Court filing
Motion for a Protective Order Authorizing the Disclosure of Private Health Information, Sensitive Financial Information, and Personal Identification Information — United States v. Grenon (Dkt. 58, S.D. Fla.)
Summary
The United States' motion for a protective order authorizing the disclosure of private health information, sensitive financial information and personal identification information in United States v. Joseph Timothy Grenon, Case No. 21-20242-CR, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, entered January 7, 2022 as Document 58. It states that the discovery to be produced to the defendant contains such information and asks the court, under the standing discovery order and Rule 16(d)(1), to enter the attached proposed protective order. It is served on the pro se defendant at the Miami Federal Detention Center.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed January 7, 2022 in Joseph Timothy Grenon; one of 22 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2022-01-07 |
Cite this document
“Motion for a Protective Order Authorizing the Disclosure of Private Health Information, Sensitive Financial Information, and Personal Identification Information — United States v. Grenon (Dkt. 58, S.D. Fla.).”
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, No. 1:21-cr-20242, Doc. 58, filed 2022-01-07. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/us-v-mark-scott-grenon/2022-01-07-motion-for-a-protective-order-authorizing-the-disclosure-of-dkt-58/
, SHA-256 dbf2674abff8842cf3fb7518d9488b521c32880d07bf5c799ba1d004b5e5f67f.Full text
Case 1:21-cr-20242-CMA Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2022 Page 1 of 6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 21-20242-CR-ALTONAGA/TORRES
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v.
JOSEPH TIMOTHY GRENON,
Defendant.
/
MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER AUTHORIZING THE DISCLOSURE OF
PRIVATE HEALTH INFORMATION, SENSITIVE FINANCIAL INFORMATION,
AND PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION
The United States of America moves this Court to enter a protective order regarding
discovery to be provided to JOSEPH TIMOTHY GRENON (the “Defendant”). This discovery
contains private health information, sensitive financial information, and personal identification
information. In support of this motion, the United States submits the following:
1. On April 22, 2021, a federal grand jury sitting in the Southern District of Florida
returned an Indictment charging the Defendant and his alleged co-conspirators with a multi-object
conspiracy to (a) defraud the United States and its agencies, (b) commit an offense against the
United States by introducing an unapproved new drug into interstate commerce, in violation of
Title 21, United States Code, Sections 331(d), 355(a), and 333(a)(2), and (c) commit an offense
against the United States by introducing a misbranded drug into interstate commerce, in violation
of Title 21, United States Code, Sections 331(a) and 333(a)(2), all in violation of Title 18, United
States Code, Section 371 (Count 1); and criminal contempt, in violation of Title 18, United States
Code, Section 401(3) (Counts 2-3). (D.E. 16.)
2. On December 29, 2021, U.S. Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley issued the
paperless Standing Discovery Order (“SDO”) requiring the United States to disclose to the
Case 1:21-cr-20242-CMA Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2022 Page 2 of 6
Defendant materials covered by the SDO. (D.E. 48.) The SDO requires the United States to
provide the Defendant with documents and other items material to the preparation of the defense
case, a requirement that is largely identical to the disclosure obligations imposed on the United
States by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(a)(1)(E). (Id.)
3. The Defendant has elected to proceed pro se in his defense. (D.E. 50, 55.)
4. Much of the discovery in this case includes the disclosure of private health
information that may be subject to the provisions of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, the
provisions of 45 C.F.R. § 164.102-164.534, or the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1306. The private
health information contained in the discovery material includes, among other things, individually
identifiable health information such as patient health information.
5. Additionally, some of the discovery in this case contains sensitive financial
information of individuals and entities, as well as personal identifying information of the
Defendant and other non-party individuals. The sensitive financial information contained in the
discovery material includes, among other things, bank account numbers, social security numbers,
tax information, dates of birth, signatures, and residential addresses, of the Defendant and other
non-party individuals.
6. Furthermore, some of the discovery in this case includes personal identification
information, including names, social security numbers, dates of birth, and addresses, of the
Defendant and other individuals, including witnesses.
7. Pursuant to the SDO and the United States’ discovery obligations, the United States
seeks to disclose to the Defendant records and documents that contain this private health
information, sensitive financial information, and personal identification information. The
discovery includes voluminous medical records, customer records, emails, and documents
provided by banks that contain personal financial and identifying information. In order to comply
2
Case 1:21-cr-20242-CMA Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2022 Page 3 of 6
with its discovery obligations, undersigned counsel must produce, or make available to inspection,
those documents relating to private health information, sensitive financial information, and
personal identification information. The documents and files in question are voluminous, and
therefore redacting them for private health information, sensitive financial information, and
personal identification information is impracticable. The instant motion and accompanying
proposed protective order seek to achieve the purpose of prompt disclosure of discovery by the
government to the Defendant while simultaneously protecting the privacy rights of witnesses and
uninvolved third parties.
