Criminal complaint and affidavit — United States v. Diamond Blue Smith (S.D. Fla.)

Record facts

U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · No. 1:21-cr-20001-MGC · Doc. 3 · 2020-10-01 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SO UTH ERN D ISTR IC T O F FLO RIDA
Case No. 
20-MJ-03723-EGT
U NITED STATES O F AG
RICA
DIAM OND BLUE SM ITH,
Defendmzt.
/
CRIM INAL COVER SHEET
Did this matter originate froln a m atter pending in the Central Region of the United States
Attomey's Office prior to August 9, 2013 (Mag. Judge Alicia Valle)? 
Yes V No
Did this m atter originate from a m atler pending in the NoMhern Region of the United States
Attorney's Ofrice prior to August 8, 2014 (Mag. Judge Shaniek M aynard)? 
Yes V No
Did this matter originate from a matler pending itz the Central Region of the United States
Atlorney's Office prior to October 3, 2019 (Mag. Judge Jared Strauss)? 
Yes V No
!
E
Respectfully subm itted,
ARIAN A FA JA RDO OR SHAN
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
BY: 
WXW X /:&'U
AIM EE C. JIM ENEZ
ASSISTAN T UN ITED STATES ATTORN EY
District Court No. A5500795
99 N .E. 4th Street
M iami, Florida 33132
Te1: 
305-961-9028
Fax: 
305-530-7976
Email: 
aimee.jimenez@ usdojagov
Case 1:21-cr-20001-MGC   Document 3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020   Page 1 of 22

A() i' 1 ( Rev. ()Sf'0t?1 Crilninîtl Conqllaint
NITED STATES ISTRICT COURT
for the
Southelm 'l;i strict of 17 lorida
United States of A.merica
V-
Diamond Blue Smith,
)
)
) 
Case No.
.. 
20-M J-03723-EGT
)
)
')
CRIM INAL COM PLAINT BY TELEPHONE OR OTH ER RELIABLE ELECTRONIC M EANS
1, the colnplainant in this case, statc that the following is tlaltl to the best of n1y knowledgc and belicf.
On or about the datets) of 
M#y 1)
.z Apqusts-î4, 202..9.---. in the counties ()f Mj#vlpj-.Dp.d.ç :nd
.M.(q.l:r4..- in the
spp-lhçrn --- District of- 
r.ri/r.j4,q .... ... . -.-. 
, thc dcfendantts) violatcd-.
' tion 
tE.?.#è'?-î', lAescrltaion
code sec
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1343 and 2
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1344 and 2
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1349
Wire Fraud
Bank Fraud
Conspiracy/Attempt to Commit W ire Fraud and Bank Fraud
This crilninal cpmplaint is based on these fkcts:
SEE ATTACHED AFFIDAVIT.
V Continued o11 the attached sheet.
/
t'-- 
/4
. ? 
.e,
/ 
f 
.' 
-.'.
? 
' 
J
/ 
...- 
.
/ 
,.'''' 
k
' ;' ?A di , 
.,, 
%hkj. 
,.
41' lkz- 'i-' G az
-....... 
..- -... - --...- ..--...
-
.... . -rë::::::::::L-. . .- - -..... 
,- -'. .--. --.----.--.--..--....,.- -..----.----
(LAtt p1/ Içlil'tl , l '& sig. zlf)? t't,
t 
ID #6335
k.
W q.IF-qII-E. R.pg.ers. J.L Spqcial Agent, IRS-CI
Prillled name r/af/ fitle
Attested to by the Appl icant in accordancc vrith the requirellzent.s of Fed-R-cl-il 
.1 by tel 
ne.
Date: 
- 
. 
. . 
' 
,
.J 
' ii tldl-t?
ll< (r(! -ç .s xllll f,
City and jtatc: 
.- .- .-.-
-E
-  
- ip--G
...,.-T
. prres ,-U
.-..Ss.M-#gi!Jfat#-J<dge .-..--..
kb'-i't ?(,f? ?,t,?,? 3, fz?,f/ tl/llkf
Case 1:21-cr-20001-MGC   Document 3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020   Page 2 of 22

AFFIDAVIT
1, W arren E, Rogers, Jr., being first duly sworn, lzereby depose and state as follows:
INTRODUCTION AND AGENT BACKGROUND
1 make this Affidavit in support of a crim inal complaint charging DIAM OND
BLUE SMITH (GESMITH'' or Irefendanf), with wke fraud, bank fraud, attempt and conspiracy
to commit wire fraud and bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. jj 1343, 1344, 1349, and 2, from
on or about M ay 13, 2020, to at least on or about August 24, 2020, in the Southe!'n District of
Florida, and elsewhere (the çt-farget Offenses'').
2. 
Defendant has participated in a scheme to obtain by fraud millions of dollars in
forgivable loans through the Paycheck Protection Progrnm (tTPP'') and other govemment
programs, conspiring with a person now cooperating with the investigation (KGCHS 25) and others.
Defendant obtained two fraudulent PPP loans for his own companies, Throwbackjerseys.com,
LLC (I'ThroBrbackjerseys.com''), and Blue Star Records, LLC (ûIB1ue Star Records''), with CHS 2
providing falsified doeum ents and subm itting tlle applications on Defendant's behalf in exchange
for a kickback from the loan proceeds. Defendant also conspired to subm it additional fraudulent
PPP loan applications for other companies by reclaziting other confederate loan applicants in order
tö receive kickbacks from those confederates. To inflate the size of these PPP loans, atzd the
con-esponding kickbacks, the eonspirators relied on a variety of false statem ents, including by
submitling falsified bank statements and payroll tax fol-ms. F0r example, the conspirators used
nearly identical versions of the salne fabricated bank statem ents, recycled in the PPP applications
for multiple companies with m inor changes.
'Fhe conspirators in the schem e planned or prepared at least 90 fraudulent
applications, most of which were submitted. Based on the evidence investigators have revimved
Case 1:21-cr-20001-MGC   Document 3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020   Page 3 of 22

