Court filing
Plea Agreement — No. 1:25-cr-03855 (Dkt. 20, D.N.M.)
Summary
Mark A. Long, also known as Marc Long, agreed to plead guilty to Counts 3, 9, 14, 17, 21 and 23 of the indictment in Cr. No. 25-3855 KWR in the District of New Mexico: wire fraud, mail fraud and theft of government property; the agreement was filed December 16, 2025. Long admits that while living in Texas, from about July 2020 into 2021, Long filed fraudulent unemployment insurance claims with the New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions using other people's names and identifying information. Benefits arrived as debit cards mailed to Texas addresses and as direct deposits; the two theft counts alone cover $2,121 and $20,450. The United States agrees to recommend a sentence at the low end of the guideline range.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed December 16, 2025 in No. 1:25-cr-03855; one of 2 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2025-12-16 |
Cite this document
“Plea Agreement — No. 1:25-cr-03855 (Dkt. 20, D.N.M.).”
U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico, No. 1:25-cr-03855, Doc. 20, filed 2025-12-16. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/us-v-mark-a-long/2025-12-16-plea-agreement-dkt-20/
, SHA-256 2a88813844d619c159fe6401c0c328bab6ba91d2e796a7878b7ebe1c75e392eb.Full text
Case 1:25-cr-03855-KWR Document 20 Filed 12/16/25 Page 1 of 16
B''[$,ES
rNrHEr.rNrrEDSrArESDrsrRrcr.";g;l-:HxlPlil-tJf-?33'
FoR rHE DrsrRrcr oF NEW uextcoi o'ffiO2s
MITCHELL R' ELFERS
"#
LINITED STATES OF AMERICA,
CLERK
Plaintiff,
VS. Cr. No.25-3855 KWR
MARK A. LONG, a.k.a. Marc Long,
Defendant.
PLEA AGREEMENT
Pursuant to Rule 11, Fed. R. Crim. P., the parties notify the Court of the following
agreement between the United States of America, by the United States Attorney for the District
of New Mexico, and the Defendant, MARK A. LONG, a.k.a. Marc Long, with the advice and
counsel of his attorney, Guy L. Womack. This agreement is limited to the United States
Attorney's Office for the District of New Mexico and does not bind any other federal, state, or
local agencies or prosecuting authorities.
REPRESENTATION BY COUNSEL
1. The Defendant understands the Defendant's right to be represented by an attorney
and is so represented. The Defendant has thoroughly reviewed all aspects of this case with the
Defendant's attorney and is fully satisfied with that afforney's legal representation.
RIGHTS OF THE DEFENDANT
2. The Defendant further understands the Defendant's rights:
a. to plead not guilty, or having already so pleaded, to persist in that plea;
b. to have a trial by jury; and
Case 1:25-cr-03855-KWR Document 20 Filed 12/16/25 Page 2 of 16
at atrial:
i. to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses,
ii. to be protected from compelled self-incrimination,
iii. to testifu and present evidence on the Defendant's own behalf, and
iv. to compel the attendance of witnesses for the defense.
WAIVER OF RIGHTS Ai\D PLEA OF GUILTY
The Defendant agrees to waive these rights and to plead guilty to Counts 3,9,14,
17,21, and23 of the indictment, charging a violations of:
a. Counts 3 and 9: 18 U.S.C. $$ 1343 and2, Wire Fraud;
b. Counts 14 and 17: 18 U.S.C. $$ 1341 and2, Mail Fraud;
c. Counts 21 and23:18 U.S.C. $$ 641 and2, Theft of Government Property.
SENTENCING
4. The Defendant understands that the maximum penalty provided by law for these
offenses is: offense is:
Counts 3" 9. 14. and l7: Wire Fraud and Mail Fraud
a. imprisonment for a period of not more than 30 years;
b. a fine not to exceed the greater of $ 1,000,000 or twice the pecuniary gain to
the Defendant or pecuniary loss to the victim;
c. a term of supervised release of not more than 5 years to follow any term of
imprisonment. (If the Defendant serves a term of imprisonment, is then
released on supervised release, and violates the conditions ofsupervised
release, the Defendant's supervised release could be revoked even on the
-
Case 1:25-cr-03855-KWR Document 20 Filed 12/16/25 Page 3 of 16
last day of the term and the Defendant could then be returned to another
-
period of incarceration and a new term of supervised release.);
d. a mandatory special penalty assessment of $100.00; and
e. restitution as may be ordered by the Court.
