Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings U.S. v. Jean Jacques Joint Interim Status Report — United States v. Jean-Jacques

Court filing

Joint Interim Status Report — United States v. Jean-Jacques

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Filed2026-05-20

U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts · No. 1:26-cr-10030-RGS · Doc. 67 · 2026-05-20 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

A joint interim status report filed May 20, 2026 under Local Rule 116.5(b) by the United States and defendants Sniders Jean-Jacques, German Olivo, Jim Kelly Michel, Tanya Pierre and Rosalie Clement-Jackson in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, No. 1:26-cr-10030-RGS, Doc. 67. It reports that the government produced discovery of just under 50,000 pages on March 24, 2026 and April 30, 2026, and expects further productions on or about May 29, 2026 and June 30, 2026. The parties state that a protective order is in place, that no Rule 12(b) motions are pending, and that no defendant intends to offer insanity, public authority or alibi defenses. The report says the government is in plea discussions with two defendants, estimates a case-in-chief of no more than two weeks, and asks for a further conference in about 60 days with time excluded under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7).

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS 
 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
 
 
v. 
 
(1) SNIDERS JEAN-JACQUES, 
(2) GERMAN OLIVO, 
(3) JIM KELLY MICHEL,  
(4) TANYA PIERRE, and 
(5) ROSALIE CLEMENT-JACKSON 
 
 Defendants 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
 
 
 
 
Criminal No. 25-10030-RGS-JCB 
 
 
JOINT INTERIM STATUS REPORT 
 
Pursuant to Local Rule 116.5(b), the United States and defendants Sniders Jean-Jacques, 
German Olivo, Jim Kelly Michel, Tanya Pierre, and Rosalie Clement-Jackson state as follows: 
(1) 
Status of Automatic Discovery and Pending Discovery Requests 
 
The government produced automatic and supplemental discovery totaling just under 
50,000 pages to all defendants on March 24, 2026 and April 30, 2026.  These productions consist 
of mortgage loan files, apartment rental files, text chats between conspirators, and search materials.  
As discussed below, the government anticipates making its next rolling production on or about 
May 29, 2026, which will include bank and other financial records as well as additional text chat 
files.  
 
Additionally, in early May 2026, the government produced body worn camera footage to 
individual defendants, as well as written or recorded statements they may have made to 
investigators (including, for defendant Sniders Jean-Jacques, the full iCloud return obtained 
pursuant to search warrant No. 24-mj-7416).    
 
On April 30, 2026, counsel for defendant Jean-Jacques requested (a) any reports describing 
the events surrounding Jean-Jacques’s arrest, as well as any searches conducted at that time; (b) 
Case 1:26-cr-10030-RGS     Document 67     Filed 05/20/26     Page 1 of 5

2 
 
any reports documenting law enforcement’s efforts to locate Jean-Jacques in order to effectuate 
his arrest; and (c) body worn camera footage from Jean-Jacques’s arrest.  As noted, the government 
has now produced the body worn camera footage from Jean-Jacques’s arrest at the West Dixie 
Highway location, as well as body worn camera footage from the attempted arrest at the 156 NE 
Terrace location, to his counsel.  The government is confirming whether any of the requested 
reports exist. 
 
The government has requested reciprocal discovery under Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b) and Local 
Rule 116.1(d).  There are no other pending discovery requests.   Defendants have not yet produced 
any discovery to the government. 
(2) 
Timing of Any Additional Discovery To Be Produced 
 
As noted above, the government anticipates making a supplemental production on or about 
May 29, 2026, which will include bank and other financial records (including the 
borrowers/renters’ true bank statements as well as defendants’ bank statements and financial 
records), as well as additional text chat files. 
The government is still processing and reviewing electronic devices obtained during the 
execution of search warrants on defendant Jean-Jacques’s person and residence and Jim Kelly 
Michel’s person.  The government expects to receive copies of these devices to begin its review 
on or about May 28, 2026 and anticipates producing materials from these devices in a subsequent 
production on or about June 30, 2026.   
The government will provide additional discovery as it is received and processed pursuant 
to Local Rule 116.7.   
 