to date, CHS 2, Defendant, and their co-conspirators applied for PPP loans that are together worth
more than $24 m illion dollars, with at least approxim ately 42 of those loans approved and funded
for a total of approximately $17.4 million. Certain of those loan recipients then wired a kickback
of val-ying am ounts, often approximately 25% of the ffaudulent loan proceeds, to an account
controlled by CHS 2.
I am a Special Agent with the United States Departm ent of The Treastlry, Intenlal
Revenue Selwice, Criminal lnvestigation (LtlRS-C1'') and have been employed in this capacity since
July 2002. I am presently assigned to the M iami Field Office. M y duties as a Special Agent
include the investigation of p'ossible crilninal violations of the Intmmal Revenue Code (Title 26 of
the United States Code), the Bank Secrecy Act (Title 31 of the United States Code), and the Money
Laundering Stattltes (Title l 8 of the United States Code). I graduated from the Criminal
Investigator Training Prop-am at the Federal Law Enforcelnent Training Center in October 2002
and the Special Agent Investigative Techniques program at the National Crim inal Investigation
Training Academy in Februal'y 2003. In these two programs, I studied a variety of 1aw
enfbrcement tactics and crim inal investigator teclmiques relating to tax and financial climes. Since
becoming an IRS-CI Special Agent, I have personally ilw estigated and assisted in investigations
relating to the lntemal Revenue Laws and financial crimes. Recently, I have been assigced to
work with the U .S. D epm4m ent of Justice and other 1aw enforcem ent pal-tners, including the
Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Small Btlsiness Administration Offiçe of lnspector
General, to investigate possible fraud associated with the stimulus and economic assistance
program s created by the federal government in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The facts in this zkffidavit come from my personal obselwations, my training and
experience, and information obtain/d from other members of 1aw enforcement and from witnesses.
Page 2 of 20
Case 1:21-cr-20001-MGC   Document 3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020   Page 4 of 22

This Affidavit is intended to show m erely that there is sufficient probable cause and does not set
forth a1l of my ltnowledge about this matlenl
PRO BABLE CAUSE
Tlte Pavclteck Proteaion f'r/ertzzzl
The Coronavinis Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (GICARES'') Act is a federal
1aw enacted in or around M arch 2020 and desir ed to provide elnergency financial assistance to
the m illions of Americans who are suffzring the econom ic effects caused by the COVID-19
pandemic. One source of relief provided by the CARES Act was the authorization of up to $349
billion in forgivable loans to small businesses forjob rdention and cel-tain other expenses, through
a program referred to as the PPP. In or around April 2020, Conp-ess atlthorized over $300 billion
in additional PPP funding,
7. 
ln order to obuin a PPP loan, a qualifying business must submit a PPP loan
application, which is signed by an authorized representative of the business, The PPP loan
application requires 1he business (throug,h it.sauthorized representative) to acknowledge the
program rules and m ake cel-tain affilnuative celiitications in order to be eligible to obtain the PPP
loan. In the PPP loan application, the small business (through its autùorized representative) must
state, among other tllings, its: (a) average monthly payroll expenses; and (b) number of employees.
These figures are used to calculate the am ount of money the small business is eligible to receive
under the PPP. In addition, businesses applying for a PPP loan must provide documentation
showing their payroll expenses.
1 
The conduct and charges described in this Affidavit are pm4 of a larger ilw estigation that
is being conducted in this District and elsew here. As a result, not al1 num bered sourees and
anonymous individuals and entities are described in every filing. I have included in this Affidavit
onlythose individuals and entities I have deemed necessary to explain the particular facts set forth
here.
Page 3 of 20
Case 1:21-cr-20001-MGC   Document 3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020   Page 5 of 22

8.
A PPP loan application must be processed by a partieipating lender. lf a PPP loan
application is approved, the participating lender funds the PPP loan using its own m onies, which
are 100% guaranteed by the Small Business Administl-ation (tGSBA''). Data from the application,
including information about the borrower, the total amount of the loan, and the listed number of
employecs, is transmitted by the lender to tlw SBA in the course ef processing the loan..
PPP loan proceeds must be used bythe business on cel-tain permissibie expenses-
payroll costs, interest on m odgages, rent, and utilities. The PPP allows thç interest and prineipal
on the PPP loan to be entirely forgiven if the business spends the loan proceeds on these expense
item s within a designated period of time after receiving the proceeds and uses a certain am ount of
the PPP loan proceeds on payroll expenses.
The Schem e to Obtain Frclz/àzlell/ PPP Loans
On or about May l3, 2020, Phillip J. Augustin CGAugustin'') and CHS 2 worked
together to submit a fraudulent PPP loan application on behalf of a company owned by Augustin.
Augustin submitted a PPP loan of $84,515 to a federally insured bank (hereinaRer tlBalzk 31'),
through a third-pal-ty company processor (hereinafter 'tBank Processor 171).2 Tlz: application
included bank.statements that ttre clear forgeries, and CHS 2 has admitted thétt the applicatioh was
bâsed on documents that he falsified for Augustin, 3
2 
A11 banks referenced in this Affidavit
Corporation.
are insured by the Federal Deposit lnsurance
On June 25, 2020, investigators an-ested CHS 2 and another person now cooperating with
the ilwestigation (tGCHS 317) and executed search wal-rants at their residences. Following his an-est,
CHS 2 chose to cooperate with the investigation in the hope of obtaining favorable consideration
in connection with his pending charges. CH S 2 was interview ed on that day, and has continued to
cooperate with the investigation after obtaining counsel. M ost of his statem ents related herein
have been con'oborated by records obtained from third parties or recovered from his electronic
devices.
Page 4 of 20
Case 1:21-cr-20001-MGC   Document 3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020   Page 6 of 22

