Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States v. Holmes Superseding criminal information — U.S. v. Holmes (E.D. Mo.)

Court filing

Superseding criminal information — U.S. v. Holmes (E.D. Mo.)

Filed February 27, 2024 in U.S. v. Holmes; one of 3 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Filed2024-02-27

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri · No. 4:23-cr-00527-SEP · Doc. 44 · 2024-02-27 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI 
EASTERN DIVISION 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
) 
) 
) 
) 
Plaintiff, 
FILED 
FEB 2 7 2024 
U. S. DISTRICT COURT 
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MO 
ST. LOUIS 
V. 
) No. Sl-4:23CR00527 RLW 
) 
MICHAEL HOLMES, 
) 
) 
Defendant. 
) 
SUPERSEDING INFORMATION 
The United States Attorney charges: 
COUNT1 
(Bank Fraud) 
A. 
Financial Institution 
I. 
At all times relevant to the indictment, St. Louis Community Credit Union was a 
federally insured financial institution with assets insured by the National Credit Union Association. 
B. 
The Scheme to Defraud 
2. 
Between on or about March 28, 2023 and continuing to on or about October 3, 2023, 
within the Eastern District of Missouri and elsewhere, the defendant, 
MICHAEL HOLMES, 
being aided, abetted, counseled, and induced by persons known to the Grand Jury did participate 
in a scheme and artifice to defraud and to obtain moneys, funds, and assets owned by and under 
the custody and control of a federally insured financial institution by means of false and fraudulent 
pretenses and representations. 
Case: 4:23-cr-00527-SEP     Doc. #:  44     Filed: 02/27/24     Page: 1 of 8 PageID #: 79

3. 
The scheme and artifice to defraud was in substance as follows: 
a. It was part of the scheme and artifice to defraud that Defendant submitted a false 
and fraudulent motor vehicle application to St. Louis Community Credit Union 
seeking financing for the purchase of a 2021 Nissan Armada vehicle identification 
number JNSA Y2BA3M9370315 with a retail value of $43,825 from Exotic Escape 
Rental & Sales in St. Charles, Missouri. 
b. It was further part of the scheme and artifice to defraud that Defendant 
fraudulently claimed to St. Louis Community Credit Union that he earned $6,533 a 
month as a car sales manager and that his expenses totaled $213 a month. 
c. It was further part of the scheme and artifice to defraud that Defendant falsely 
claimed to have been employed as a car sales manager with a dealership located in 
St. Louis County, Missouri since March 13, 2019. 
d. It was further part of the scheme and artifice to defraud that Defendant submitted 
to St. Louis Community Credit Union a counterfeit W-2 form as support of his 
fraudulent claims of earnings in tax year 2022 in the amount of $78,641. 
e. It was further part of the scheme and artifice to defraud that Defendant failed to 
secure St. Louis Community Credit Union's lien on the 2021 Nissan Armada and 
used the loan proceeds for his personal benefit and for the benefit of others known to 
the Grand Jury. 
2 
Case: 4:23-cr-00527-SEP     Doc. #:  44     Filed: 02/27/24     Page: 2 of 8 PageID #: 80

4. 
On or about March 29, 2023, in the Eastern District of Missouri, the defendant, 
MICHAEL HOLMES, 
being aided, abetted, counseled, and induced by persons known to the Grand Jury did participate 
in the scheme and artifice to defraud as set forth above, in that MICHAEL HOLMES assisted 
persons known to the Grand Jury in cashing fraudulently obtained check number 00175240 drawn 
on an account of St. Louis Community Credit Union in the amount of $39,443. 
In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1344 and 2. 
A. 
Introduction 
COUNT TWO 
(Wire Fraud) 
5. 
The Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP") was a COVID-19 pandemic relief program 
administered by the Small Business Administration ("SBA") that provided forgivable loans to 
small businesses for job retention and certain other expenses. The PPP permitted participating 
third-party lenders to approve and disburse SBA-backed PPP loans to cover payroll, fixed debts, 
utilities, rent/mortgage, accounts payable and other bills incurred by qualifying businesses during, 
and resulting from, the COVID-19 pandemic. PPP loans were fully guaranteed by the SBA. 
6. 
To obtain a PPP loan, a qualifying business had to submit a PPP loan application, 
which was signed by an authorized representative of the business. The PPP loan application 
required the business (through its authorized representative) to acknowledge the program rules and 
make certain affirmative certifications to be eligible to obtain the PPP loan, including that the 
business was in operation and either had employees for whom it paid salaries and payroll taxes or 
3 
Case: 4:23-cr-00527-SEP     Doc. #:  44     Filed: 02/27/24     Page: 3 of 8 PageID #: 81