Counts 21 and 23: Theft of Government Propertv
a. imprisonment for a period of not more than 10 years;
b. a fine not to exceed the greater of $250,000 or twice the pecuniary gain to the
Defendant or pecuniary loss to the victim;
c. a term of supervised release of not more than 3 years to follow any term of
imprisonment. (If the Defendant seryes a term of imprisonment, is then released
on supervised release, and violates the conditions ofsupervised release, the
Defendant's supervised release could be revoked even on the last day of the
-
term and the Defendant could then be returned to another period of
-
incarceration and a new term ofsupervised release.);
d. a mandatory special penalty assessment of $100.00; and
e. restitution as may be ordered by the Court.
5. The parties recognize that the federal sentencing guidelines are advisory and that
the Court is required to consider them in determining the sentence it imposes. The Defendant
further recognizes that while the Defendant's attorney may have made a prediction or estimate of
the sentence that the Court may impose, the Defendant understands that the Court is not bound
by any such estimate or prediction.
Case 1:25-cr-03855-KWR Document 20 Filed 12/16/25 Page 4 of 16
ELEMENTS OF THE OFFENSE
6. If this matter proceeded to trial, the Defendant understands that the United States
would be required to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, the following elements for violations of
the charges listed below:
Counts 3 and 9: l8 U.S.C. Q8 1343 and 2. that being Wire Fraud:
First: The defendant devised or intended to devise a scheme to
defraud, including by a scheme to obtain money or
property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses,
representations or promises;
Second: The defendant acted with specific intent to defraud;
Third: The defendant used interstate or foreign wire
communications facilities or caused another person to
use interstate or foreign wire;
Fourth: The scheme employed false or fraudulent pretenses,
representations, or promises that were material;
Ffth: The scheme was related to a presidentially declared
major disaster or emergency.
-or-
The scheme affected a financial institution.
Counts 14 and 17: 18 U.S.C. $$ 1341 and 2" that being Mail Fraud:
First: The defendant devised or intended to devise a scheme to
defraud, including by a scheme to obtain money or
property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses,
representations or promises;
Second: The defendant acted with specific intent to defraud;
Third: The defendant knowingly caused to be delivered by
mail any matter or thing;
Fourth: The scheme employed false or fraudulent pretenses,
representations, or promises that were material;
Fifth: The scheme was related to a presidentially declared
major disaster or emergency.
Case 1:25-cr-03855-KWR Document 20 Filed 12/16/25 Page 5 of 16
-or-
The scheme affected a financial institution.
Counts 21 and 23: 18 U.S.C. 88 641 and 2" that being Theft of Government Propert.v:
First: The property belonged to the United States government;
it does not matter whether the defendant knew that the
property belonged to the United States government,
only that he knew it did not belong to him;
Second; The defendant stole, embezzled, converted the property
intending to put it to his own use or gain, or to the use
or gain ofanother, or the defendant took the property
knowing it was not his and intending to deprive the
owner of the use or benefit of the property;
Third: The defendant acted knowingly and willfully;
Fourth: The value of the property was more than $1,000.