Following the success of that initial fraudulent PPP application, Augustin and CHS
2 began to work on obtaining more and larger PPP loans for Augustin's associates and others,
generally for several hundred thousand dollal-s for each loma, up to as much as approximately $1.24
million. Based on the evidence iiw estigators have reviewed so far, CHS 2 and Augustin
collectively coordinated applications for PPP lotms that are together wol'th more than $24 million
dollars. 'I'he evidence also shows many more PPP loans were attempted but rejected by banks or
their pm ners, or were planned and prepared, but not submitled before CHS 2's al-rest. The
evidence suggests that a11 or nearly a11 of those loan applications were fraudulent, including
Defendant's loan applications,
llwestigators have obtained many other PPP loan applications that CHS 2 has
admitted he sublnitted as pa14 of this scheme, based on falsified documents, and have also obtained
draft doqum ents used or intended to be used in tlzose applications or otlzers. 'Fhese applications a11
follow the sam e pattenz of fraud m any with obviously counterfeit February 2020 bank
statements, and a11 with fabricated IRS Fonns 941 (titled, ItEmployer's Quaderly Federal Tax
Retul4l7') with the same indicia of fraud found in Augustin's initial application but generally with
even larger inflated payroll numbers, thus yielding much larger 1oans.4 CHS 2 has explained to
i 
investigators that the figures in the Folnus 941 were the product of a fonuula that allowed him to
start w ith a target loan am ount, and then 'tback into'' the payroll figures on the form . He explained
how he used figures that would produce an average monthly payroll for 2019 that, when multiplied
by 2.5, would yield the requested loan amotlnt. ln tunz, the nulnber of employees reported was
4 
Some loan applications also included voided checks that appear to be falsified, such as a
purported Bmlk 5 check that appears to have been prodtlced on a computer and, as the subject line
reads, ttconverted to PDF,'' rather than a scan of an authentic check.
Page 5 of 20
Case 1:21-cr-20001-MGC   Document 3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020   Page 7 of 22

chosen based on fictional payroll figures, chosen to avoid an average employee salary that m ight
raise suspicion.
CHS 2 has also explained that he tried to use bank statements showing that the
company had a large balance. Because so few companies had such a statement, and likely also
because it was easierthan keepingtrack ef their true statem ents, CHS 2 repeatedly submitted near-
replicas of the sam e falsified bank statements. ln particular, CHS 2 appears to have recycled one
statement each from Balzk 1, Bnnk 6, and Bank 7. ln recycling a statement, CHS 2 generally
changed only the account number and the accotmt holder's name and address, such that each
version of the statelnent had identical figures and line itelns throughout the stateluent.
A review of records for ballk accounts controlled by CH S 2 at Ballk 5 confirm CHS
2's adm issions that he received numerous kickbacks, often of approxilnately 25% of the amount
of the loans, and that he regularly wired Augustin a share of that kickback in the early jtages of
the scheme. CHS 2 explained that they were doing so many loans by the end of M ay that he
changed course, instead wiring larger lump sums, collecting Augustin's shares of the kickbacks
f0r multiple loans in one wire.
15. 
lnvestigators are still receiving atld analyzing records, but based on a preliminary
analysisj as of August 31, 2020, investigators had identified a total of $2,367,765,82 in transfers
to CHS 2's accounts from  entities that each obtained a sizable PPP loan and that were identified
in the PPP files seized from CHS 2's and another co-conspirator's residences, as described
below or from individuals associated witlz those entities.
16. 
The PPP loans identified above as implicated in the forqgoing kickback payments
to CH S 2 represent only a fraction of the overall sehem e. It1 executing search w an-ants at the
respective residences of UHS 2 and CHS 3, federal agents found stacks of paper printed out and
Page 6 of 20
Case 1:21-cr-20001-MGC   Document 3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020   Page 8 of 22

organized by entity, containing atz Itintak.e fonu,'' fabricated Forms 941, or both for each entity.
The intake fonms contained fields for the infonnation needed to fabricate the documents and fill
out other aspects of the PPP application: identifying infonnation about the owner and company,
as well afs ballk accotlnt infonnation for receiving the loan. A section at the end marked IIBELOW
IS OFFICE USE ONLY'' incltlded blank fields for the ttNumber of Employees,'' ççklenthly Payroll
Expense,'' and ttSBA Loan Pre-Approval Amount.'' Between CHS 2's and CHS 3's l'esidences,
investigators seized paper files for PPP loan applicatiolzs for approxim ately 80 different entities.
Data obtained from the SBA showed additional PPP loan applications from
additional entities that text m essage and email records show had been refen-ed to CHS 2 by
m em bers of the conspiracy.
The Frclltfzz/cz;f ### Loan to F/lrtn,fWflc/dtyràçt<p.î. com
18. 
According to Florida's Division of Colmorations website (:1Sunbiz''),
Throwbackjerseys.com was incorporated in or around April of 2018. SMITH is listed as the
company's manager and registered agent. 'Ihe address listed on Sunbiz for Throwbackjerseys.com
is 7958 Pines Blvd, PM B 453, Pembroke Pines, FL 33024. Investigators visited this address and
were unable to lind any business named tTlu-owbackjerseys.com'' at that location. Rather, that
address appears to be lnerely a m ailbox at çtDiscount Postal & Business Center,'' a slzipping and
mailing store. The web address tThrowbackjerseys.com'' does not lead to an operating website
on the intelmet. According to bank records, on or about June 3, 2019, SM ITH opened a business
checking account in the name of Throwbackjerseys.com and was the sole signatory on the account.
19. 
On or about M ay l7, 2020, a PPP loan application and supporting docum ents on
behalfof Throwbackjerseys.com were electronically submitted to Bank 3 through Bank Processor
The suppol4ing documents included, among other documents: (1) pul-ported Forms 941 for a1l
Page 7 of 20
Case 1:21-cr-20001-MGC   Document 3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020   Page 9 of 22

