                     Downes McMahon LLP
                                     215 Lewis Wharf
                                     Boston, MA 02110
                                     Telephone: (617) 600-6430
                                     Facsimile: (617) 848-3781
                                     jdownes@dmlawllp.com
                                     wmcmahon@dmlawllp.com




                                      7
Case 25-01139   Doc 1   Filed 08/25/25 Entered 08/25/25 20:17:34   Desc Main
                           Document    Page 8 of 9




                         EXHIBIT A
               Case 25-01139 Doc 1 Filed 08/25/25 Entered 08/25/25 20:17:34 Desc Main
                                       Document
              MA SOC Filing Number: 202305987310  Page
                                                  Date:9 of 9
                                                        12/5/2023 5:28:00 PM




                                                  UCC-1 Form
FILER INFORMATION
          Full name: ELIDAH WANJIRU
   Email Contact at Filer: FULFILLMENT@MIDDESK.COM
SEND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO
             Contact name: MIDDESK, INC.
           Mailing Address: 85 2 ND S TREET S UITE 710
     City, State Zip Country: S AN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 USA


DEBTOR INFORMATION
          Org. Name: C.W. KELLER & ASSOCIATES, LLC
           Mailing Address: 9 HALE S PRING RD
     City, State Zip Country: PLAISTOW, NH 03865-2313 USA

SECURED PARTY INFORMATION
          Org. Name: INNOVATION R EFUNDS
           Mailing Address: 4350 W ESTOWN PKWY 8 300
     City, State Zip Country: WEST DES MOINES, IA 50266 USA

TRANSACTION TYPE: STANDARD

CUSTOMER REFERENCE: C1024064

COLLATERAL
ALL RIGHT, TITLE, INTEREST, CLAIMS AND DEMANDS OF DEBTOR IN AND TO THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY: (A) ALL ERC CLAIMS
(AS DEFINED BELOW); AND (B) ALL PROCEEDS AND COLLECTIONS WITH RESPECT TO ALL ERC CLAIMS (AS DEFINED BELOW) AND
ALL RECORDS AND DATA RELATING THERETO. AS USED HEREIN, (I) "ERC CLAIMS" MEANS AND INCLUDES ANY AND ALL CLAIMS
AND/OR REQUESTS FOR ERCS TO THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE AND/OR ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AND/OR QUASI-
GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY; AND (II) "ERCS" MEANS EMPLOYEE RETENTION TAX CREDITS MADE AVAILABLE TO EMPLOYERS
UNDER THE CORONAVIRUS AID, RELIEF, AND ECONOMIC SECURITY ACT (CARES ACT), AS MODIFIED.


File and source

File
1-complaint-lowey-v-innovation-refunds.pdf
Size
236,062 bytes
SHA-256
6c7c85b95f863a8fe74c297f28f703b5cd9a788fe4f86a07ec040cac719df3f5
Our copy
1-complaint-lowey-v-innovation-refunds.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top