Order Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure — United States v. Bushell, Stockton
Summary
Order Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Doc. 11, dated October 13, 2022, in United States of America v. Brian Andrew Bushell and Tracey M.A. Stockton, No. 22-mj-04506-DHH, in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Citing the Due Process Protections Act and Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the order reminds the United States of its obligation to disclose in a timely manner all exculpatory evidence to the defendants, as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). It states that failure to comply may result in consequences, including exclusion of evidence, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, and sanctions. The signature reads / s / Jennifer C. Boal, United States Magistrate Judge.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure — United States v. Bushell, Stockton.”
Original at storage.courtlistener.com. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/007-ecf-11-gov-uscourts-mad-249171-11-0-6f1b117a5f/
, SHA-256 677847ff5fe15d9dfea3114e225a8169d2bc6384454d397e8e9ce6abc28f868b.Full text
Case 1:22-mj-04506-DHH Document 11 Filed 10/13/22 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
No. 22-mj-04506-DHH
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
BRIAN ANDREW BUSHELL and TRACEY M.A. STOCKTON
ORDER PURSUANT TO
RULE 5 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
October 13, 2022
Boal, U.S.M.J.
Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, Pub. L. No. 116-182, 134 Stat. 894 (Oct. 21,
2020) and Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States is reminded of
its obligation to disclose in a timely manner all exculpatory evidence to the defendants, that is,
all evidence that is favorable to the defendants or tends to cast doubt on the United States’ case,
as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny. Failure to comply with
this order may result in consequences, including, but not limited to, the reversal of any
conviction, the exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt
proceedings, disciplinary action, and/or sanctions by the Court.
/ s / Jennifer C. Boal
JENNIFER C. BOAL
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1File and source
- File
- 007_ECF_11_gov.uscourts.mad.249171.11.0.pdf
- Size
- 124,397 bytes
- SHA-256
- 677847ff5fe15d9dfea3114e225a8169d2bc6384454d397e8e9ce6abc28f868b
- Original
- storage.courtlistener.com