paid independent contractors. A business applying for a PPP loan was required to provide 
documentation showing its payroll expenses, such as filed federal income tax documents. 
7. 
PPP loan applications were electronically submitted or caused to be submitted by the 
borrower and received through SBA servers located in Virginia and Oregon. Once approved, the 
business received the PPP loan proceeds via an electronic funds transfer from the third-party lender 
to a financial account under the control of the business. 
8. 
The proceeds of a PPP loan could be used for certain specified items, such as payroll 
costs, costs related to the continuation of group health care benefits, or mortgage interest payments. 
The proceeds of a PPP loan were not permitted to be used by the borrowers to purchase consumer 
goods, automobiles, personal residences, clothing, jewelry, to pay the borrower's personal federal 
income taxes, or to fund the borrower's ordinary day-to-day living expenses unrelated to the 
specified authorized expenses. 
B. 
The Scheme to Defraud 
9. 
Beginning on or about April 5, 2021, and continuing through on or about August 23, 
2021, in the Eastern District of Missouri and elsewhere, the defendant, 
MICHAEL HOLMES, 
devised, and intended to devise, a scheme and artifice to obtain money and to defraud the federal 
government by means of materially false statements and representations, to wit, by submitting 
false and fraudulent information to the Small Business Administration, an agency of the United 
States, in an effort to secure a PPP loan from a federal government program for which he was 
ineligible. 
4 
Case: 4:23-cr-00527-SEP     Doc. #:  44     Filed: 02/27/24     Page: 4 of 8 PageID #: 82

that: 
10. It was part of the scheme and artifice to defraud and to obtain money and property 
a. 
Defendant falsely asserted on SBA Form 2483-C titled "Paycheck Protection 
Program Borrower Application Form for Schedule C Filers Using Gross Income" the 
following: 
1. Defendant was an independent contractor; 
11. His gross income for the tax year of 2020 was $65,232; 
III. Defendant sought a PPP loan to cover payroll costs, rent/mortgage interest, 
utilities, covered operations expenditures, and covered supplier costs. 
b. 
In completing an electronic PPP Fast Lane Application, Defendant falsely 
claimed that he operated Michael Holmes dba MH Property Management and 
Construction at 14805 Charlotte Meadows Court, Florissant, Missouri beginning in 
2017 when, in fact, the Missouri Secretary of State fails to reflect the registration of 
any business by that name in the State of Missouri. 
c. 
Pursuant to funding instructions provided by Defendant, the Small Business 
Administration and its representatives electronically transmitted $13,590 in federal 
funds into Defendant's Navy Federal Credit Union account. 
d. 
Defendant used the proceeds of the PPP loan that was electronically deposited 
into his Navy Federal Credit Union for personal expenses. 
5 
Case: 4:23-cr-00527-SEP     Doc. #:  44     Filed: 02/27/24     Page: 5 of 8 PageID #: 83

B. 
The Wire Transmission 
11. On or about April 5, 2021, in the Eastern District of Missouri and elsewhere, the 
defendant, 
MICHAEL HOLMES, 
for the purpose of executing the above-described scheme to defraud, did cause to be transmitted, 
by means of interstate wire transmissions to servers of the Small Business Administration which 
are located outside the Eastern District of Missouri, certain writings, signs, signals, pictures, and 
sounds, to include the electronic transmission of a fraudulent PPP loan application. 
In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343. 
FORFEITURE ALLEGATION 
The United States Attorney further finds by probable cause that: 
1. 
Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 982(a)(2)(B), 1343 and 1344, upon 
conviction of an offense in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 1344, as 
set forth in Counts 1 and 2, the defendant shall forfeit to the United States of America any property 
constituting, or derived from, proceeds the defendant obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of 
such violation(s) and any personal property used or intended to be used to commit the offense. 
2. 
Subject to forfeiture is a sum of money equal to the total value of any property 
constituting, or derived from, proceeds the defendant obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of 
the violations set forth in Counts I and 2. 
3. 
If any of the property described above, as a result of any act or omission of the 
defendant( s): 
a. 
cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; 
6 
Case: 4:23-cr-00527-SEP     Doc. #:  44     Filed: 02/27/24     Page: 6 of 8 PageID #: 84

b. 
has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party; 
c. 
has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court; 
d. 
has been substantially diminished in value; or 
e. 
has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without 
difficulty, 
the United States of America will be entitled to the forfeiture of substitute property pursuant to 
Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p). 
Respectfully submitted, 
SAYLER A. FLEMING 
United States Attorney 
ls/Tracy L. Berry 
TRACY L. BERRY 014753 TN 
Assistant United States Attorney 
111 South 10th Street, Room 20.333 
St. Louis, Missouri 63102 
(314) 539-2200 
7 
Case: 4:23-cr-00527-SEP     Doc. #:  44     Filed: 02/27/24     Page: 7 of 8 PageID #: 85

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
) 
EASTERN DIVISION 
) 
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI 
) 
I, Tracy L. Berry, Assistant United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri, 
being duly sworn, do say that the foregoing information is true as I verily believe. 
Isl Tracy L. Berry 
TRACY L. BERRY 014753 TN 
* 
Subscribed and sworn to before me this cft day of February 2024. 
cfrR,u.s~URT 
~~ 
E UTYCLERK 
Case: 4:23-cr-00527-SEP     Doc. #:  44     Filed: 02/27/24     Page: 8 of 8 PageID #: 86

File and source

File
doc-044-2024-02-27-Superseding-Information-Holmes.pdf
Size
2,425,612 bytes
SHA-256
05bc548ccbfc7ccb36d00074258c8ebd5b0c1c52a64a62733afbe806c2b09660
Our copy
doc-044-2024-02-27-Superseding-Information-Holmes.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top