Complaint for Forfeiture — United States v. $10,000.00 in United States Currency (District of Colorado)
Summary
A verified forfeiture complaint in rem filed August 10, 2026, by the United States against $10,000.00 in United States currency seized from a J.P. Morgan Chase account, Case No. 1:26-cv-03624-PAB-NRN, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado. It states that the funds were deposited on or about June 24, 2020, that JPMC confirmed them as EIDG funds, and that the United States Postal Inspection Service seized them on March 10, 2026. It describes a $20,832 PPP loan executed with Cecilia Bryant and a claim contesting the forfeiture received May 11, 2026. It seeks forfeiture under 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(a)(1)(C) and 984 for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 641 and 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Special Agent Gabriel Cazares of the United States Secret Service verifies the facts; Kurt J. Bohn signs for the government.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Complaint for Forfeiture — United States v. $10,000.00 in United States Currency (District of Colorado).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/1-complaint-a8b8e51f6b/
, SHA-256 9fa1413412a050e2148b598507e70289d27ed9d83fc43155c1217620b4505321.Full text
Case No. 1:26-cv-03624-PAB-NRN Document 1 filed 08/10/26 USDC Colorado pg
1 of 7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
1. $10,000.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM J.P. MORGAN
CHASE BANK ACCOUNT #359920250,
Defendant.
VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM
The United States of America, by and through United States Attorney Peter
McNeilly and Assistant United States Attorney Kurt J. Bohn, pursuant to Supplemental
Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions G(2), states:
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. The United States of America (the United States) has commenced this
action pursuant to the civil forfeiture provisions of 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(a)(1)(C) and 984,
seeking forfeiture of defendant property based on violations of 18 U.S.C. § 641 (theft of
public funds), and 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (wire fraud). This Court has jurisdiction under 28
U.S.C. §§ 1345 and 1355.
2. Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1395, as some of the acts described
herein occurred in the District of Colorado.
1
Case No. 1:26-cv-03624-PAB-NRN Document 1 filed 08/10/26 USDC Colorado pg
2 of 7
DEFENDANT PROPERTY
3. Defendant property is more fully described as: $10,000.00 in United
States currency seized from J.P. Morgan Chase (JPMC) account #359920250
(“defendant $10,000.00”), seized on March 10, 2026. The account was in the name of
“Cecilia D Bryant.” Defendant $10,000.00 is currently in the custody of the United
States Postal Inspection Service.
FACTUAL BASIS FOR FORFEITURE
4. Except as otherwise noted, all the following facts and information have
been discovered through my own investigation and the observations and investigations
of fellow law enforcement officers as reported to me.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
5. On March 27, 2020, the President of the United States signed into law the
Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, which provided
emergency assistance, administered by the Small Business Association (SBA), to small
business owners suffering adverse economic effects caused by the Coronavirus
(COVID-19) pandemic. The CARES Act established several new temporary programs
and expanded existing programs, including programs created or administered by the
SBA. Two sources of funding for small businesses were the Paycheck Protection
Program (PPP) and the Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) program. In addition, the
CARES act authorized the SBA to issue advances, known as Economic Injury Disaster
Grants (EIDG), of up to $10,000 to small businesses. The amount of the EIDG was
determined by the number of employees listed on the EIDL application, and the EIDGs
did not need to be repaid.
2
Case No. 1:26-cv-03624-PAB-NRN Document 1 filed 08/10/26 USDC Colorado pg
3 of 7
6. In order to obtain an EIDL and/or EIDG, a qualifying business was
required to submit an application to the SBA and provide information about its
operations, including the business’s gross business revenues and cost of goods sold in
the twelve months prior to January 31, 2020. The amount of the loan, if approved, was
determined based on the information provided concerning the gross revenue and cost
of goods sold.
7. JPMC began to identify PPP funds deposited into numerous bank
accounts after April 1, 2020, that it suspected constituted proceeds of PPP fraud. After
identifying the accounts, JPMC froze the account funds and maintained them as likely
proceeds of PPP fraud activity.
8. On March 5, 2021, SBA began allowing sole proprietors and independent
contractors to calculate their PPP loan using their gross income amount instead of the
net profit on their tax form Schedule C. The maximum loan amount for a sole proprietor
with no employees was $20,833 (the PPP program has a cap of $100,000 on the gross
income or net profit amount: $100,000 / 12 then multiplied by 2.5 = $20,833).