four quarters of 20 19 inthe name of the company; (2) a company bank statement; (3) an application
form; and (4) a promissory note.
20. 
The purpol-ted Forms 941 for Throwbackjerseys.com included in the application
show quarterly payroll of more than $5 00,000 each quarter, for 20 employees. That qual-terly
payroll figure yielded the PPP loan application's GçAverage M onthly Payroll'' figure of $170,687,
which detenuined the $426,717 amotmt of the loan. Each was signed by hand with the name
tiDiamond Sm ith'' as the company owner, and also listed SM ITH as the company's designee and
as a tçpaid Preparer,'' though he is not a paid tax preparer. The Throwbackjerseys.com Fol'ms 941
follow the same style and patten) as the lnany other Fonns 941 that CHS 2 described above,
acknowledged that he helped create and subm it in the course of the scheme, including in the indicia
of fraud,s IRS records show that Throwbackjerseys.com did not, in fact, file any Fonns 941 for
any quarter of 20 19 or the first quarter of 2020, and Florida Department of Revenue records show
that Throwbackjerseys.com did not repol't any wages or employees for that same period,
2 1. 
rrhe purpo/ed company bal'tlc statem ent, which wtts submitled in electronic folnnat,
is a clear forgery, First, Throwbackjerseys.com does not have its business account at the bank
5 
As noted above, SM ITH was listed as both owner and paid preparer. Dozens of ether
Folnns 941 submitted in this scheme evidence the snm e en'or. CHS 2 has admitted that these
doculnents share that feature because he lnisunderstood the fon'n, and he (or someone following
his instnzctions) prepared a11 of the Folnns 941 at issue. The content of the folnns also indicate
falsificatien. 
A11 four quarterly fonns are nearly identical, and the four fol'm s for
Throwbackjerseys.com are identical, down to the penny, in reported figures. They also evidence
a pattern of payroll spending that is likely false: qach of the quarters shows significant increases
from the first to second to third month of the quarter. For each identical fonn, the sam e figures
are repoded for the tax liability incun'ed in the first m onth of each quarter, the same figure for the
second month of each qual-ter (increased substantially from the first month), and the same figure
for the third month of the quarter (increased substantially from the sècond month). The result is
that the company reports a pelfectly repeating cycle of ascending payroll costs within each qum-ter,
CHS 2 has explained that this was due to a folnnula he used, allocating different percentages of the
quarterly payroll tax liability to each m onth of each quarter.
Page 8 of 20
Case 1:21-cr-20001-MGC   Document 3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020   Page 10 of 22

from whiéh the statement was pup ol-tedly drawn. Second, according to the document's file
tlpropertiesr'' the statement was created using ITDFFILLER,'' a progrmn used to edit electronic
PDF files, and it was Glm odified using iTex1a'' Third, the stateluent is a recycled version of the
sam e falsified Bank 6 statement used in other fraudulent applicatiolzs subm itled as part of this
scheme,
22. 
The PPP ioan application fonn, labeled at the top ttpaym ent Protection Propam
Bolwwer Application Form,'' listed SMITH as the owner of Thmwbackjerseys.com, claimed 1he
company had 21 eluployees, and stated that the average monthly payroll was $170,687. Based on
this figure, the am ount of the PPP loan request was $426,717. 'Fhe application fonn required the
borrower to electronically initial a number of Ktcel-tificationsz'' including. (l) that the applicant was
in operation on Feblmary 15, 2020 alzd had employees to whom it paid salaries/payroll taxes or
paid independent contractors, as repol-ted on Fonnts) 1099., (2) that the funds would be used to
retain workers, maintain payroll, or m ake luol4gage/intel'esvlease/tltility payments as specified by
the PPP nlle and that tmautlzorized use could result in charges for fraud; and (3) that the
iafbrmation provided in the application, including in suppol-ting docum ents, was lûtrue and accurate
in a11 material respects,'' and that m aking false statements could result in criminal charges. The
application was electronically sir ed using SNIITH'S initials EIDBS,'' which appears similar to
SMITH'S signature in Florida's Driver and Vehicle Information Database (:GDAVID''). Eaeh
certification was electronically initialed IIDBS'' as well,
7-he prom issory note, labeled at the 1op tçpaycheck Protection Prom am Loan,'' set
fohrth the amount of the loan ($426,717) and its tenus (including that the proceeds could only be
used for business pumoses). The terms also specified that the borrower may apply for loan
forgiveness only in an amotmt equal to the sum ofcel-tain specified costs: payroll costs, interest on
Page 9 of 20
Case 1:21-cr-20001-MGC   Document 3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020   Page 11 of 22

