Court filing
Preliminary Order of Forfeiture — United States of America v. Kurt Sieu Ly, No. 1:26-cr-00016-TSK-MJA (Dkt. 42, N.D. W. Va.)
Summary
Preliminary Order of Forfeiture in United States of America v. Kurt Sieu Ly, Criminal No. 1:26-CR-00016, in the Northern District of West Virginia, Document 42, dated August 14, 2026. It orders the defendant, who has pled guilty to violating Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343, to forfeit proceeds in the amount of $197,766.00. It states that the defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Indictment during the Rule 11 hearing on July 27, 2026. It states that the Order becomes final regarding the defendant at the time of sentencing and will be made part of the sentence by reference in the judgment. The signature block names Chief Judge Thomas S. Kleeh.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2026-08-14 |
Cite this document
“Preliminary Order of Forfeiture — United States of America v. Kurt Sieu Ly, No. 1:26-cr-00016-TSK-MJA (Dkt. 42, N.D. W. Va.).”
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, No. 1:26-cr-00016, Doc. 42, filed 2026-08-14. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/wvnd-1-26-cr-00016/2026-08-14-preliminary-order-of-forfeiture/
, SHA-256 1e71a4f091571c7c2bb959a9871823fa08698e33da2e0c37a9aa1784741de23a.Full text
Case 1:26-cr-00016-TSK-MJA Document 42 Filed 08/14/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
100
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v. Criminal No. 1:26-CR-00016
KURT SIEU LY,
Defendant.
PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE
Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 981(a)(1)(C), 1956(c)(7)(A), 1961(1),
and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), the Court having made the findings of fact and
conclusions of law enumerated below, it is hereby ORDERED that defendant, who has pled guilty
to violating Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343, forfeit to the United States the following
property, which is directly subject to forfeiture:
x Proceeds in the amount of $197,766.00 [CATS ID: 26-TOI-000001].
1. On March 3, 2026, the grand jury returned an Indictment alleging that the defendant
violated Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343. The Forfeiture Allegation in the Indictment
contains notice to the defendant that the government intends to forfeit property in this criminal
case.
2. Title 18, United States Code, Sections 981(a)(1)(C), 1956(c)(7)(A), 1961(1), and
Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c) mandate forfeiture of any property constituting, or
derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly, as a result of a violation of Title 18, United
States Code, Section 1343.
3. On July 27, 2026, during the Rule 11 hearing, the defendant pled guilty to Count
One of the Indictment, alleging the defendant violated Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343.
Case 1:26-cr-00016-TSK-MJA Document 42 Filed 08/14/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
101
The plea agreement includes the defendant’s stipulation that the amount of proceeds of the offense
conduct underlying the conviction is $197,866.00.1 The defendant further stipulated that substitute
property is subject to forfeiture, because, as a result of the defendant’s acts and omissions, all
property subject to direct forfeiture is unavailable for the reasons described in Title 21, United
States Code, Section 853(p)(1), subparagraphs (A)-(E).
4. The record made during the Rule 11 hearing established that the United States is
entitled to the entry of a judgement ordering the defendant to pay $197,766.00.
5. The Court will not be able to identify before sentencing all property subject to
forfeiture. The United States is authorized under Rule 32.2(b)(3) to conduct discovery under the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to locate additional property that may be forfeited under this
Order. When additional property is located, this Order will be amended under Rules 32.2(b)(2)(C)
and 32.2(e)(1).
6. Any forfeited property that is transferred to a victim by the Attorney General
pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(b)(1) (incorporating Title 21, United States
Code, Section 853(i)(1)) shall be set off against the restitution order included in the judgment and
commitment order.
This Order of Forfeiture shall become final regarding the defendant at the time of
sentencing, and will be made part of the sentence by incorporating this Order by reference in the
judgment. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Order, and to amend it as necessary.
SO ORDERED.
August 14,2026
DATED:_____________________
______________________________
CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS S. KLEEH
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
1
The United States indicated in its Motion that this amount was a typographical error. The correct amount is
$197,766.00.
2
File and source
- File
- 42-preliminary-order-of-forfeiture.pdf
- Size
- 248,047 bytes
- SHA-256
- 1e71a4f091571c7c2bb959a9871823fa08698e33da2e0c37a9aa1784741de23a
- Original
- PACER (login required)