DEFENDANT'S ADMISSION OF FACTS
7. By my signature on this plea agreement, I am acknowledging that I am pleading
guilty because I am, in fact, guilty of the offense(s) to which I am pleading guilty. I recognize
and accept responsibility for my criminal conduct. Moreover, in pleading guilty, I acknowledge
that if I chose to go to trial instead of entering this plea, the United States could prove facts
sufficient to establish my guilt of the offense(s) to which I am pleading guilty beyond a
reasonable doubt, including any facts alleged in the indictment that increase the statutory
minimum or maximum penalties. I specifically admit the following facts related to the charges
against me, and declare under penalty of perjury that all of these facts are true and correct:
From in or about July 2020 and continuing to in or about February 202lrin
Bernalillo County, in the District of New Mexico, and elsewhere, I, Marc Long,
knowingly and intentionally devised a scheme and artifice to defraud
and to obtain money and property, and to attempt to defraud and to obtain money
Case 1:25-cr-03855-KWR Document 20 Filed 12/16/25 Page 6 of 16
and property, by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses,
representations and promises. My scheme involved my stealing property belonging
to the United States, namely federal funds that were issued in response to a
presidentially declared major disaster or emergency (the COVID-l9 pandemic), and
affected financial institutions. I acted with a specific intent to defraud. Furthermore,
in furtherance of my scheme, I used interstate or foreign wire communications
facilities or caused another person to use interstate or foreign wires, and I caused
matter to be delivered by mail.
More specifically, during these dates, while I was residing in Texaso I submitted
fraudulent unemployment insurance (UI) claim applications online (using mobile
phone, broadband, and cable internet connections) through the New Mexico
Department of Workforce Solutions (NMDWS), and thereafter I submitted weekly
certifications for certain claims that were approved. I submitted the fraudulent UI
claim applications and the certifications to receive UI benefits that were funded by
the federal government. I made materially false and fraudulent representations in
the UI applications by using the names and other personally identifiable
information (PII) of other individuals. Neither I nor the other individuals whose
names and PII I used in the UI claim applications were eligible to receive the
federally-funded UI benefits from the NMDWS. My actions in filing the fraudulent
UI claim applications and certifications, prompted the NMDWS to initiate interstate
wire transfers between NMDWS, Conduent, Wells Fargo Bank, and the State
Unemployment Trust Fund, and to initiate mailings through the United States
Postal Service (USPS). For the approved claims, the NMDWS sent money in the
Case 1:25-cr-03855-KWR Document 20 Filed 12/16/25 Page 7 of 16
form debit cards through the USPS, and it also sent direct deposits into financial
institutions whose accounts I could access.
As charged in Count 3, prior to October 6,2020,I knowingly submitted a
fraudulent application for UI benefits using the name and PII of D.C. My
fraudulent application caused the NMDWS to initiate interstate wire transmissions
on or about October 6,2020, to deposit UI benefits into a JP Morgan Chase account
that was accessible by me.
As charged in Count 9, on or about February l4r202lr I knowingly used interstate
wire transmissions to submit a fraudulent application for UI benefits using the
name and PII of D.A.
As charged in Count 14,I knowingly submitted a fraudulent application for UI
benefits using the name and PII of D.G. My fraudulent application caused the
NMDWS, on November 21,2020, to have a debit card, used for the distribution of
UI benefits, mailed to an address in Texas that was accessible by me.
As charged in Count 17,I knowingly submitted a fraudulent application for UI
benefits using the name and PII of C.M. My fraudulent application caused the
NMDWS, on February llr202l, to have a debit card, used for the distribution of UI
benefits, mailed to an address in Texas that was accessible by me.
As charged in Count 21, between September 2'1r2020, and October 25r2020,I
knowingly and willfully stole and converted to my own use, or the use of another,
federal COVID relief funds provided for unemployment benefits when I submitted a
fraudulent application to the NMDWS using the name and PII of D.C. which caused
Case 1:25-cr-03855-KWR Document 20 Filed 12/16/25 Page 8 of 16
the NMDWS to issue $2,121in federally-funded benefits to which I had access but
was not entitled.
As charged in Count23, between September27r2020, and September5,202lrl
knowingly and willfully stole and converted to my own use, or the use of another,
federal COYID relief funds provided for unemployment benefits when I submitted a
fraudulent application to the NMDWS using the name and PII of T.B. which caused
the NMDWS to issue $20,450 in federally-funded benefits to which I had access but
was not entitled.
I admit that my actions violated 18 U.S.C. S$ 1343, 1341, and 641..
