Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Jose Biaou case — U.S. District Court, D.D.C. Verdict Form — United States v. Biaou (Dkt. 101, D.D.C.)

Court filing

Verdict Form — United States v. Biaou (Dkt. 101, D.D.C.)

Summary

The jury's verdict form in United States v. Jose Biaou, Case No. 24-cr-323 (CRC), in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, filed February 17, 2026 as Document 101. It lists Counts One through Six, each charging wire fraud, and Count Seven, aggravated identity theft, with a guilty or not guilty choice for each, and instructs the jury to consider Count Seven only if it found the defendant guilty of Count Three. The form is signed by the foreperson.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed February 17, 2026 in Jose Biaou; one of 1 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Filed2026-02-17

Cite this document

“Verdict Form — United States v. Biaou (Dkt. 101, D.D.C.).” U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 1:24-cr-00323, Doc. 101, filed 2026-02-17. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/us-v-jose-biaou/2026-02-17-verdict-form-dkt-101/, SHA-256 0a14fc477c61a6e59ca7567e49e36f8d64d6526d15ffd666a8d0f8c1b22a7553.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 1:24-cr-00323-CRC Document101 Filed 02/17/26 Page1of2

                     UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                     FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                  Vv.
                                     Case No. 24-cr-323 (CRC)
 JOSE BIAOU,

                  Defendant.

                             VERDICT FORM

             WE, THE JURY, UNANIMOUSLY FIND AS FOLLOWS:

COUNT ONE (WIRE FRAUD):

As to COUNT ONE, charging defendant JOSE BIAOU with Wire Fraud, we the jury find the
defendant:

                    4 Guilty                   Not Guilty

COUNT TWO (WIRE FRAUD):

As to COUNT TWO, charging defendant JOSE BIAOU with Wire Fraud, we the jury find the
defendant:

                    4 Guilty                   Not Guilty

COUNT THREE (WIRE FRAUD):

As to COUNT THREE, charging defendant JOSE BIAOU with Wire Fraud, we the jury find the

defendant:          /

                         Guilty                Not Guilty

Case 1:24-cr-00323-CRC Document101 Filed 02/17/26 Page 2of2

COUNT FOUR (WIRE FRAUD):
As to COUNT FOUR, charging defendant JOSE BIAOU with Wire Fraud, we the jury find the
defendant:

Guilty Not Guilty

COUNT FIVE (WIRE FRAUD):
As to COUNT FIVE, charging defendant JOSE BIAOU with Wire Fraud, we the jury find the

defendant: /

Guilty Not Guilty

COUNT SIX (WIRE FRAUD):

As to COUNT SIX, charging defendant JOSE BIAOU with Wire Fraud, we the jury find the

defendant: /
Guilty Not Guilty

With regard to Count Seven of the Indictment, only consider Count Seven of the Indictment if
you have found the defendant guilty of Count Three. If you have found the defendant not guilty
on Count Three, then you should not render a verdict on Count Seven of the Indictment.

COUNT SEVEN (AGGRAVATED IDENTITY THEFT):

As to COUNT SEVEN, charging defendant JOSE BIAOU with Aggravated Identity Theft, we
the jury find the defendant:

Guilty Nat Guiltv

Fo fepfer. son

sae FEY) (7 / DOLE

File and source

File
101.pdf
Size
55,202 bytes
SHA-256
0a14fc477c61a6e59ca7567e49e36f8d64d6526d15ffd666a8d0f8c1b22a7553
Our copy
101.pdf
Back to top