Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) — United States v. Williams (Dkt. 54, M.D. Ala.)

Summary

Order on form AO 247 in United States v. Pamela Denise Williams (Case No. 3:23cr98-RAH-1, Middle District of Alabama), dated June 5, 2024 and filed as Document 54. On the defendant's motion for a reduction of the term of imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), based on a guideline sentencing range later lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission, the court ordered the motion DENIED. The date of the original judgment is 01/18/2024, Richard Benjamin White, Jr. is listed as defendant's attorney, and the order is signed by R. Austin Huffaker, Jr., U.S. District Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

AO 247 (Rev. 03/19)   Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
Page 1 of 2 (Page 2 Not for Public Disclosure)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the

__________ District of __________

United States of America
)
)
)
)
)
)

v.

Case No:
USM No:
Date of Original Judgment:
Date of Previous Amended Judgment:
(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any)
Defendant’s Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of
u the defendant u the Director of the Bureau of Prisons u the court under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has
subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10
and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:
u DENIED.
u GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in
the last judgment issued) of
months is reduced to
.
(See Page 2 for additional parts. Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated
shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Order Date:
Judge’s signature

Effective Date:
(if different from order date)
Printed name and title

The defendant received no Chapter Four status points at her original sentencing and was not determined to be a zero-point offender. Pursuant to
USSG §1B1.10(a)(2)(A), a reduction in the defendant's term of imprisonment is not consistent with this policy statement and therefore is not
authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) because none of the amendments listed in subsection (d) is applicable to the defendant.

Judge’s sisisisisisisign
gn
gn
gn
gn
gn
gn
g ature

         Middle District of Alabama

Pamela Denise Williams
3:23cr98-RAH-1

49155-510
01/18/2024
Richard Benjamin White, Jr.

✔

✔

06/05/2024

R. Austin Huffaker, Jr., U.S. District Judge

Case 3:23-cr-00098-RAH-JTA   Document 54   Filed 06/05/24   Page 1 of 1


File and source

File

54.pdf

Size

189,999 bytes

SHA-256

79602a8a8b1e97d32d622c77349e0c2a4440bcb1625081c1306ba10db2d58b19

Our copy

54.pdf