8. By signing this agreement, the Defendant admits that there is a factual basis for
each element of the crime(s) to which the Defendant is pleading guilty and agrees to affirm the
facts set forth above during the plea colloquy. The Defendant agrees that the Court may rely on
any of these facts, as well as facts in the presentence report, to determine the Defendant's
sentence, including, but not limited to, the advisory guideline offense level.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Pursuant to Rule 11(oX1XB), the United States and the Defendant recommend as
The United States agrees to recommend a sentence at the low end of the
guideline range as calculated by the Court. This recommendation does not
extend to any sentence to be imposed upon revocation of probation or
supervised release.
As of the date of this agreement, the Defendant has clearly demonstrated a
recognition and affirmative acceptance of personal responsibility for the
Case 1:25-cr-03855-KWR Document 20 Filed 12/16/25 Page 9 of 16
Defendant's criminal conduct. Consequently, pursuant to U.S.S.G. $
3E1.1(a), so long as the Defendant continues to accept responsibility for the
Defendant's criminal conduct, the Defendant is entitled to a reduction of two
levels from the base offense level as calculated under the sentencing
guidelines, and if applicable, a reduction of an additional offense level
pursuant to U.S.S.G. $ 3E1.1(b). This reduction is contingent upon the
Defendant personally providing to the United States Probation Officer who
prepares the presentence report in this case an appropriate oral or written
statement in which the Defendant clearly establishes the Defendant's
entitlement to this reduction. Further, the United States is free to withdraw
this recommendation if the Defendant engages in any conduct that is
inconsistent with acceptance of responsibility between the date of this
agreement and the sentencing hearing. Such conduct would include
committing additional crimes, failing to appear in Court as required, and/or
failing to obey any conditions of release that the Court may set.
The Defendant understands that the above recommendations are not binding
on the Court and that whether the Court accepts these recommendations is a
matter solely within the discretion of the Court after it has reviewed the
presentence report. Further, the Defendant understands that the Court may
choose to vary from the advisory guideline sentence. If the Court does not
accept any one or more of the above recommendations and reaches an
advisory guideline sentence different than expected by the Defendant, or if the
Court varies from the advisory guideline range, the Defendant will not seek to
Case 1:25-cr-03855-KWR Document 20 Filed 12/16/25 Page 10 of 16
withdraw the Defendant's plea of guilty. In other words, regardless of any of
the parties' recommendations, the Defendant's final sentence is solely within
the discretion of the Court.
10. Apart from the recommendations set forth in this plea agreement, the United
States and the Defendant reserve their rights to assert any position or argument with respect to
the sentence to be imposed, including but not limited to the applicability of particular sentencing
guidelines, adjustments under the guidelines, departures or variances from the guidelines, and the
application of factors in 18 U.S.C. $ 3553(a).
1 1. Regardless of any other provision in this agreement, the United States reserves the
right to provide to the United States Pretrial Services and Probation Office and to the Court any
information the United States believes may be helpful to the Court, including but not limited to
information about the recommendations contained in this agreement and any relevant conduct
under U.S.S.G. $ 181.3.
DEFENDAIIT' S ADDITIONAL AGREEMENT
12. The Defendant understands the Defendant's obligation to provide the United
States Pretrial Services and Probation Office with truthful, accurate, and complete information.
The Defendant represents that the Defendant has complied with and will continue to comply with
this obligation.
13. The Defendant agrees that any financial records and information provided by the
Defendant to the Probation Office, before or after sentencing, may be disclosed to the United
States Attomey's Office for use in the collection of any unpaid financial obligation.
14. The Defendant agrees that, upon the Defendant's signing of this plea agreement,
the facts that the Defendant has admitted under this plea agreement as set forth above, as well as
10
Case 1:25-cr-03855-KWR Document 20 Filed 12/16/25 Page 11 of 16
any facts to which the Defendant admits in open court at the Defendant's plea hearing, shall be
admissible against the Defendant under Federal Rule of Evidence 801(dX2XA) in any
subsequent proceeding, including a criminal trial, and the Defendant expressly waives the
Defendant's rights under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 1 1 (f) and Federal Rule of Evidence
410 with regard to the facts the Defendant admits in conjunction with this plea agreement.