 
Case 1:26-cr-10030-RGS     Document 67     Filed 05/20/26     Page 2 of 5

3 
 
(3) 
Timing of Any Additional Discovery Requests 
 
Defendants are reviewing the materials produced thus far and have no current plans to 
make a discovery request, but reserve their rights to do so after having reviewed all the automatic 
and supplemental discovery produced by the government. 
(4) 
Protective Orders 
 
There is a protective order currently in place.  See Dkt. 45. 
(5) 
Pretrial Motions Under Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b) 
 
Defendants are reviewing the discovery materials and evaluating the merits of any motions 
under Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b).  Defendants do not have any motions under Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b) 
at this time. 
(6) 
Timing of Expert Disclosures 
 
Should expert testimony prove necessary, the government agrees to make the requisite 
expert witness disclosures 60 days before trial, and the defendants agree to make reciprocal expert 
disclosures 30 days before trial. 
(7) 
Defenses of Insanity, Public Authority, or Alibi 
No defendant intends to offer defenses of insanity, public authority, or alibi. 
(8)  
Speedy Trial Act Calculation 
 
The Court excluded all time between defendants’ respective initial appearances in this 
District and May 26, 2026 from the Speedy Trial clock.  See Dkts. 30, 33, 36, 41, 42, 53.  Following 
issuance of the latest Order on Excludable Delay, the Court rescheduled the interim status 
conference from May 26, 2026 to May 28, 2026. 
 
 
Case 1:26-cr-10030-RGS     Document 67     Filed 05/20/26     Page 3 of 5

4 
 
(9) 
Status of Plea Discussions and Estimated Length of Trial 
 
The government is engaged in plea discussions with two of the defendants and will be 
reaching out to counsel for the remaining three defendants in short order.  If the case were to 
proceed to trial, the government currently estimates that its case-in-chief would not exceed two 
weeks.   
(10) 
Timing of an Interim Status Conference 
 
As noted, the government is continuing to produce discovery, is engaged in plea 
negotiations with two of the defendants, and anticipates additional plea discussions in the 
following months.  Accordingly, the parties request that the Court convene a further interim status 
conference in approximately 60 days to give the defendants and their counsel sufficient time to 
review the discovery productions, including the forthcoming rolling productions.  The parties ask 
the Court to exclude the period until that conference under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) in order that 
the defendants may have adequate time to review discovery and formulate a discovery plan, if 
necessary.  The defendants agree to exclude the time between May 26, 2026, and the date of the 
interim status conference from the Speedy Trial calculation.   
 
In light of the status of the case, the parties agree that an interim status conference is 
unnecessary and request that the Court issue an order cancelling the initial status conference. 
 
Respectfully submitted, 
Respectfully submitted, 
 
LEAH B. FOLEY 
SNIDERS JEAN-JACQUES 
United States Attorney 
 
By: /s/ Kristen A. Kearney 
 
By: /s/ Jane Peachy  
 
 
 
KRISTEN A. KEARNEY 
JANE PEACHY  
 
 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
Peachy Hackett & Sunderland 
 
88 Broad Street, Suite 101 
 
Boston, MA 02110 
 
 
 
Case 1:26-cr-10030-RGS     Document 67     Filed 05/20/26     Page 4 of 5

5 
 
 
GERMAN OLIVO 
 
 
By: /s/ Ian Gold 
 
 
 
 
IAN GOLD 
 
Law Office of Ian Gold 
 
185 Devonshire Street, Suite 302 
 
Boston, MA 02110 
 
 
 
JIM KELLY MICHEL 
 
 
By: /s/ Paul J. Garrity 
 
 
 
PAUL J. GARRITY 
 
Law Office of Paul Garrity 
 
14 Londonderry Road 
 
Londonderry, NH 03053 
 
 
 
TANYA PIERRE 
 
 
By: /s/ Mark W. Shea 
 
 
 
MARK W. SHEA 
 
Shea & LaRocque, LLP 
 
88 Broad Street, Suite 101 
 
Boston, MA 02110 
 
 
 
 
ROSALIE CLEMENT-JACKSON 
 
 
By: /s/ Lorenzo Perez 
 
 
 
LORENZO PEREZ 
 
Law Office of Lorenzo Perez 
 
One Boston Place, Suite 2600 
 
Boston, MA 02108 
 
 
 
Date:  May 20, 2026 
 
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
 
 
I hereby certify that this document, filed through the ECF system, will be sent 
electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing. 
 
Dated: May 20, 2026  
 
 
 
/s/ Kristen A. Kearney  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Kristen A. Kearney 
Case 1:26-cr-10030-RGS     Document 67     Filed 05/20/26     Page 5 of 5

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.mad.295477.67.0.pdf
Size
156,575 bytes
SHA-256
2d4db2951f0ca519947ed2241fb16cb45ddf7ad70f83646d02e48dfa15af4583
Our copy
gov.uscourts.mad.295477.67.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top