Motion to Confirm/or Reduce FRP Payments Per Judges Order — No. 0:22-cr-00131 (Dkt. 68, D. Minn.)

Summary

Tequisha Solomon, writing pro se from FCI Waseca on October 30, 2024, asks the District of Minnesota in Case No. 0:22-cr-00131 to confirm the payment terms of the judgment (document 58): a minimum of $25 quarterly for a non-UNICOR job or 50% of monthly earnings for UNICOR work. The motion says the prison pays non-UNICOR workers 12 cents per hour while the case manager demands more than $25 a month, and at times takes an entire UNICOR check. It argues that only a federal judge, not the Bureau of Prisons, can change the court's order.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

CASE 0:22-cr-00131-ECT-DTS Doc.68 Filed 11/08/24 Page 1of2

et ht ee ee eee ee ee 2 eee eee eer errr rere eee

FROM: 03260180
TO:

SUBJECT: TEQUISHA SOLOMON--- FRP acai i EC E IVE D

DATE: 10/30/2024 05:46:50 PM

% UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NV 08 2024
wae CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
Tequisha Solomon ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA
vs Case Number: 0:22-CR-00131-ECT-DTS(1)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

MOTION TO CONFIRM/OR REDUCE FRP PAYMENTS
PER JUDGES ORDER

Defendant Tequisha Solomon hereby request this Honorable Court to verify document # 58 on this case docket

that the FRP Payments Affirmed by the judge to paid during Federal Incarceration is to be adhered to by all

Federal Correctional Facilities as identified within:

F: Special Instructions regarding the payment of criminal monetary penalties:

“
Line 5: U.S. DISTRICT COURT ST. PAUL

SCANNED

NOV 0g 2024 ~N

Over the period of incarceration, the defendant shall make payments of either quarterly installments of a MINIMUM of

$25 Quarterly if working a NON unicor JOB or a minimum of 50% of monthly earings if working UNICOR.

It is recommended the defendant participate in the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program while incarcerated.

The Federal Bureau of Prisons are taking it upon themselves to try to alter the FINAL schedule f Payments Order of restitution

that was ordered by the sentencing Judge in this case.

The ONLY person that can alter or change a court order is a Federal Judge NOT the Federal Bureau of Prisons or other

Government entities.

The Federal Correctional Institution that defendant is currently incarcerated at pays the inmates (NOT MATTER WHAT JOB
OTHER THEN UNICOR) a sum of 12 cents perhour. In a Quarterly period if working a total of 40 hours per week, there is no
way that an inmate can earn the sum of $25.00 per quarter, yet the case manager demands at will more then $25 per month
which is beyond reach and definitely NOT a part of the FINAL SENTENCING JUDGEMNT in this instant case.

The Judge has also ordered that if an inmate works a UNICOR job the prison i is to take ONLY 50% of the monthly income as a
minimum. However if an inmate works UNICOR, this facility expects the entire check at times to be taken , although inmate has

not missed a payment.

The Federal Bureau of Prisons regulations state that a prisoner can have their fund for FRP payments reconsidered based
upon a 30 day period of incoming income. These Government workers are clearly not for the inmate paying their fair share to
reduce their Restitution to their victims but to instead try to use the FRP against the inmate to put them in refusal to HALT their
FSA credits and other programming efforts which will allow them to return to their families and communities in attempts to find a

rewarding job to pay off the restitution to her victim which is the Federal Government.

Defendant is requesting the Clerk and this Honorable Court to again verify the court order in t he Final sentencing Judgement
which orders the Inmate to pay $25 per quarter minimum based upon earnings from Prison funds and 50% of Prison funds if

works for UNICOR.

A prisoner's family is not ordered to pay their debt to the government, but in essence, when the Prison system takes into

CASE 0:22-cr-00131-ECT-DTS Doc.68 Filed 11/08/24 Page 2of2

account for FRP the funds sent in by family and friends for commissary purposes, this is un-constitutional as well as an attempt
to alter the Judge's FINAL court Order.

RELIEF REQUESTED:

Defendant request that Clerk and this Honorable Court send a copy of the court docket and confirm the monthly restitution/FRP
payment to be as outlined in the Sentencing order as $25.00 per Quarter for NON Unicor Job or 50% of monthly pay if working
for UNICOR

Respectfully Submitted;

Tequisha Solomon
Pro-Se

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Mailed from Waseca FCI on 10-30-2024 to the Federal United States Court and the AUSA.

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.mnd.201677.68.0.pdf

Size

165,508 bytes

SHA-256

de3a8ccb9bbd884a03d5d31b18f19a5323a264c9ec3e42ab620bc347be756132

Our copy

gov.uscourts.mnd.201677.68.0.pdf

Original

archive.org