Court filing
Order Continuing Trial Date — United States v. Kerwin Aldric Jordan (C.D. Cal.)
Filed December 15, 2025 in U.S. v. Kerwin Jordan; one of 12 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2025-12-15 |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California · No. 2:25-cr-00801-SVW · Doc. 22 · 2025-12-15 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TODD BLANCHE
Deputy Attorney General
BILAL A. ESSAYLI
First Assistant United States Attorney
ALEXANDER B. SCHWAB
Assistant United States Attorney
Acting Chief, Criminal Division
RANEE A. KATZENSTEIN (Cal. Bar No. 187111)
Assistant United States Attorney
Acting Deputy Chief, Criminal Appeals Section
1000 United States Courthouse
312 North Spring Street
Los Angeles, California 90012
Telephone: (213) 894-2432
E-mail:
ranee.katzenstein@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
KERWIN ALDRIC JORDAN,
Defendant.
No. CR 2:25-cr-801-SVW
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL
DATE AND FINDINGS REGARDING
EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS PURSUANT
TO SPEEDY TRIAL ACT
NEW TRIAL DATE: [04-28-26]
The Court has read and considered the Stipulation Regarding
Request for (1) Continuance of Trial Date and (2) Findings of
Excludable Time Periods Pursuant to Speedy Trial Act, filed by the
parties in this matter on December 11, 2025. The Court hereby finds
that the Stipulation, which this Court incorporates by reference into
this Order, demonstrates facts that support a continuance of the
trial date in this matter, and provides good cause for a finding of
excludable time pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161.
The Court further finds that: (i) the ends of justice served by
the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and
Case 2:25-cr-00801-SVW Document 22 Filed 12/15/25 Page 1 of 3 Page ID #:137
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
defendant in a speedy trial; (ii) failure to grant the continuance
would be likely to make a continuation of the proceeding impossible,
or result in a miscarriage of justice; and (iii) failure to grant the
continuance would unreasonably deny defendant continuity of counsel
and would deny defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for
effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due
diligence.
THEREFORE, FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN:
1.
The trial in this matter is continued from January 6, 2026,
to April 28, 2026.
2.
The time period of January 6, 2026, to April 28, 2026,
inclusive, is excluded in computing the time within which the trial
must commence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A), (h)(7)(B)(i),
and (B)(iv).
3.
Defendant shall appear in Courtroom 10A of the Federal
Courthouse, 350 W. 1st Street, Los Angeles, California on April 28,
2026, at 9:00 a.m.
///
///
///
Case 2:25-cr-00801-SVW Document 22 Filed 12/15/25 Page 2 of 3 Page ID #:138
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4.
Nothing in this Order shall preclude a finding that other
provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time
periods are excluded from the period within which trial must
commence. Moreover, the same provisions and/or other provisions of
the Speedy Trial Act may in the future authorize the exclusion of
additional time periods from the period within which trial must
commence.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
December 15, 2025
DATE
HONORABLE STEPHEN V. WILSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Presented by:
/s/
Ranee A. Katzenstein
Assistant United States Attorney
Case 2:25-cr-00801-SVW Document 22 Filed 12/15/25 Page 3 of 3 Page ID #:139File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cacd.991972.22.0.pdf
- Size
- 137,113 bytes
- SHA-256
- afc6370d45e1bd600f43a1a484feb55a761df1f1e3f75ccd5fc73ce888a2dcc2
- Original
- PACER (login required)