Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Victor Torres case — U.S. District Court, S.D. Ohio Letter (Louis Rubenstein, September 30, 2020) — United States of America v. Victor Torres (Doc 43)

Court filing

Letter (Louis Rubenstein, September 30, 2020) — United States of America v. Victor Torres (Doc 43)

Summary

Discovery request letter dated September 30, 2020 from defense attorney Louis Rubenstein of Cincinnati to Assistant United States Attorney Ebunoluwa A. Taiwo in United States of America v. Victor Torres, filed as Doc 43 in Case 1:20-cr-00087-DRC in the Southern District of Ohio. It asks the government to disclose the defendant's written and oral statements, his criminal record, documents and objects material to the defense or intended for use at trial, and reports of examinations and tests. It also requests notice of expert testimony and other offense evidence under FRE 404(b), Brady and Giglio material, pretrial Jencks Act material and the government's view of the sentencing guidelines that apply.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed September 30, 2020 in No. 1:20-cr-00087; one of 3 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Filed2020-09-30

Cite this document

“Letter (Louis Rubenstein, September 30, 2020) — United States of America v. Victor Torres (Doc 43).” U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, No. 1:20-cr-00087, Doc. 43, filed 2020-09-30. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/us-v-victor-torres/2020-09-30-dkt-43/, SHA-256 805ba666cb546751d9e050273335923cbfdc67c94df0dab7942533faeea582d2.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case: 1:20-cr-00087-DRC Doc #: 43 Filed: 09/30/20 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 246

LOUIS RUBENSTEIN
ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW
125 E. COURT STREET

OF COUNSEL SUITE 1000 LOUIS RUBENSTEIN (1893-1949)
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-1212 TELEPHONE
SCOTT A. RUBENSTEIN (513)24t-7460
JOHN D. MCCLURE FACSIMILE
GARY S, GOLDMAN (513)684-7777
JOHN D. HILL, JR. EMAIL
ROBERT MERKLE, JR. lourubenstein@yahoo.com
September 30, 2020

Ms. Ebunoluwa A. Taiwo
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
221 East Fourth Street, Suite 400
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

Re: United States of America v. Victor Torres
Case No.: 1:20-CR-087

Dear Ms. Taiwo:

I am writing to formally request that you make available to me all materials and
information which the government must disclose pursuant the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure,
Federal Rules of Evidence and case law.

(1) Statements
(a) Defendant’s Written or Recorded Statements [FRCrP 16(a)(1)(B)].

(1) Any relevant written or recorded statement by Defendant within the
possession, custody or control of the government that are known to you, or through
due diligence may become known. (2) Any reference in any written record of any oral
statement made before or after arrest by Defendant to a person known by Defendant
to be a government agent. (3) Defendant’s grand jury testimony relating to the
charged offenses.

(b) Defendant’s Oral Statements [FRCrP 16(a)(1)(A)].

The substance of any oral statements made by Defendant whether before or
after interrogation by any person then known by Defendant to be a government agent
or law enforcement officer that the government intends to use in any manner at trial

Case: 1:20-cr-00087-DRC Doc #: 43 Filed: 09/30/20 Page: 2 of 5 PAGEID #: 247

Ms. Ebunoluwa A. Taiwo
September 30, 2020
Page Two

regardless of whether any written record of the statement exists. In the event the government
intends to use such an oral statement at trial, I request that it be reduced to writing and
produced. This request includes the substance of the Defendant’s response to Miranda
warnings. Additionally, please provide any written record of Defendant’s oral statements.
This includes, but is not limited to, handwritten or rough notes taken by law enforcement
and/or government agents concerning Defendant’s interview(s).

[request that, in responding to this request for Defendant’s oral statements, you ask each law

enforcement agency involved in investigating or prosecuting this case to search its files for
responsive information.

(2)

(c) Defendant’s Prior Record [FRCrP 16(a)(1)(D)}].

A copy of Defendant’s criminal record within the possession, custody or
control of the government, the existence of which is known, or by the exercise of due
diligence may become known to you. This request includes the defendant’s entire
criminal record, including all arrests and offenses regardless of conviction or
severity. It includes all matters that may affect the defendant’s criminal history score
pursuant to U.S.S.G. Chapter 4. ,

Documents, Data and Objects

(a) Material To Preparing A Defense [FRCrP 16(a)(1)(E)Q@)].

Inspection, copying or photographing of documents, data or tangible objects
within the possession, custody or control of the government and are material to the
preparation of the defense. Separately identify any materials the government intends
to use at trial in-chief.

(b) Material Government Intends To Use In-Chief [FRCrP 16(a)(1)(E)Gi)].

Produce or otherwise make available all documents, data and tangible objects,
including tape recordings and transcripts, which the government intends to use as
evidence in-chief. In this regard, produce any index or working exhibit list of items
you intend to introduce at trial. Provide notice of the government’s intention to use
any evidence in-chief discoverable under Rule 16 which the defense may seek to
suppress [FRCrP 12(b)(4)(B)].