15. By signing this plea agreement, the Defendant waives the right to withdraw the
Defendant's plea of guilty pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 1 1 (d) unless ( I ) the
court rejects the plea agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(5) or (2)
the Defendant can show a fair and just reason as those terms are used in Rule 1 I (d)(2)(B) for
requesting the withdrawal. Furthermore, the Defendant understands that if the court rejects the
plea agreement, whether or not the Defendant withdraws the guilty plea, the United States is
relieved of any obligation it had under the agreement and the Defendant shall be subject to
prosecution for any federal, state, or local crime(s) which this agreement otherwise anticipated
would be dismissed or not prosecuted.
16. The Defendant will not willfully fail to appear for any court appearance in this
matter, nor willfully fail to surrender as ordered for service of any sentence.
The Defendant agrees not to engage in conduct that would constitute a new
crime. Offenses that would be excluded for sentencing purposes under U.S.S.G. $ 4A1 .2(c) are
not within the scope of this paragraph's agreement.
18. Defendant agrees not to engage in conduct that would constitute obstructing or
impeding the administration ofjustice under U.S.S.G. $ 3C1.1.
11
Case 1:25-cr-03855-KWR Document 20 Filed 12/16/25 Page 12 of 16
RESTITUTION
19. The parties agree that, as part of the Defendant's sentence, the Court will enter an
order of restitution pursuant to the Mandatory Victim's Restitution Act, l8 U.S.C. $ 36634, if
applicable; if $ 3663A is not applicable, the Court will enter an order of restitution pursuant to 18
U.S.C. $$ 3663 and3664. The Defendant agrees and acknowledges that, as part of the
Defendant's sentence, the Court is not limited to ordering restitution only for the amount
involved in the particular offense or offenses to which the Defendant is entering a plea of guilty,
but may and should order restitution resulting from all of the Defendant's criminal conduct
related to this case.
20. No later than July 1 of each year after sentencing, until restitution is paid in full,
the Defendant shall provide the Asset Recovery Unit, United States Attorney's Office, 201 Third
Street NW, Suite 900, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102, (1) a completed and signed financial
statement provided to the Defendant by the United States Attorney's Office and/or the United
States Probation Office and (2) a copy of the Defendant's most recent tax returns.
FORFEITURE
21. The Defendant agrees to forfeit, and hereby forfeits, whatever interest the
Defendant may have in any asset derived from or used in the commission of the offense(s) in this
case.
WAIVER OF APPEAL AND POST-CONVICTION RIGHTS
22. The Defendant is aware that2& U.S.C. $ 1291 and 18 U.S.C. S 3742 afford the
right to appeal a conviction and the sentence imposed. Acknowledging that, the Defendant
knowingly waives the right to appeal the Defendant's convictions and sentence, as well as any
order of restitution entered by the Court. This waiver extends to any challenge to the manner in
t2
Case 1:25-cr-03855-KWR Document 20 Filed 12/16/25 Page 13 of 16
which the sentence was determined or imposed, including the district court's authority to make
findings supporting the sentence.
23. The Defendant also waives the right to appeal any sentence imposed below or
within the guideline range upon a revocation of supervised release in this cause number but may
nonetheless appeal the determination of the revocation guideline range.
24. The Defendant also waives the right to appeal the denial of any motion filed under
18 U.S.C. $ 3582(c) where such denial rests upon the court's determination that a sentence
reduction is not warranted under the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. $ 3553(a).
25. In addition, the Defendant agrees to waive any collateral attack to the Defendant's
conviction(s) and any sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C . SS 2241,2255, or any other extraordinary
writ, except on the issue of defense counsel's ineffective assistance.
26. The Defendant waives any challenge related to the initiation or conduct of his
case by the United States Attorney's Office or Assistant United States Attorneys in the absence
of a United States Attorney appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate.