Ms. Bryant’s PPP SBA Loan
9. On April 17, 2021, Ms. Bryant completed and signed a W-9 Form
(Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification) that was required by
SBA to be considered for a loan. It was found that Ms. Bryant had filed two different
Schedule C Forms in 2019. On the first Schedule C, Ms. Bryant states that she has an
“Exam Preparation & Tutoring” business with Gross Income of $99,996, Total Expenses
of $99,996, and with a Net Profit of $99,996. On the second Schedule C, Ms. Bryant
states that she has a “Caterers” business with Gross Income of $99,996, Total
3
Case No. 1:26-cv-03624-PAB-NRN Document 1 filed 08/10/26 USDC Colorado pg
4 of 7
Expenses of $99,996, and with a Net Profit of $99,996, the same exact figures used on
the first Schedule C.
10. On April 17, 2021, Capital Plus Financial, LLC executed a PPP SBA Loan
with an individual by the name of Cecilia Bryant for $20,832.
Defendant $10,000.00 Seized from J.P. Morgan Chase Account #0250
11. On March 10, 2026, defendant $10,000.00 was seized from JPMC
account #0250 by the United States Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) pursuant to a
federal seizure warrant.
12. On May 11, 2026, the USPIS received an administrative claim from Cecilia
A. Bryant, contesting the administrative forfeiture of the defendant funds. In email
correspondence with Ms. Bryant, she states that there is a “significant misunderstanding
regarding the origin of these funds.” Ms. Bryant goes on to say that, “The $10,000
deposit was not related to an SBA loan or any SBA funding,” and “I am very confused
as to why the SBA has been referenced throughout this matter, as this situation has
never involved an SBA loan, a sole proprietorship, or any business-related funding.”
13. Ms. Bryant provided copies of payments to her from “Our Florida” for
“Tidal Basin Government Consulting LLC” and “IH4 Property Florida LP,” that were
dated May 7, 2022, matching the balance but for the wrong year and there is no SBA
documentation.
14. Deposit of defendant $10,000.00 was received by JPMC account #0250
on or about June 24, 2020. JPMC confirms that defendant $10,000.00 was EIDG funds.
4
Case No. 1:26-cv-03624-PAB-NRN Document 1 filed 08/10/26 USDC Colorado pg
5 of 7
15. Between on or about April 1, 2020 and May 4, 2022, JPMC identified and
froze SBA funds deposited into numerous accounts, defendant $10,000.00 was one of
those accounts, as it was suspected to constitute proceeds of fraud.
CONCLUSION
In summary, there is reasonable cause to believe that defendant $10,000.00
constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to violations of 18 U.S.C. § 641 (theft
of public funds), and 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (wire fraud). Therefore, defendant $10,000.00 is
subject to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(a)(1)(C) and 984.
VERIFICATION OF GABRIEL CAZARES, SPECIAL AGENT,
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE
I, Special Agent Gabriel Cazares, hereby state and aver under the pains and
perjury that I have read the foregoing Factual Basis for Forfeiture and that the facts and
information contained therein are true.
s/ Gabriel Cazares___
Gabriel Cazares
Special Agent
United States Secret Service
5
Case No. 1:26-cv-03624-PAB-NRN Document 1 filed 08/10/26 USDC Colorado pg
6 of 7
FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
1. The Plaintiff repeats and incorporates by reference the paragraphs above.
2. By the foregoing and other acts, $10,000.00 seized from J.P. Morgan
Chase account number 359920250 constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to
violations of 18 U.S.C. § 641 (theft of public funds). Therefore, defendant $10,000.00 is
forfeitable to the United States pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(a)(1)(C) and 984.
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
3. The Plaintiff repeats and incorporates by reference the paragraphs above.
4. By the foregoing and other acts, $10,000.00 seized from J.P. Morgan
Chase account number 359920250 constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to
violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (wire fraud). Therefore, defendant $10,000.00 is
forfeitable to the United States pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(a)(1)(C) and 984.
WHEREFORE, the United States prays for entry of a final order of forfeiture for
the defendant property in favor of the United States, that the United States be
authorized to dispose of the defendant property in accordance with law, and that the
Court enter a finding of probable cause for the seizure of the defendant property and
issue a Certificate of Reasonable Cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465.
DATED this 10th day of August 2026.
///
///
///
6
Case No. 1:26-cv-03624-PAB-NRN Document 1 filed 08/10/26 USDC Colorado pg
7 of 7
Respectfully submitted,
PETER MCNEILLY
United States Attorney
By: s/ Kurt J. Bohn_ __
Kurt J. Bohn
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
1801 California Street, Suite 1600
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone: 303-454-0100
Fax: 303-454-0405
Email: tonya.andrews@usdoj.gov
7
File and source
- File
- 1-complaint.pdf
- Size
- 179,440 bytes
- SHA-256
- 9fa1413412a050e2148b598507e70289d27ed9d83fc43155c1217620b4505321
- Our copy
- 1-complaint.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.