Case: 1:20-cr-00087-DRC Doc #: 43 Filed: 09/30/20 Page: 3 of 5 PAGEID #: 248

Ms. Ebunoluwa A. Taiwo
September 30, 2020
Page Three

(c) Obtained From or Belonging To Defendant [FRCrP 16(a)(1)(E)(i11)].

All materials obtained from or belonging to the defendant that are within the
possession, custody or control of the government regardless of how obtained or the
identity of the person who obtained them.

(3) — Reports of Examinations and Tests [FRCrP 16(a)(1)(F)].

Results or reports of physical or mental examinations, and scientific tests or experiments
within the possession, custody or control of the government or by the existence of due diligence may
become known to you, and material to the preparation of the defense or are intended for use by the
government as evidence in chief at trial. In the event the results of any scientific tests were reported
orally to you or to any government official or law enforcement officer, I request that you cause a
written report of the results to be made and produced. In complying with this request, please contact
any law enforcement agency involved in the investigation or prosecution of this case to determine
whether relevant examinations or tests were conducted, and, if so, produce the results or reports.

(4) Expert Witnesses [FRCrP 16(a)(1)(G)]

In the event you intend to offer any expert testimony under the Federal Rules of Evidence
through any witness, including a government agent or employee or law enforcement officer, [request
that you prepare and produce a summary of the witness’ opinion testimony, the grounds or basis for
any such opinion testimony and the qualifications of the expert witness.

(5) Other Offense Evidence [FRE 404(b)]

[request notice of any “other offense” evidence you intend to introduce in your case in-chief.
At the time you identify any “other offense” evidence you intend to offer in rebuttal, please produce
and identify such evidence separately.

(6) Summary Witness or Charts [FRE 1006]

In the event you intend to call a summary witness at trial or present evidence in the form of
a chart, I request production a reasonable time prior to trial of all of the original documents or tape
recordings on which such testimony or chart is based.

(7) — Brady/Giglio Material

Pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150


Case: 1:20-cr-00087-DRC Doc #: 43 Filed: 09/30/20 Page: 4 of 5 PAGEID #: 249

Ms. Ebunoluwa A. Taiwo
September 30, 2020
Page Four

(1972), produce sufficiently in advance of trial any exculpatory evidence material to guilt or
punishment, including impeachment evidence or information. Should you have a question with
regard to whether certain information constitutes Brady/Giglio material, or when it must be
produced, I request that you present the information to the Court, with notice to me, for review in
camera to resolve these issues.

If you believe that any Brady/Giglio material is also Jencks Act material, I request that you
present it to the Court for in camera review and advise me of the general nature of the evidence.

However, I request that you produce prior to trial all Brady/Giglio material that is not covered by the
Jencks Act.

(8) Jencks Act Material

I request pretrial production of Jencks Act material within a reasonable time prior to the day
of a witness’ direct examination.

(9) Sentencing Information

The Sentencing Commission has encouraged prosecutors prior to the entry ofa plea of guilty
to disclose to a defendant the facts and circumstances of the offense and offender characteristics,
then known to the prosecuting attorney, that are relevant to the application of the sentencing
guidelines. U.S.S.G. §6B1.2, p.s. comment. To insure that my client can make an informed and
intelligent decision regarding the possible or probable consequences of pleading guilty or requesting
a trial, I request that you advise me of any facts and circumstances presently known to the
government or reasonably discoverable, that relate to sentencing issues under the sentencing
guidelines, or to calculation of the applicable sentencing guideline range, should my client be
convicted of any one or more of the charges in the indictment.

More specifically, I request that as soon as possible you provide me with the following
information as to this case:

. What guidelines does the government contend are applicable?

° What aggravated offense characteristics, if any, does the government contend are
applicable?

° What adjustments, if any, does the government contend are applicable?

. Upon what grounds, if any, will the government seek a departure from the
guidelines?

. What criminal history category does the government contend is applicable?


Case: 1:20-cr-00087-DRC Doc #: 43 Filed: 09/30/20 Page: 5 of 5 PAGEID #: 250

Ms. Ebunoluwa A. Taiwo
September 30, 2020
Page Five

I am requesting any information that would bear upon computation of the following
sentencing and guideline factors:

. Base offense level

. Specific offense characteristics
. Relevant conduct

° Adjustments or criminal history

Lalso request any guilt-related Brady information that is favorable to my client and material
to the Court’s determination of a sentence under the sentencing guidelines in the event of a plea of
guilty or conviction.

Pursuant to your continuing duty to disclose information, please immediately advise me of
new information as it becomes available. If you have any questions regarding the nature of the
requests contained in this discovery letter, please contact me. Thank you very much for your time
and attention to this matter. Take care, and I look forward to your response.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Louis Rubenstein
Louis Rubenstein

LR/slh

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.ohsd.244835.43.0.pdf
Size
186,669 bytes
SHA-256
805ba666cb546751d9e050273335923cbfdc67c94df0dab7942533faeea582d2
Our copy
gov.uscourts.ohsd.244835.43.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top