mortgage obligations, rent obligations, atzd utility paym ents. 'I'he promissol-y note fm-ther specificd
that not m ore than 25% of the alnount of forgiveness can be attributable to non-payroll costs.
Additionally, the promissory note contained a Gtlkepresentations and W arranties'' section for the
bon-ower to acknowledge, among other things that ttthe infonnation provided in a11 suppolïing
docum ents and fonns to obtain this loan'' were tnle and accurate. The prom issol'y note was
electronically signed witlz SM ITH'S initials 'LDBS,'' which appem's sim ilar to the signattlre in the
loan application fonn and in DAVID.
24. 
Barlk Processor 1 's IntenAet Protocol CIIP'') records for the Throwbackjerseys.com
loan application show that a computer with an IP address (ending in 170) associated with CHS 2's
residence in Broward County, Florida, logged into the Throwbackjerseys.com loan account as
early as M ay 17, 2020. The session records also reveal subsequent logins by one or m ore mobile
devices whose IP addresses logged into the Throwbackjerseysacom loan account on May 18, 2020,
and M ay 19, 2020, Bank records show that mobile devicets) using the same IP addresses (ending
in 61, 166, 195 and 196) also accessed the 'Throwbackjerseys.com bank account on May 18, 2020,
and M ay l9, 2020, Records received from Docusign indicate that the 1oarl application and
promissory note were signed on May 18, 2020 at 11:58 a.m. (PST) via a mobile device using P
address ending in 6 1.6 Likewise, thc records from Bank Processor 1 indicate that the bon-ower
6 
The Docusir records reflect that the electronic sir atures adopted for both loans were
ttdrawn on device,'' which indicates that the adopted signatures were manually drawn by the sir er.
'Ihe other option available would have been to select one of the predefined styles from the
Docusign provam, which would then populate the sir ature line with the Glpre-selected style.''
As m entioned above in Parap-aphs 22 and 23, the D ocusign signature on the loan application and
promissory note for Throwbackjerseys.com appears to match SM ITH'S DAVID signature. By
colztrast, as discussed in Parap aphs 31 and 32 below, the Docusir  signature on the loan
application and prolnissory note for Blue Star Records does not appear to matclz the DAVID
signature of Person 53.
Page 10 of 20
Case 1:21-cr-20001-MGC   Document 3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020   Page 12 of 22

approved the loan documents via Docusign on May 18, 2020 at 11:58 a.m. (PSTI using a mobile
device with IP address ending in 61.
25. 
Based on the l'epresentations made in the loan application paperwork and
suppol-ting doctlments, the PPP loan application for Thtowbackjerseysacom wms approved, and on
or about M ay 20, 2020, Ballk 3 wired approximately $426,717 in loan proceeds into the
Throwbackjerseys.com bank accoklnt.
The FrcIz#II!t4?;/ PPP Loall to Blue Star Records
26, 
According to Stmbiz, Blue Star Records was incolmorated in or around December
of 20 12, with SM ITH listed as the registered agent atzd manager. On M ay 2 1, 2020, one day after
the PPP loan amount was wired to the Throwbackjerseys.com's account, an annual repol't was filed
in Stlnbiz for Blue Star Records that added Person 53 as a manager. As disctlssed below, text
colnmunication between SM ITH.M II CHS 2 revealed that SM ITH was the tnle owner of Blue Star
Records and that Person f 3 was SM ITH'S m other.
T1 ddress listed in Sunbiz for Blue Star Records is 40 11 N.W . 194* Street, M iami
27. 
le a
Gardens, FL 33056. hw estigators visited this address and were unable to find any business nmned
ttBlue Star Records'' at that location. M/hat they found instead was a single-family residence in a
residential neighborhood. According to ballk records, on or about April 5, 2013, SM ITH and
another individual opened a business checking account in the nm'ne of Blue Star Records. Starting
on Febnlary 25, 20 19, SM ITH became the sole signatory on the Blue Star Records account. The
bank records I have reviewed for Blue Star Records indicate that Person 53 was never added to
the Blue Star Records account.
On M ay 21, 2020, the day on whiuh Person 53 was added as a m anager of Blue Star
Records itl Sunbiz, a PPP loan application and stlpporfing doculnents on behalf of Blue Star
Records were electronically submitled to Balzlt 3 through Bank Processor 1. The supporting
Page 11 of 20
Case 1:21-cr-20001-MGC   Document 3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020   Page 13 of 22

documents included, among other documents: (1) puported Fonm 941 for all four quarters of
20 19 in the name of the company; (2) a company balzk statement', (3) an application fonu; and (4)
a promissory note.
'lhe purported Folmzs 941 for Blue Star Records included in the application show
quarterly payroll of more than $800,000 each quarter, for 35 employees.That quarterly payroll
figure yielded the PPP loan application's t'Average M onthly Payroll'' figure of $283,226, which
detennined the $708,065 amount of the loan.Each Fonn 941 was signed by hand with the name
of Person 53 as the company owner, Like the Throwbackjerseys.com Forms 941, these Fol-ms 941
also listed Person 53 as the company's designee and as a Gtpaid Preparers'' though she is not a paid
tax preparer. 7Ye Blue Star Records Fon'ns 941 follow the snm e style and pattern as the many
other Forms 941 that CHS 2 helped create and submit in the course of the scheme, including in the
indicia of fraud discussed in note 5 above. IRS records show that Blue Star Records did not, in
fact, file any Fonus 941 for any quarter of 20 19 orthe first qual-ter of 2020, and Florida Depallm ent
of Reveque records show that Blue Star Records did not repol't any w ages or em ployees for that
same period,
3O.
statement for Blue Star Records, which was subm itted in electronic fonuat, is a clear forgery. First,
Blue Star Records does not have its business account at the bank from which the statement was
As was the case with Throwbackjerseys.coln's bank stateluent, the purported balzk
pulpol-tedly drawn. Second, according to the document's file ttproperties,'' the statemeflt Was
created using CTDFFILLER,'' a program used to edit electrolzic PDF files, and it was çlmodified
using iTex1.'' Third, the statement is a recycled version of the same falsificd Bank 1 statement
used in other fraudulent applications subm itted as pal4 of this schem e.
Page 12 of 20
Case 1:21-cr-20001-MGC   Document 3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020   Page 14 of 22