8. Accordingly, in order to ensure the protection of the above-described information
and to avoid the disclosure of this information to other individuals, the United States requests that
the Court enter the attached proposed protective order regulating disclosure of discovery as
follows:
a. The Defendant shall hold the discovery materials in strict confidence, disclosing
such materials only to the extent necessary to assist in his defense of this matter, and the
Defendant may not post the discovery materials to the internet or publicly disseminate the
materials in any other way;
b. The Defendant shall advise any person to whom the discovery materials are
disclosed that, pursuant to this order, the materials must be held in strict confidence, and
the recipient may not further disclose or disseminate the materials in any way, including
by posting the information to the internet;
c. The Defendant shall maintain a log listing each person to whom the discovery
materials are disclosed, which shall be available for the Court’s inspection as appropriate;
d. The Defendant shall obtain a certification from each person to whom the
discovery materials are disclosed, in which the recipient: (1) acknowledges these
3
Case 1:21-cr-20242-CMA Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2022 Page 4 of 6
restrictions as set forth in this order, and (2) agrees that he or she will not disclose or
disseminate the materials without express consent of the Defendant, including by posting
the information to the internet. The Defendant shall not disclose discovery materials to
any person until that person has signed such a certification and provided the signed
certification to the Defendant. The Defendant shall keep a copy of each certification to
identify the individuals who received the discovery materials and the date on which such
materials were first disclosed;
e. Violations of this order by the Defendant, or by any person to whom the
Defendant discloses the discovery materials, may result in sanctions, contempt of court, or
any other punishment which the Court may deem appropriate; and
f. The Defendant agrees that, upon conclusion of the above captioned case, copies
of the discovery materials disclosed to the Defendant pursuant to the terms of this order
shall be destroyed or returned to the United States.
ANALYSIS AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW
A trial court “can and should, where appropriate, place a defendant and his counsel under
enforceable orders against unwarranted disclosure of the material which they may be entitled to
inspect.” Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165, 185 (1969); see generally United States v.
Anderson, 799 F.2d 1438, 1441 (11th Cir. 1986) (noting “courts often order[ ] that discovery
information will remain private.”). Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(1) authorizes the
Court to issue the proposed protective order by permitting courts to deny, restrict, or defer pre-trial
discovery when a party can demonstrate the need for these types of actions. See Fed R. Crim. P.
16(d)(1). The United States does not seek to deny, restrict, or defer the disclosure of information
required by Rule 16 or the SDO. Instead, the United States only seeks to facilitate discovery, while
protecting against the improper disclosure or use of any individual’s private health information,
4
Case 1:21-cr-20242-CMA Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2022 Page 5 of 6
sensitive financial information, or personal identification information. The proposed protective
order, attached as an exhibit hereto, would have no effect on the Defendant’s ability to prepare his
defense and would protect the private health information, sensitive financial information, and
personal identification information of numerous individuals, including witnesses. See, e.g., United
States v. Fischel, 686 F.2d 1082, 1090 (5th Cir. 1982) (stating that “[d]iscovery in criminal cases
is narrowly limited [and] makes no provision for the production of the names and addresses of
witnesses”).
WHEREFORE, the United States respectfully requests that this Court, pursuant to the SDO
and Rule 16(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, enter the attached proposed
protective order concerning the disclosure of private health information, sensitive financial
information, and personal identification information in connection with this case.
Respectfully submitted,
JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
By: /s/Michael B. Homer
Michael B. Homer
Assistant United States Attorney
Court ID No. A5502497
99 Northeast 4th Street
Miami, Florida 33132-2111
Tel: (305) 961-9289
Email: Michael.Homer@usdoj.gov
5
Case 1:21-cr-20242-CMA Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2022 Page 6 of 6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on January 7, 2022, I caused a true and correct copy of the
foregoing to be delivered by U.S. Certified Mail to pro se Defendant Joseph Timothy Grenon at
the Miami Federal Detention Center at 33 Northeast 4th Street, Miami, Florida 33132.
/s/ Michael B. Homer
Michael B. Homer
Assistant United States Attorney
6File and source
- File
- 58.pdf
- Size
- 161,793 bytes
- SHA-256
- dbf2674abff8842cf3fb7518d9488b521c32880d07bf5c799ba1d004b5e5f67f
- Our copy
- 58.pdf