Order of Forfeiture (Money Judgment) — United States v. Christnel Orisca (D. Mass.)

Summary

An Order of Forfeiture (Money Judgment) in United States of America v. Christnel Orisca, Criminal No. 24-CR-10378-JEK, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, filed May 27, 2026 as Document 51-1. It recites that a six-count Indictment returned on December 12, 2024 charged wire fraud (Counts One-Five) and false statements to a financial institution (Count Six), and that on November 25, 2025 the defendant pled guilty to Counts One through Six under a written plea agreement. In that agreement the defendant agreed to forfeit $54,700 as the proceeds of the offense. The order enters a personal money judgment of $54,700 against the defendant and lets the United States seek substitute property and discovery to satisfy it. The signature block names United States District Judge Julia E. Kobick.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
) 
) 
   v. 
)  Criminal No. 24-CR-10378-JEK 
) 
CHRISTNEL ORISCA, 
) 
 
Defendant. 
) 
 
 
ORDER OF FORFEITURE (MONEY JUDGMENT) 
 
KOBICK, D.J.  
WHEREAS, on December 12, 2024, a federal grand jury sitting in the District of 
Massachusetts returned a six-count Indictment charging defendant Christnel Orisca (the 
ADefendant@) with Wire Fraud; Aiding and Abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2 
(Counts One-Five), and False Statements to a Financial Institution; Aiding and Abetting, in 
violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1014 and 2 (Count Six);  
WHEREAS, the Indictment also included a Wire Faud forfeiture allegation, pursuant to 
18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), which provided notice that the United States 
intended to seek the forfeiture, upon conviction of the Defendant of one or more of the offenses 
alleged in Counts One through Five of the Indictment, of any property, real or personal, that 
constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds traceable to the commission of the offenses; 
WHEREAS, such property specifically included, without limitation: 
a. 
$54,700, to be entered in the form of a forfeiture money judgment; 
WHEREAS, the Indictment further provided that, if any of the above-described 
forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission by the Defendant, (a) cannot be located 
upon the exercise of due diligence; (b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third 
Case 1:24-cr-10378-JEK     Document 51-1     Filed 05/27/26     Page 1 of 3

 
 
2 
party; (c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court; (d) has been substantially 
diminished in value; or (e) has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided 
without difficulty, it is the intention of the United States to seek forfeiture of any other property 
of the Defendant, up to the value of such assets, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 
2461(c), incorporating Title United States Code Section 853(p); 
WHEREAS, on November 25, 2025, at a hearing pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal 
Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Defendant pled guilty to Counts One through Six of the 
Indictment, pursuant to a written plea agreement that he signed on October 30, 2025;  
WHEREAS, in Section 6 of the plea agreement, the Defendant agreed to forfeit to the 
United States $54,700 on the grounds that such an amount is equal to the amount of proceeds the 
Defendant derived from the offense as a result of his guilty plea; 
WHEREAS, based on the Defendant's admissions in the written plea agreement and his 
guilty plea on November 25, 2025, the United States is entitled to an Order of Forfeiture 
consisting of a personal money judgment against the Defendant, in the amount of $54,700 in 
United States currency, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c); 
WHEREAS, the amount of $54,700 constitutes proceeds that the Defendant obtained as a 
result of violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2; and 
WHEREAS, Rule 32.2(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provides that 
Ano ancillary proceeding is required to the extent that the forfeiture consists of a money 
judgment.@ 
ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: 
1. 
The Defendant shall forfeit to the United States the sum of $54,700, pursuant to 
Case 1:24-cr-10378-JEK     Document 51-1     Filed 05/27/26     Page 2 of 3

3 
18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c). 
2.
This Court shall retain jurisdiction in the case for the purpose of enforcing this
Order. 
3.
The United States may, at any time, move pursuant to Rule 32.2(e) of the Federal
Rules of Criminal Procedure to amend this Order to substitute property having a value not to 
exceed the amount set forth in Paragraph 1 to satisfy the money judgment in whole or in part. 
4.
The United States may, at any time, conduct pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and 21 U.S.C. § 853(m), as incorporated by 
28 U.S.C. 2461, any discovery to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property or substitute 
assets, including, but not limited to, depositions and requests for documents, electronically stored 
information, and tangible things. 
5.
Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4), this Order shall be included in the sentence
pronounced and imposed by the Court at the sentencing hearing, and in the criminal judgment 
entered by this Court against the Defendant. 
JULIA E. KOBICK  
United States District Judge 
Dated: 
May 27, 2026
Case 1:24-cr-10378-JEK     Document 51-1     Filed 05/27/26     Page 3 of 3

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.mad.278745.51.1.pdf

Size

190,407 bytes

SHA-256

33ce2d76eaf1575fd8c56f4faaa51a2d2f63edb95e436b8a0837822a38608eab

Our copy

gov.uscourts.mad.278745.51.1.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)