'I'he application fonu for Blue Star Records listed Person 53 as the owner of Blue
Star Records, claimed the company had 35 employees, and stated that the average m onthly payroll
was $283,226. Based on this figure, the amount of the PPP loan request was $708,065. The
application folnn required the bon-ower to electronically initial a number of ççcellifications,'' as
previously described with respect to the application of Tlu-owbackjerseys.com, The application
was electronically sipzed with a sir ature that does not appem- to m atch Person 53's Florida
DAVID signature. Each cellification was electronically initialed with what appear to be the letters
S'DB,'' which differ from the initials of Person 53.
'Fhe promissol'y note, labeled at the top t&paycheck Protection Program Loan,'' set
forth the amount of the loan ($708,065) and its tenns (including that the proceeds could only be
used for business pul-poses), The promissol'y note contained the same tenns previously described
with respect to the promissol'y note for Throwbackjerseys.com. The promissol-y note was
electronically signed with the sam e sir ature reflected in the application fonn.
33. 
Balzk Processor l 's IP records for the Blue Star Records loan application show that
the IP address (ending in 170) associated witlz CHS 2's residence logged into the Blue Star Records
loan account starting on M ay 21, 2020. The session records also reveal subsequent logins by one
or m ore m obile devices whose IP addresses logged into the Blue Star Records loan account on
May 21, 2020, and May 22, 2020.Bank records show that the mobile devicets) with some of the
same IP addresse's (ending in 50 and 204) also accecsed the Throwbackjerseys,com bank account
on M ay 21, 2020, and M ay 22, 2020, and the Blue Star Records/sM l'ri'l bank accounts on M ay
22, 2020.
34. 
Based on the repl-esentations m ade in the loan application paperw ork and
sùpporting documents, the PPP loan application for Blue Star Records was approved, and on or
Page 13 of 20
Case 1:21-cr-20001-MGC   Document 3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020   Page 15 of 22

about May 26, 2020, Bank 3 wired approximately $708,065 in loan proceeds into the Blue Star
Records bank account.
CHS 2 Cblz/-trzwefd to Law Enforcement that tlte Throwbackiersevs.com. card Blue S//lr Recorh
PPP fatmzz.ç W ere FrJII#IJt4?z/ and //l:lz SLYIITH  Referred Others to tlte Scheme
lnvestigators spoke witlz CHS 
about SM ITH and the 
loans
Throwbackjerseys.com and Blue Star Records. CHS 2 stated that he met SMITH through
Augustin. According to CHS 2, the three of them met in person and discussed a PPP loan for
SM ITH and the 25% kickbaclt paym ents that SM ITH would pay CHS 2 and Augustin out of the
loan amount. According to CHS 2, SM ITH initially requested a one m illion dollar PPP loan, but
CHS 2 convinced him to keep the loan below $500,000. SM ITH agreed to pay CHS 2 and
Augustin akickbaçk, but he obtained from CHS 2 an agreem ent in return that CHS 2 would prepare
aàditional paperwork to help repair SM ITH'S credit.
CHS 2 stated that he helped SM ITH apply for a PPP loan for his company,
Throwbackjerseys.com. According to CHS 2, once SMITH was approved for the first PPP loan,
SM ITH provided him infonration about Blue Star Records, advised CHS 2 that it was SM ITH'S
colnpany, &nd indicated the amount he wanted CHS 2 to request for a second PPP loan. According
to CHS 2, he explained to SM ITH that he could only be awarded one PPP loan in his nam e. CHS
2 stated that SM ITH told him Person 53 was his m other, and that, at SM ITH'S request, CHS 2
added her to Blue Star Records in Sunbiz so that SM ITH could apply for a second PPP loan.
37. 
As to the Throwbackjerseys.com and Blue Star Records PPP loans, CHS 2
confilnned that the loan applications were fraudulent and stated that he had assisted SM ITH in
preparing and submitting them. CHS 2 stated that he: (1) created for SM. ITH an online account
for Throwbackjerseys.com and Blue Star Records with Bank Processor 1', (2) created and
submitted a fake bank statement for Throwbackjerseys.com mAd Blue Star Records; and (3)
Page 14 of 20
Case 1:21-cr-20001-MGC   Document 3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020   Page 16 of 22

created, submitled, and signed (011 behalf of SMITH), the false Fol-ms 941. According to CHS 2,
he did not sign the application fonu or promissory note for either Throwbackjerseys.com or Blue
Star Records.
38. 
CHS 2 also stated that, in addition to Throwbackjerseys,com and Blue Star Records,
SM ITH refen'ed to him two additional friends/associates for the pulmose of creating and subm itting
additional fraudulent PPP loans. As stated above, CHS 2 and Augustin would share a 25%
kickback for these refen-als, CHS 2 said he advised SM ITH that he would receive a 5% share of
the loan payout for his refen-als. According to CHS 2, he acted on the first referral that SM ITH
submitted to him, but did notlling regarding the second one because SM ITH sought to renegotiate
the kickbaek am ount he would be owed vis-a-vis CHS 2 and Augustin's share.
( 
Em ails ca: Text A.fcâ-,j'ced5' Confirm SZI#'.JFf.!'',j' Knowinz Participation in the Frtzll#
39. 
As part of its illvestigation, 1aw enforcelnent obtained com mullications between
CHS 2 and SM ITH, including text messages and emails. l have reviewed a number of these
communicatiolls, which discuss, among other things, SM ITH'S PPP loans and the loalzs for the
friends/associates he refen-ed to CHS 2,
40. 
For example, on or about M ay 17, 2020, Augustin sent CHS 2 a text message with
the information for Throwbackjerseys.com's PPP loan application, including the company's bank
accotmt num ber, EIN tax ID num ber, and SM ITH 'S cell phone num ber. That sam e day, CH S 2
sent a text m essage to SM ITH that stated; ttl-li please call m e working on your sba file.''
41. 
The nex-t day, M ay 18, 2020, SM ITH sent a tex't to CHS 2 stating, :1I was able to
1og in.'' CHS 2 asked SM ITH, t'You activated the account?'' According to CHS 2, and consistent
with infonration obtained from Bank Processor 1 regarding the application process, after CHS 2
created SM ITH'S account to apply for a PPP loan on Bank Processor 1's website, SM ITH would
Page 15 of 20
Case 1:21-cr-20001-MGC   Document 3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020   Page 17 of 22

