Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Mirza Michael Reazuddin case — U.S. District Court, W.D. Mo. Order — United States v. Reazuddin (Dkt. 29, W.D. Mo.)

Court filing

Order — United States v. Reazuddin (Dkt. 29, W.D. Mo.)

Summary

Magistrate Judge Jill A. Morris denied defense counsel's unopposed motion to withdraw from Mirza Michael Reazuddin's case, which cited an irreparable breakdown in communication. Counsel was retained, and his financial affidavit shows he is not entitled to appointed counsel, so counsel stays until a replacement appears.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed October 20, 2023 in Mirza Michael Reazuddin; one of 15 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Filed2023-10-20

Cite this document

“Order — United States v. Reazuddin (Dkt. 29, W.D. Mo.).” U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, No. 4:23-cr-00067, Doc. 29, filed 2023-10-20. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/us-v-mirza-michael-reazuddin/2023-10-20-order-dkt-29/, SHA-256 ca3badd6d604dbf9d43cd19b0ae767af5931d39daf3bf8eb4ed163c25d975a2d.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
                           WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
                                WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                           )
                                                    )
                              Plaintiff,            )
                                                    )
v.                                                  )        Case No. 23-00067-01-CR-W-BP
                                                    )
MIRZA MICHAEL REAZUDDIN,                            )
                                                    )
                              Defendant.            )

                                             ORDER

       Before the Court is defense counsel’s Unopposed Motion to Withdraw. (Doc. 28) Defense

counsel seeks to withdraw based upon an irreparable breakdown in communication. The Court

notes that counsel was retained in this case; review of Defendant’s financial affidavit (Doc. 6)

indicates he is not entitled to appointment of counsel. Until replacement counsel enters an

appearance or alternate representation is otherwise addressed, it is

       ORDERED that defense counsel’s Motion to Withdraw is denied.




                                                             /s/ Jill A. Morris
                                                             JILL A. MORRIS
                                                    UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE




           Case 4:23-cr-00067-BP Document 29 Filed 10/20/23 Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
29.pdf
Size
90,304 bytes
SHA-256
ca3badd6d604dbf9d43cd19b0ae767af5931d39daf3bf8eb4ed163c25d975a2d
Our copy
29.pdf
Back to top