GOVERNMENT' S ADDITIONAL AGREEMENT
27. Provided that the Defendant fulfills the Defendant's obligations as set out above,
the United States agrees that:
a. Following sentencing, the United States will move to dismiss Counts l-2,4-8,
l0-13, 15-16, l8-20,22,and24-29 of the indictment.
b. The United States will not bring additional criminal charges against the
Defendant arising out of the facts forming the basis of the present indictment.
13
Case 1:25-cr-03855-KWR Document 20 Filed 12/16/25 Page 14 of 16
VOLUNTARY PLEA
28. The Defendant agrees and represents that this plea of guilty is freely and
voluntarily made and is not the result of force, threats, or promises (other than the promises set
forth in this agreement and any addenda). There have been no promises from anyone as to what
sentence the Court will impose. The Defendant also represents that the Defendant is pleading
guilty because the Defendant is in fact guilty.
VIOLATION OF PLEA AGREEMENT
29. The Defendant agrees that if the Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence
that the Defendant has violated any provision of this agreement, the United States will be
released from its obligations under the agreement. If the Defendant has pleaded guilty to any
lesser-included offense(s), the Defendant's violation of this plea agreement will result in
reinstatement of the greater offense(s). The Defendant waives any claim that the Defendant's
guilty plea under the rejected agreement bars prosecution of any additional offenses on double-
jeopardy grounds.
30. The Defendant further agrees that in the event the Court finds that Defendant has
breached this plea agreement, thus releasing the United States of its obligations under the
agreement, such events do not constitute a fair and just reason under Rule 11(d)(2)(B) for
withdrawing the guilty plea(s) entered pursuant to this agreement.
31. Following the Court's finding of a breach of this agreement by the Defendant,
should the United States choose to pursue any charge that was either dismissed or not filed as a
result of this agreement, the Defendant waives any defense to that charge or charges based on the
lapse of time between the entry of this agreement and the Court's finding of a breach by the
Defendant.
14
Case 1:25-cr-03855-KWR Document 20 Filed 12/16/25 Page 15 of 16
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
At the time of sentencing, the Defendant will tender to the United States District
Court, District of New Mexico, 333 Lomas Blvd. NW, Suite 270, Albuquerque, New Mexico
87102, a money order or certified check payable to the order of the United States District
Court in the amount of $600.00 in payment of the special penalty assessment described above.
ENTIRETY OF AGREEMENT
JJ. This document and any addenda are a complete statement of the agreement in this
case and may not be altered unless done so in writing and signed by all parties. This agreement is
effective upon signature by the Defendant and an Assistant United States Attorney.
AGREED ro AND SIGNED this lffiay of (,2025.
TODD BLANCHE
Deputy Affomey General
RYAN ELLISON
Assistant United States Attomey
201 Third Street, Suite 900
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102
(s}s) 346-7274
I have carefully discussed every part of this agreement with my client. Further, I have
fully advised my client of my client's rights, of possible defenses, of the sentencing factors set
forth in l8 U.S.C. $ 3553(a), of the relevant sentencing guidelines provisions, and of the
consequences of entering into this agreement. In addition, I have explained to my client the
elements to each offense to which she/he is pleading guilty. To my knowledge, my client's
decision to enter into this agreement is an informed and voluntary one.
omack
15
Case 1:25-cr-03855-KWR Document 20 Filed 12/16/25 Page 16 of 16
I have carefully discussed every part of this agreement with my attorney. I understand
the terms of this agreement, and I voluntarily agree to those terms. My attorney has advised me
of my rights, of possible defenses, of the sentencing factors set forth in l8 U.S.C. $ 3553(a), of
the relevant sentencing guidelines provisions, and of the consequences of entering into this
agreement.
Marc Long
Defendant
t6File and source
- File
- 20.pdf
- Size
- 7,857,680 bytes
- SHA-256
- 2a88813844d619c159fe6401c0c328bab6ba91d2e796a7878b7ebe1c75e392eb
- Our copy
- 20.pdf