have reeeived an em ail from Bank Processor 1, and upon aceessing that em ail, SM ITH would need
to activate the açcount. SM ITH responded in two consecutive text messages, :11 think so, but it
says there are m ore tasks'' and t'should I complete those tasks?'' CHS 2 responded, tçYes I have to
add documents now pgllease send me the new password'' and çtNo you can't I have the docs.''
According to CHS 2, this was the step in the application process at which he would upload the
Forms 941 for the bon'ower. SM ITH advised CHS 2 that the password was the same and then
restated the steps he had taken:ttwhen 1 clicked the activate button, 1 was asked to 1og in, that was
it, then it asked m e to tsee taslts' to complete which is uploading documents.'' CHS 2 answered
that he ltwould take care of that in the a1u.''
Later that day, M ay 18, 2020, SM ITH texrted CHS 2 notifying him that t%hey sent
email and asked me to acctpt loan, says I was approved,''That same night, SM ITH sent a text to
CHS 2 with a screenslzot of a message from Bgnk Processor l stating, çl-l-hank you for accepting
your offer for the Paycheck Protection Program .
accotmt you provided in your application . . ..''
Processor 1 thanking the bon'ower for accepting the offer occurs after the borrower signs the loan
W e've initiated an ACH deposit into the bank
CHS 2 explained that the notifieation from Bank
application and promissory note.
43, 
ln the sam e minute that SM ITH sent CHS 2 the screenshot from Bank Processor 1,
SM ITH sent CH S 2 a text m essage about Blue Stm' Records w ith its balak account num ber and
Em  tax ID num ber. Two minutes later, SM ITH texted CHS 2 with Blue Star Records' address
and SM ITH'S name as its owner. On M ay 21, 2020, SM ITH followed-up by sending CHS 2 atext
message asking, Itwhat is the infb you needed for bluestar.'' CHS 2 responded by asking, ltis that
your company bluestar'' and SM ITH answered, Gdyes.'' CHS 2's phone retlects that SM ITH called
him twice, after which SM ITH sent CHS 2 another tex't m essage, saying: ttnam e to add to Blue
Page 16 of 20
Case 1:21-cr-20001-MGC   Document 3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020   Page 18 of 22

Star Records 11c (Stmbiz.orgl'' and included the nnme of Person 53, her social security number,
home address and em ail address. CHS 2 then reqtlested more infonnation: (tneed your mom s date
of birth. I need an em ail that is good And I need business stm't date.'' SM ITH texted CHS 2 with
Person 53's date of bil4lz, her em ail address once again, and the start date for Blue Star Records.
44. 
On M ay 22, 2020, CHS 2 sent SM ITH a text message with the following
instlmctions: ttcheck em ail for your company activate tlse em ail as user and the password is
(redactedj a11 lower case.'' CHS 2 explained that this was the point at which SMITH needed to
open the email from Bank Processor 1 and activate the account CHS 2 created for the Blue Star
Records PPP loan applicatiolz process.
45. 
On M ay 26, 2020, SM ITH sent CH S 2 a text m essage letting him  know he had sent
him 1û$f 0,000:7 and would lçsend another wire tomol-row and day after.'' On M ay 29, 2020, SMITH
alel-ted CHS 2 via texl that he had wired him another $50,000, and wrote, ltso that's $140,000,''
which was approximately 20% of the PPP loan amount he received for Blue Star Records. SM ITH
then sent CHS 2 a tex-t message stating, Gtok now I need you to make me som e m oney and I still
don't have a car,'' SM ITH followed that text message with another one that included a website for
the sale of a used Lamborghini Aventador.
46, 
During 1ny review of SM ITH'S communications with CHS 2, 1 found what appears
to be infol-m ation pertaining to PPP loan refen-als for tw o other com panies. On M ay 20, 2020,
SM ITH sent a text message to CHS 2 and provided a company nam e, date of incorporation, EIN
tax ID number, its' address, baz'lk account number, the nam e of the individual associated with the
company, email address, and phone num ber. Later that day, CHS 2 responded with a text asking
SM ITH for the individual's social security number, date of birth, home address and for
Page 17 of 20
Case 1:21-cr-20001-MGC   Document 3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020   Page 19 of 22

