Notice of Appeal — Vitolo v. Guzman

Summary

Plaintiffs' Notice of Appeal in Jake's Bar and Grill, LLC and Antonio Vitolo v. Isabella Casillas Guzman, Case No. 3:21-cv-176, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, dated May 20, 2021. The plaintiffs appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit from the District Court's Order (Dkt. 20) and Memorandum Opinion (Dkt. 24), entered May 17 and May 19, 2021, respectively, denying their Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Dkt. 12) filed on May 12. A footnote states that the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction over interlocutory orders granting, continuing, modifying, refusing or dissolving injunctions. The signature lines are /s/ Luke N. Berg and /s/ Matthew J. McClanahan, with the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty listed.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE 
______________________________________________________________________________ 
 
JAKE’S BAR AND GRILL, LLC, and 
ANTONIO VITOLO, 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Plaintiffs, 
  
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case No. 3:21-cv-176  
 
 
 
 
ISABELLA CASILLAS GUZMAN,  
 
 
 
Defendant. 
______________________________________________________________________________ 
PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF APPEAL  
______________________________________________________________________________ 
 
Plaintiffs, JAKE’S BAR AND GRILL, LLC, and ANTONIO VITOLO, pursuant 
to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1),1 hereby appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for 
the Sixth Circuit from the District Court’s Order (Dkt. 20) and Memorandum Opinion 
(Dkt. 24), entered May 17 and May 19, 2021, respectively, denying Plaintiffs’ Motion 
for Temporary Restraining Order (Dkt. 12) filed on May 12. 
 
Dated May 20, 2021 
 
 
WISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY 
Rick Esenberg 
rick@will-law.org 
 
                                            
1 The Court of Appeals has jurisdiction to hear appeals from “[i]nterlocutory orders of the district 
courts … granting, continuing, modifying, refusing or dissolving injunctions.” 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). 
Due to their short duration, an order granting or denying a TRO is generally not appealable, however 
the Court of Appeals to review a TRO decision that “has the practical effect of an injunction,” or if 
necessary to prevent “serious, perhaps irreparable, consequence[s],” Maryville Baptist Church, Inc. v. 
Beshear, 957 F.3d 610, 612 (6th Cir. 2020) (citation omitted); Ohio Republican Party v. Brunner, 543 
F.3d 357, 360 (6th Cir. 2008); Beacon J. Publ’g Co., Inc. v. Blackwell, 389 F.3d 683, 684 (6th Cir. 2004). 
Case 3:21-cv-00176-TRM-DCP   Document 25   Filed 05/20/21   Page 1 of 3   PageID #: 215

 
2 
 
Daniel P. Lennington 
dan@will-law.org 
/s/ Luke N. Berg 
Luke N. Berg 
luke@will-law.org 
330 E. Kilbourn Ave., Suite 725 
Milwaukee, WI 53202 
Phone: (414) 727-9455  
Fax: (414)727-6385 
 
 
/s/ Matthew J. McClanahan 
Matthew J. McClanahan (BPR #036867) 
McClanahan & Winston, PC 
PO Box 51907 
Knoxville, Tennessee 37950 
Telephone: (865) 347-3921 
Fax: (865) 444-0786 
Email: matt@tennadvocate.com 
 
Attorneys for Plaintiffs 
 
 
 
Case 3:21-cv-00176-TRM-DCP   Document 25   Filed 05/20/21   Page 2 of 3   PageID #: 216

 
3 
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was filed via the 
Court’s ECF system which will effect service upon all counsel or parties of record. 
Dated: May 20, 2021 
/s/ Luke N. Berg 
Luke N. Berg 
Case 3:21-cv-00176-TRM-DCP   Document 25   Filed 05/20/21   Page 3 of 3   PageID #: 217

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.tned.99748.25.0.pdf

Size

91,093 bytes

SHA-256

ce221458a7c2cd6e6400047bc5789b4ca13ff98d1ac37f2ef4bbe05d13657974

Our copy

gov.uscourts.tned.99748.25.0.pdf

Original

No public link identified.