confirmation of the emaii address SM ITH had provided. SM ITH responded on M ay 21, 2020,
with a text message that conu ined the infbnnation CHS 2 had requested.
47. 
On June 4, 2020, SM ITH sent CHS 2 a text m essage about tçanother client'' and
attached a hand-writlen note about anotller individual, Person 54, and the associated company
contahling the sam e detailed information that CHS 2 had previously reqtlested for the other 1oan
applications. M inm i-Dade County's m alniage license bureau shows that Person 54 is m anied to
Person 53 and is SM ITH'S step-father,According to Stlnbiz, Person 54's company was inactive
until a reinstatem ent was filed with Stmbiz on June 1, 2020. On June 5, 2020, SM ITH followed
up with CHS 2, and sought to remind him, tçso this is my second refen-al.'' Ftll-ther investigatiow
including review of data collected from Balzk Processor 1, suggests that a PPP loan application
was initiated for the first entity that SM ITH refeln-ed, but the application process was not
colnpleted.
SS4ITH 'S sJ/l/J?zt. Activitv Cba/-lraz: His A-/ltndar Participation ï,l the FrcllJ
48. 
I have also reviewed the bank records for Throwbackjerseys.com, Blue Star
Records, SM ITH and CHS 2, which confirm SM ITH'S receipt of the PPP loan proceeds.
Specifically, on or about M ay 20, 2020, Bank 3 wired the loan amount, $426,717, into the
Throwbackjerseys.com account. As of May 1, 2020, the Tlzrowbackjerseys.com accotmt had a
balance of $642.57, and before the PPP loan alnount arrived on M ay 20th, the account balance wms
dgwn to $218.68. 7Ye balzk statem ents also indicate that as of M ay 2020, the account had been
charged $9 10 in overdraft fees for the year. Upon receiving the PPP loan amount on M ay 2O,
2020, SM ITH wired $90,000 to CHS 2's accotmt, which is approxim ately 2 1% of the loan nmount.
On M ay 22, 2020, SM ITH wired $214,000 to the Blue Star Records account and transfen-ed
another $5,000 to his personal account. There were transfers made to several individuals after the
loan was received, but based on my training and experience, these do not resemble salary
Page 18 of 20
Case 1:21-cr-20001-MGC   Document 3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020   Page 20 of 22

paym ents, as they were multi-thousand dollal-, rounded-num ber paym ents that were not repeated
in June. By August 3, 2020, the Throwbackjerseysacom accotlnt had a zero balance.
49. 
On or about M ay 26, 2020, Balzk 3 wired the loan amount of $708,065 into the Blue
Star Records account. 'l'he accokmt had a zero balance to stm4 the month of M ay, which grew to
$13,100 before the account received $214,000 from the Throwbackjerseys,com account on May
22, 2020. Between M ay 26, 2020 and M ay 29, 2020, SM ITH made tllree wire paym ents to one of
CHS 2's accounts, totalîng $140,000, and on M ay 26, 2020, he màde a separate $10,000 payment
directlyto Augustin. The paym ents totaling $150,000, are appl-oximately 2 1% of the loan am ount.
50, 
Between May 26, 2020 and May 27, 2020, SM ITH transferred $1,036,667,08 from
the Bltle Star Records account to his personal accotmt. SM ITH'S personal account had a balance
of $1,021,97 as of M ay 14, 2020. Between M ay 26, 2020 and M ay 29, 2020, SMITH transfen'ed
$294,453.79 from his personal account back to the Blue Star Records account, resulting in a net
transfer to his personal account of $742,2 13, In June, SMITH lzad a net transfer of another
$245,040.07 to the Blue Star Records accotmt from his personal account. By June 30, 2020, the
ending balance for the Blue star Records account was -$600.02. On July 13, 20209 the unding
balance oh SM ITH'S personal account was zero. In all, following SM ITH'S receipt of the PPP
loan proceeds, his net transfers froln the Throwbackjerseys.com and Blue Star Records accounts
to his personal account totaled approxim ately $502,173.
51. 
Bank records show what appear to be purchases of luxury items and personal
expenses ttsing loan proceeds. For example, between June 22, 2020 and July 6, 2020, SM ITH
spent approximately $27, 176 at the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel and Casino. On June 24, 2020,
and Jtlly 2, 2020, SM ITH purchased $2,290 in goods at Versace. In addition, bank records show
that SM ITH withdrew approxim ately $271,805 between M ay 26, 2020 and August 3, 2020.
Page 19 of 20
Case 1:21-cr-20001-MGC   Document 3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020   Page 21 of 22

52. 
R'ecords from the Blue Star Records account show that a clzeck dated June 9, 2020,
bearing SM ITH'S signaturc was issucd h'om the Blue Star Rccords account to Person 55 in the
amount of $96,000, with a note indicating it was a t'company vehicle payment.'' On four separatc
occasions in Septelnber 2020, investigators have obselwed a black Ferrari parked at SM ITH'S
residence. The Ferrari has a temporary tag registered to a company owned by Person 55.
CO N CLUSIO N
53. 
Based on the forgoing, 1 respectfully subm it that there is probable cause to believe
that DIAM OND BLUE SM ITH committed the Target Offenses.
FU RTHER YOUR A FFIANT SAYETH NAU GHT.
L; < 
z,
j,> 
e
.r1 . 
lj
' /
.iz-b.%.-z 
--, ..--, 
.k.
.
.. 
. /
W ' 
E Ro- crs Jr.
an cn . 
g ,
Special Agctlt
IRS-CI 
l D #6335
Attested to by thz applicant in aceordance
with the requirelnents ( Fed. R. Criln. P. 4. 1
by telephone on thi 0 Day of Septmnber, 2020
HONORA E EDW IN G. TORRES
UNITED STATES M AGISTRA'FE JUDGE
Page 20 of 20
Case 1:21-cr-20001-MGC   Document 3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020   Page 22 of 22

File and source

File

006_ECF_3_gov.uscourts.flsd.584237.3.0.pdf

Size

1,161,811 bytes

SHA-256

a4a8cf4892a8d321b84ae9cc0703764692ce296e217e81e3af1080228b44eb68

Our copy

006_ECF_3_gov.uscourts.flsd.584237.3.0.pdf

Original

storage.courtlistener.com